100% not guilty, Cruz needs to purge those gays running his campaign.
Posted on 02/18/2016 6:19:03 PM PST by Helicondelta
Adult film star Amy Lindsay, an actress featured in what became a controversial Ted Cruz presidential campaign ad, has serious disdain for the Clintons.
In a new tell-all interview with the Daily Caller, Lindsay explained her sentiment and went after former President Bill Clinton for his history of sexual baggage, saying he "destroyed real lives."
"Bill Clinton had real sex with real people, it destroyed real lives," she said, adding that what she did on camera was different, because she participated in consensual, simulated acts.
But the fact that Hillary is even being considered a legitimate candidate for president is what Lindsay said "blows" her mind.
She said, "All of her stuff that woman has been involved in, to me, is just disgraceful, absolutely disgraceful, and you know, in light of all of this, the emails and our national security and all of this other stuff, the fact that she's running for president blows my mind."
According to the Daily Caller, Lindsay's animosity for Clinton stems from "Clinton's defense of an accused child rapist in 1975 and her role in destroying the accuser's reputation."
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Cruz shouldn’t have removed the ads.
Well, at least he is going after the Clintons now.
I thought he was afraid.
Before all the trump-upsters get in here with whatever snide remarks they may make re Cruz and personnel used for ad, they need to review the Trump house first on the issue of porn. After all, tis Trump Hotels which moved Trump himself into the porno-peddling industry...with pay-per-view porn elevating him no higher than the sleazy porn theaters that used to dot urban landscapes in pre-Internet days.
I watched the CNN interview with actress Amy Lindsey and she is an attractive and articulate conservative woman.
Agreed. He could have appealed that we’re all sinners.
“they need to review the Trump house first”
I thought it was a very strange response from someone who made the cornerstone of his compaign that he is a Christian, to fire a woman from a legitimate job, after knowing of her past was not good.
It did not strike me as charitable or redemptive. It was an opportunity to be an authentic Christian passed by.
I think we all know Trump is what he is. Doesn’t excuse it, but it is known.
After reading this story, This woman has a ton of courage...
She calls herself Conservative.
Sounds like she may very well be in some tangible ways.
She sure does have a ton of courage, being in the business she was in she would have to have developed a really thick skin!!! Good on her for telling it like it is!!! Unlike the HOOKERS FOR HILLARY!!!!!
No kidding. Never back down, always double down. You would think he would have learned that from Trump by now.
I don’t watch CNN but what I’ve seen of her, I agree.
Definitely above the HforH crowd.
I saw an interview too, possibly the same one, and she was very level headed.
She didn’t unload on the Cruz folks.
I think that might have been forgiven being canned and all. She didn’t take it personally.
She seemed like a decent person, knowing what we know. The interviewer stated she wasn’t what you would call a conventional porn start, that her jobs had been far less than what most people would think of as porn. It was for cable and seemed to involve acting more than a pure sex production. I’ve never seen her, so I don’t know.
It was an interesting interview, and I thought she represented herself very well, at the expense of nobody.
Gotta wonder if Teds groundgame can overcome the bad advice/decisions he’s getting on the campaign
100% not guilty, Cruz needs to purge those gays running his campaign.
The “ad” was “controversial” only to the fools who fell for the “hype” about a “voice” (without a face or identity). It could have been Grandma Moses and nobody would have known, or cared.
Some people fall for this crap like an alcoholic for a bottle of booze.
From what I’ve read here she wasn’t so much a porno artist as an exhibitionist, unless you consider SI’s swimsuit edition porn.
And she sounds like she has a good head in her shoulders. But where are the photos? ;-0
I trust your judgment, AMPU, to correct me if I'm wrong on this...but my understanding of most ads ...
...aside from the ones where you have an ongoing "host" type of person...Progressive & At&t ads come to mind...
...is that once the performer completes their role in doing the ad, they're done.
They get paid no more or no less than what they contracted for before the camera.
So isn't "fire" an overblown word in this case?
What? Was she some ongoing "ambassador" of the ad she previously performed?
Cruz didn't come in & yank her away from the camera.
So. If I'm wrong, please correct me. But if I'm right, I think to accuse Cruz of "firing" somebody who had already completed her active role borders on rumor-mongering & is character-demeaning.
Colofornian,
Glad to see you around here again!
“So isn’t “fire” an overblown word in this case? “
I believe she was contracted to act in 5 ads. I’ve not seen that she was paid. Just fired. If not paid, I think Cruz missed a huge opportunity to demonstrate and explain redemption and compassion.
If you have more, please post away! :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.