| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 02/09/2016 11:35:51 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 02/09/2016 6:51:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
If you seek to understand Barack Obama and his views, the best place to go is his speeches. But you have to read them in their entirety, not rely on hearing them or on the media's summary of them. When you do, you come to realize how often what Obama says is morally and intellectually confused and even untrue.
The most recent example was his speech last week at a mosque in Baltimore. In addition to reassuring Muslim Americans that they are as American as Americans of every other faith -- a point that any president, Republican or Democrat, would and should make -- President Obama spoke a lot of nonsense, some of it dangerous nonsense.
President Obama: "So let's start with this fact: For more than a thousand years, people have been drawn to Islam's message of peace. And the very word itself, ‘Islam,' comes from ‘salam' -- peace."
Why did Mr. Obama say this? Even Muslim websites acknowledge that "Islam" means "submission" [to Allah], that it comes from the Arabic root "aslama" meaning submission, and that "Islam" is the command form of that verb.
That's why "Muslim" means "One who submits," not "One who is peaceful."
Obama: "Jefferson and John Adams had their own copies of the Koran."
The primary, if not only, reason Jefferson had a copy of the Koran was to try to understand the Koran and Islam in light of what the Muslim ambassador from Tripoli had told him and John Adams. When asked why Tripoli pirates were attacking American ships and enslaving Americans, the Muslim ambassador explained that Muslims are commanded to do so by the Koran.
Jefferson wrote that the Tripoli ambassador told him that "it was written in their Koran that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman [Muslim] who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to Paradise."
That's why Jefferson and Adams had Korans.
Given this reason, why did the president mention that Jefferson and Adams owned copies of the Koran?
Obama: "And how do we move forward together? . . . It can't be just a burden on the Muslim community -- although the Muslim community has to play a role."
Most Americans would say that the American-Muslim community has to play the role, not "a" role in preventing violent Islam from capturing the minds of American Muslims and in helping authorities identify extremist Muslims.
Obama: "Second, as Americans, we have to stay true to our core values, and that includes freedom of religion for all faiths."
This is so obviously true that one wonders why the president felt it necessary to mention it. Who doesn't believe that Muslim Americans should have the freedom to practice their faith?
Obama: "There are Christians who are targeted now in the Middle East, despite having been there for centuries, and there are Jews who've lived in places like France for centuries who now feel obliged to leave because they feel themselves under assault -- sometimes by Muslims."
One would have expected that after mentioning "Christians targeted now in the Middle East," he would have mentioned "Jews targeted now in the Middle East." That, however, would presumably have been too controversial to say to Muslims, even Muslim Americans. So, the president mentioned the many Jews in France "who now feel obliged to leave" their country because "they feel themselves under assault." And then came the corker: "sometimes by Muslims."
Sometimes? French Jews have recently been murdered, tortured, and harassed more than at any time since the Holocaust. And virtually every one of those attacks has been perpetrated by Muslims.
Obama: "We have to be consistent in condemning hateful rhetoric and violence against everyone. And that includes against Muslims here in the United States of America."
Two facts are relevant here. One is that religious hate crimes are exceedingly rare in America. The other is that in 2014, the last year for which we have data, Jews were targets of hate crimes four times more frequently than Muslims.
Obama: "I often hear it said that we need moral clarity in this fight. And the suggestion is somehow that if I would simply say, these are all Islamic terrorists, then we would actually have solved the problem by now, apparently."
Almost every time the president has given a talk, he has made extensive use of the straw man -- a false target that he then attacks and destroys. This is one such example. No one has ever said that if the president were merely to identify Islamic terrorists by name instead of nameless "violent extremists," "we would actually have solved the problem by now."
What drives most Americans crazy is that the president of the United States refuses to name the enemy. And this rewriting of reality filters down to many American institutions. Increasingly, for example, when (and if) 9/11 is taught in American schools, those who attacked America that day are never identified as Muslims.
Obama: "And, by the way, the notion that America is at war with Islam ignores the fact that the world's religions are a part of who we are."
Another straw man. No American of any stature has said that "America is at war with Islam."
Obama: "We can't be at war with any other religion because the world's religions are a part of the very fabric of the United States, our national character."
It is no insult to any religion to note that this statement is just false. The "world's religions" are not "part of the very fabric of the United States." Are Buddhism and Hinduism, for example? Of course not. Nor is Islam. America was founded by Christians rooted in the Jewish Scriptures. Adherents of every religion in the world have become productive American citizens, but only Christianity and Judaism have composed the very fabric of "our national character."
Obama: "In the discussion I had before I came out, some people said, Why is there always a burden on us? When a young man in Charleston shoots African Americans in a church, there's not an expectation that every white person in America suddenly is explaining that they're not racist."
This point alone should have been publicized by the media -- that the president of the United States tells Muslims that they have no moral obligation to condemn violence committed by Muslims in the name of Islam.
Obama: "American Muslims are better positioned than anybody to show that it is possible to be faithful to Islam . . . and to believe in democracy."
That is actually true. Given that theocracy, not democracy, is a central tenet of Islam, if an Islam compatible with democracy ever develops, it will probably develop in America.
Obama: "These are the voices of Muslim scholars, some of whom join us today, who know Islam has a tradition of respect for other faiths."
Another falsehood. Islam has no such tradition. Islam has always demanded that Jews and Christians be treated as humiliated second-class citizens -- when not forced to choose between conversion and death.
Now you know what President Obama said at the Islamic Society of Baltimore. But if you just read or listened to the mainstream media, you would have missed it because none of this was reported. It was all about, as the headline in USAToday put it, "At Baltimore mosque, Obama condemns anti-Muslim bigotry."
-- Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. His latest book, The Ten Commandments: Still the Best Moral Code, was published by Regnery. He is the founder of Prager University and may be contacted at dennisprager.com. © 2016 Creators.com
Once you understand that Obama is not on our side, everything he does makes perfect sense. If he comes out in five or ten years and announces that he has been a secret Muslim all along, Muslims worldwide will hail him as the greatest Islamic leader since Suleiman the Magnificent, if not Mohammed himself.
Obama and all faithful Koran-abiding Muslims would have a great laugh together at how easy it was to fool the naïve and gullible kaffir infidels. Why? Because it’s written right in the Koran that Muslims have the duty to lie to infidels in order to promote the spread of Islam.
We are such fools. Now we will pay the price, beginning in Europe with the Great Jihad of 2016.
fyi:
“The primary, if not only, reason Jefferson had a copy of the Koran was to try to understand the Koran and Islam in light of what the Muslim ambassador from Tripoli had told him and John Adams. When asked why Tripoli pirates were attacking American ships and enslaving Americans, the Muslim ambassador explained that Muslims are commanded to do so by the Koran.
Jefferson wrote that the Tripoli ambassador told him that “it was written in their Koran that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman [Muslim] who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to Paradise.”
That’s why Jefferson and Adams had Korans.”
Prissy faced, pansy ass muslim who is our president.................... Thank all those who didn't vote in the last election.
Same thing will happen this year ...
Of course not.
1) All African Americans already know that all whites are racist.
2. It was all those gun owners that are the problem.
(/sarc)
Good point....the America-hating ding-a-ling in the WH hasn/t a clue.
We know which side he’s on, and it’s not ours.
Who doesn’t believe that Muslim Americans should have the freedom to practice their faith?
Since jihad is the Eucharist of Islam, I do not believe that Muslim Americans should have the freedom to practice their faith.
Obama: “We have to be consistent in condemning hateful rhetoric and violence against everyone. And that includes against Muslims here in the United States of America.”
U.N. resolution 1618 would made slander against Islam, and only Islam, a crime.
Another straw man. No American of any stature has said that “America is at war with Islam.”
Islam is in the dawah, or preparatory, stage of jihad. Until we submit, we are at war, which means forever.
“...When a young man in Charleston shoots African Americans in a church, there’s not an expectation that every white person in America suddenly is explaining that they’re not racist.”
This is the opposite of true. After the Charleston shooting, “white America” was bullied into condemning and extirpating the Confederate flag, specifically because it was an alleged symbol of “racism” and “white supremacism”.
Oh, he has a clue. The clue is that Americans, especially their politicians are too politically correct to berate a minority _resident on his Marxist anti-American posture. He knows exactly what he is doing and where in hell he wants to take whitey!
If Bernie wins, we will again be giving our heartfelt thanks to all those faux conservative whiners who once more stayed home in some fit of anguish just to prove some arcane point.
“When a young man in Charleston shoots African Americans in a church, there’s not an expectation that every white person in America suddenly is explaining that they’re not racist.”
Oh, that’s just bull pucky. Every time a son of 0bama attacks and pulverizes a white person, the white person has to explain that they are not really racist. Kind of like “Islamophpobia.”
Obama should go down in history as the “Straw-man president.” He is the master of these arguments.
"Let's dispel this notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing," Rubio said. "He is trying to change this country."
"Let's dispel this notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing," Rubio said. "He is trying to change this country."
"Let's dispel this notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing," Rubio said. "He is trying to change this country."
The right to vote also includes the right not to vote; if, for whatever reason, you are not prepared to vote intelligently, you should stay home. If you cannot, in good conscience, vote for any of the candidates on the ballot, that is also your right to stay home. However, all that being said, of course you have the duty to carefully examine the candidates and the issues, and make the best decision you can. And if that means a third party vote, that too is a matter of conscience and not to be condemned. The idea that you must vote for one of two very evil, very corrupt candidates, is very little different from that of the communist totalitarian states, that force you to the polls under very severe penalties to vote cast your ballot for the one-party dictators.
Great imitation of Marco Rubio.
Hope you are here all week!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.