Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transportation funding expected to fall $6B short in Pennsylvania
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | February 1, 2016 | Melissa Daniels

Posted on 02/08/2016 12:54:21 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Pennsylvania will be about $6 billion short of being able to fund all the projects legislators promised their constituents during passage of Act 89, the transportation funding bill of 2013.

Secretary Leslie Richards will break the news to the Senate Transportation Committee when she testifies Tuesday, according to a copy of her testimony obtained by the Tribune-Review.

Pennsylvania's 12-year transportation plan covers about 2,800 projects at a cost of about $34 billion. But that exceeds the $28 billion in revenue projected to come in for that time frame.

“The Corbett administration over promised projects by at least $6 billion compared to projections of available revenue the next 12 years following Act 89,” Richards' testimony reads. “Absent a legislative solution, a number of these project(sic) may not advance in the next 12 years.”

Act 89, passed by legislative leaders in November 2013, raised PennDOT fees and opened up fuel prices to tax increases to get more money for state transportation projects. Its passage marked the pinnacle of Republican Gov. Tom Corbett's legislative accomplishments but stirred dissatisfaction among his base because of the increased taxes.

Corbett and his team lobbied for months. Among their efforts was a “Decade of Investment” website promoting what projects could be funded. The bill passed with bipartisan support.

Richard's testimony notes that the website included this caveat: “Obviously, the final list will depend upon the actual legislated revenue if a bill is passed and signed by the Governor.”

The State Transportation Commission in August 2014 approved the latest 12-year plan that outlines future projects. The list is available online via PennDOT's interactive map, which says which House and Senate districts the projects are in. The plan is updated every two years.

Richards maintains the funding situation is not a product of the current administration. Legislators, her testimony says, have come to her with concerns about why projects in their districts are not moving, which she says is a matter of funds.

“Governor Wolf and I are moving projects you and your constituents expect, within the resources we are given,” her testimony reads.

Steve Miskin, spokesman for the House Republicans, wasn't familiar with legislative concerns or Richards' testimony but said it sounded like “stereotypical” Democratic pleas.

“It's just the stereotypical Democratic response, ‘We want more money,' ” he said. “There's gonna be a lot of anger.”

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, said he had not seen Richards' testimony but wasn't surprised to hear that funds could fall short compared to a wish list.

“We knew that back when the previous governor did his previous transportation plan,” Costa said.

Even Act 89, which would create $2.3 billion in new funds by its fifth year, wasn't the $3.2 billion recommended by the Transportation Funding Advisory Commission from 2011.

Choosing which projects to fund with revenues available ought to be a matter of what is a safety priority, Costa said.

“You have to make sure they are fixing those roads that are the most in need of repair,” he said, “That needs to be No. 1 priority.”

The hearing will focus on “the delay and delivery of transportation projects.” Representatives of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Associated Pennsylvania Constructions, America Council of Engineering Companies of Pennsylvania, the Public Utility Commission, the Department of Environmental Protection and numerous representatives from the utility industry are expected to attend.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: act89; democrats; funding; gastax; gop; highwayprojects; penndot; pennsylvania; republicans; revenues; safety; shortfall; taxes; tomcorbett; transportation

1 posted on 02/08/2016 12:54:22 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Even after jacking up gasoline prices by 28 cents a gallon, there still isn’t enough money for the pork projects from our Uniparty politicians here in PA.

Boo-hoo.......


2 posted on 02/08/2016 12:56:41 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS: REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

The gasoline tax increase is a pass-through from uncapping a tax on oil. Oil prices go down, the effective gas tax does, too. Hence, less revenue.


3 posted on 02/08/2016 12:58:01 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The politicians deserve what’s happening to their pet ‘infrastructure’ projects.


4 posted on 02/08/2016 1:01:38 AM PST by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS: REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Is PA really $6B short? What to do?

Raising taxes seems to be the responsible necessity. /s


5 posted on 02/08/2016 1:25:59 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Maybe they should have thought about that when their new Governor banned fracking on public lands. That oil would have gone a long way towards making up the shortfall...


6 posted on 02/08/2016 1:30:01 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

No thanks.


7 posted on 02/08/2016 2:12:32 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

We scoot out to Lehigh Valley every so often from LI. Our choices are either 78 or 80. Both highways are in good condition. What areas are hurting for funding?


8 posted on 02/08/2016 2:21:27 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

So what will Democrat governor Tom Wolf do? Play Grinch and cut some projects? Or raise taxes yet again? Hmmm?


9 posted on 02/08/2016 2:29:13 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Fresh from the South in my youth.. I just couldn’t see why turnpike ppl paid for the same stretch of asphalt daily.. Thousands of times. I pondered did they bring back their empty milk jugs and pay full price again? I asked about it and got a blank.. You’re a stupid southerner stare.. Didn’t answer my question though. Now the toll roads are everywhere.


10 posted on 02/08/2016 3:05:23 AM PST by momincombatboots (Trump... The only Democrat who can win. Well played democrats. Mr single payer 2000!? Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This must be a mistake, since we were told if we accepted the onerous 28 cents a gallon increase on fuel to lead the nation in fuel taxes, we would have more than enough to fund our roads.


11 posted on 02/08/2016 3:16:54 AM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

A big issue in Pennsylvania right now is bridges. PA has a lot of very old roads, and the state’s weather — especially in the higher elevations that cover most of the state — makes road and bridge maintenance very expensive.


12 posted on 02/08/2016 3:34:09 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

AH! TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS: The most efficient government projects where 1 man digs a hole and 8 watch.

I can’t imagine even thinking that there would be mismanagement and waste going on with these projects.

/Sarc


13 posted on 02/08/2016 4:17:47 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

You must have been cut-off during posting...

still isn’t enough money for the pork projects from our Uniparty politicians here in PA...to their unions kick-back buddies.

Hey, why not raise another toll/two? Hell, I was GIDDY to pay $5 to get out of Jersey over the Franklin; I’d but as just getting out of PA (if I ever go back home).


14 posted on 02/08/2016 9:49:20 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

If you head north from there you’ll find most roads are more pothole than pavement. But I find it hard to believe there is a lack of funds.


15 posted on 02/09/2016 8:38:44 AM PST by TooBusy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson