Posted on 02/22/2016 8:12:14 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Nearly every summer over the past decade, toxic algae blooms, fueled by warm weather and contaminated runoff, have coated parts of the Charles River. Now the federal government is poised to issue sweeping regulations ordering a cleanup, a move expected to cost some river municipalities tens of millions of dollars.
The regulations have sparked a range of concerns in cities and towns near the river. In Franklin, for example, local officials estimated the regulations would cost residents an average of $300 a month, and at least $62 million over 20 years, to do things like capture and treat more water.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...
Well I love that dirty water
It’s much better than it used to be and has a terrific bike/walking trail.
Quite a lovely thing.
.
Did the EPA force themselves to clean-up the massive pollution they caused last year in the gold mining disaster they caused out west? Did they fire anyone? Did they imprison anyone? Did they pay any fines? What a bunch of pompous, self-preening losers.
If the EPA attacks anyone, let it be those lib cities and states that voted to support them.
It’s time that communities tell the EPA to put their regulations where the sun don’t shine. Arrest them for trespassing if you have to.
I would think that a state dominated by Democrats and liberals wouldn’t have this type of problem.
LOL. Haven’t heard that song in years.
Who is going to clean up after all the wildlife - the deer, coyotes, moose, etc. We are being overrun with animals that never were here when I was a kid. I'm talking about the suburbs net to Boston, a densely populated area.
We already have a sewer tax that is quadruple the cost of water in greater Boston to clean up Boston Harbor. Maybe the EPA will give birth to another Boston Tea Party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.