To: Swordmaker
Annnnnd there it is. Tim Cook was right.
2 posted on
02/23/2016 11:37:01 AM PST by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: All
Anything THIS Justice Department seeks to do, I’m opposed to....I do not trust Satan....
To: dayglored; ShadowAce; ThunderSleeps; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; ...
So much for the it's JUST THIS ONE iPHONE claim: "Justice Department Seeks to Force Apple to Extract Data From About 12 Other iPhones" -- PING!
Now it is TWELVE MORE!
Ping!
The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me
4 posted on
02/23/2016 11:38:25 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contIDinue....)
To: Swordmaker
I guess Lincoln DIDN’T free the slaves after all!
I am with your guy on this one. Apple needs to fight tooth and nail up to SCOTUS if need be.
5 posted on
02/23/2016 11:38:46 AM PST by
freedumb2003
(Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
To: Swordmaker
So...the San Bern shooters were captured in bona-fides VIDEO yet the prosecutions case is not strong enough to obtain a verdict?
Whoot Da Fook?
7 posted on
02/23/2016 11:40:14 AM PST by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Swordmaker
In five years the world will be awash in encryption the FBI can’t break, provided by parties beyond the reach of the US Government.
This case is pointless.
And, it’s not really an “Apple” issue in the bigger picture...applies to any OS or phone provider.
To: Swordmaker
not likely
4th amendment
plus
13th amendment
plus 5th and 14th amendments
and Apple has the resources (and business purpose) to refuse
15 posted on
02/23/2016 11:47:55 AM PST by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
To: Swordmaker
But the government said it was only ONE phone. Do you suppose they lied about it? The government would never lie to us would they? Say it ain’t so Joe, say it ain’t so.
31 posted on
02/23/2016 12:17:24 PM PST by
Mark17
(Thank God I have Jesus, there's more wealth in my soul than acres of diamonds and mountains of gold)
40 posted on
02/23/2016 12:47:12 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contIDinue....)
To: Swordmaker
Color me shocked.......not
To: Swordmaker
The FBI is lying (go figure)....
It will never stop at just ONE phone.
What’s that quote thank Franklin said about liberty vs. security?
47 posted on
02/23/2016 1:19:23 PM PST by
Roman_War_Criminal
(What to do? Vote for a Dominionist or an Atheist?)
To: Swordmaker
Well, well, well. It is all coming together
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/19/technology/how-tim-cook-became-a-bulwark-for-digital-privacy.html?_r=0
".... Apple had asked the F.B.I. to issue its application for the tool under seal. But the government made it public, ...."
The government made it public because this was the best chance they had to manipulate public opinion. This case is the perfect venue to play on the emotions and fears of the public. Setting a legal precedent was almost a given in the eyes of the DOJ.
To: Swordmaker
I just bought a MacBook Pro, partly because of Apple’s stance on this issue.
Screw the JBTs in DC.
62 posted on
02/24/2016 4:28:57 AM PST by
meyer
(There is no political solution to this troubling evolution...)
To: Swordmaker
Next up on the agenda: force doctors to treat Obamacare patients.
-PJ
67 posted on
02/24/2016 4:59:21 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson