Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Accountability for Lesbians at the Veterans Benefits Administration
Coach Is Right ^ | 1/30/2016 | Jim Emerson

Posted on 01/30/2016 4:48:46 AM PST by HomerBohn

Not only are IRS executives above the law, so are executives in the Veteran's Affairs (VA) business. A Chicago appeals judge has reversed The Department of Veterans' Affairs demotion of one of two senior executives who allegedly misused their positions to rip off over $400,000 from American taxpayers. Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) senior executives Diana Rubens and Kimberly Graves abused the authority of their positions to relocate to cushy jobs with the same salary and hefty relocation expenses. (1)

Diana Rubens and Kimberly Graves were demoted as a result of a VA inspector general report that found the VBA spent $1.8 million to relocate 23 executives in two years. Acting inspector general reported last September that "Rubens, the director of Veteran's Benefits Administration's Philadelphia Regional Office, and Graves, the director of the VBA's St. Paul Regional Office, had "inappropriately used their positions of authority for personal and financial benefit." The two zeroed in on the less demanding jobs of two subordinates, forced them out of their positions and then placed themselves in those jobs at higher pay. The two knew the VA would be more than happy to pay more than $400,000 for their relocations.

Congress is looking into the abuse by VBA executives to land easy jobs and perks as part of a general investigation of VA misconduct. The House Armed Services Committee subpoenaed Danny Pummill, acting undersecretary for benefits, Diana Rubens and Kimberly Graves. Mimicking corrupt IRS executives, Rubens and Graves asserted their Fifth Amendment rights under the Constitution to protect themselves against self-incrimination.

Instead of firing the two for unethical behavior they were demoted. The VA then botched the demotion process by not providing the accused with all of the documents. The demotion was the first attempt but it had to be rescinded, Rubens and Graves kept their salary. In an effort to avoid the wrath of Congress VA oversight director Ryan Hedgepeth announced that the agency promises to reinstate the demotions after repairing a paperwork SNAFU that allowed the administrative judge to reverse the Administration's demotions. Lawmakers and veteran's advocates had been critical of the VA for not firing the women from the start and charged that the agency's inability to handle the demotions further demonstrated a need for accountability reform. (1)

The Administration then demoted the two for a second time. "Graves and Rubens were demoted in November and reassigned to new posts as deputy directors in different cities at lower pay"

Didn't last long This week an administrative judge reversed the demotion of Kim Graves, director of the St. Paul, Minnesota regional benefits office. Diana Rubens is waiting on her fate. In both cases, the women were brought up on charges less severe than those recommended in the initial VA Inspector General's report. There is the possibility they may face criminal prosecution, but probably not. The VA, like the IRS, has a policy of "No accountability."

So what's the real story? According to a report published by MilitaryCorruption.com, there is far more going on "behind the scenes" than is likely to be discussed in the national media. Editor in Chief Glenn MacDonald writes:

"Observers want to know if Rubens will take her reputed live-in lover Kimberly Beale with her. Those in the know say Rubens and Beale have been an item ever since they met at the infamous Phoenix V.A. There, Beale was a lowly GS-7, but documents show the younger woman soon leapfrogged over others and ended up a GS-15 only eight years later."

And why should the fact that the pair are lesbians have any bearing on the case? MilitaryCorruption provides the answer: "What once would have been the kiss of death to a federal career, now is about the most iron-clad "insurance policy" against dismissal one could have."

After all, remember whose Department of Justice will be charging the two with wrongdoing!

Diana Rubens

Kimberly Graves


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lesbians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Lesbians and homosexuals are not only a protected sub-species, but they are exalted by the phony president on down the line.

A good president would begin work slashing and eliminating many government agencies and bureaucrats, but the firing should start with all the perverts. These two evil examples of perversion should have been sentenced to long years AT HARD LABOR/

1 posted on 01/30/2016 4:48:46 AM PST by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I think it is going to be a long, slow slog at getting OURSELVES in line with the will of God before we can even hope to address that kind of evil in that way; but perhaps by that time the gospel presence in the land will have rendered the issue moot. If complaining about the flu epidemic but not watching your own sanitation, it seems kind of perverse too.


2 posted on 01/30/2016 4:54:08 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

” pay more than $400,000 for their relocations”

No wonder we’re $19 trillion in debt!


3 posted on 01/30/2016 4:58:27 AM PST by navet97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navet97

Would nepotism be any better if it was “straight”?


4 posted on 01/30/2016 4:59:40 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: navet97

Kind of like reparations for past abuses.


5 posted on 01/30/2016 5:04:25 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

That might be one rationale brought up, but it goes far beyond any reason. This is a sign of something egged on by the devil.


6 posted on 01/30/2016 5:08:12 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

No, but it would most likely be duly prosecuted.


7 posted on 01/30/2016 5:10:20 AM PST by Shoefus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

LOL! “Reason? They don’t need no stinkin’ reason.”


8 posted on 01/30/2016 5:12:39 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Just more of CONgress REFUSING to do their Sworn Duty!

This is where inherent contempt comes in. From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/opinion/04tue4.html?_r=0

and of course this is what the Radical Left thinks:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2007/04/house_arrest.html


9 posted on 01/30/2016 5:31:03 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Homosexuals are SPECIAL!! So are MUSLIMS and Hispanics!! So are BLACKS!! Hell, the only people who have to follow the rules and laws are WHITES!


10 posted on 01/30/2016 5:38:17 AM PST by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Damn..... Kim has Megan hair


11 posted on 01/30/2016 5:47:39 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Wow, after looking at those two pictures I may have to rethink my position about not allowing women into combat.


12 posted on 01/30/2016 5:49:48 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

What good does it do to fire them when the courts will just reinstate them?

I hope the new president goes to work on the court system too.


13 posted on 01/30/2016 6:49:37 AM PST by jch10 (Hillary in the Big House, not the White House .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

This should not be a surprise to anyone. Homosexuals have colonized all branches of the Federal Government. They gravitate to agencies where their deviant lifestyle is protected by Law, Directives and Orders. Their numbers in Government Agencies far exceed those within the general population. They strengthen their hand daily by hiring and recruiting other homosexuals. Their desire is to become the ruling class and their first conquest will be Federal, State and Local Government Agencies. As a learning experience; just go into an American Embassy and you will swear that 25% of the staff is queer.

Just wait until you see how this works within the Armed Forces. This protected class will dramatically reduce the “Warfighting Capability” of the Uniformed Services.


14 posted on 01/30/2016 6:56:37 AM PST by Gunner TLW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Try prosecuting the tax evasion angle.
That overrides corrupt agency actions.


15 posted on 01/30/2016 7:22:41 AM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner TLW

I agree.


16 posted on 01/30/2016 7:26:15 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gunner TLW

They also did the same in the Catholic Church, which is why the pedophiles are protected.


17 posted on 01/30/2016 7:26:49 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Keep all lesbos and homos out of the VA. The veterans have enough to worry about without having to deal with nature’s freaks.


18 posted on 01/30/2016 8:10:21 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Lesbians have Soldierphobia.


19 posted on 01/30/2016 8:45:14 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Lesbians have Soldierphobia

Based on what one of my nephews (who's on the USS Stennis) told me, there's a fair number of lesbians in the US Navy who aren't phobic of their fellow mates on board.

20 posted on 01/30/2016 8:48:07 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson