To: UB355
I can commiserate somewhat with the county IT guy. You can find yourself off a cliff fast in the world of Apple device security management. (Ever bought a used Mac and got into the firmware lock hell?).
Still, on a (very) high-profile criminal case, I think I'd have not changed anything on the device and enlisted the help of the big boys.
12 posted on
02/19/2016 5:14:30 PM PST by
rpierce
(We have taglines now? :)
To: rpierce
profile criminal case, I think I'd have not changed anything on the device and enlisted the help of the big boys. Yes, and that's why I have no sympathy for the county IT guy, whatsoever. On a case like this, that phone should have been placed in a sealed evidence bag until the person in charge of the investigation said otherwise.
23 posted on
02/19/2016 5:19:28 PM PST by
zedee
To: rpierce
This sounds like there is an administrator or super-user passcode the county had.
38 posted on
02/19/2016 5:24:33 PM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: rpierce
Or even war case... why was Barney Fife on the case?!?
297 posted on
02/22/2016 1:55:04 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson