Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helicondelta

No, not really. The serious candidates were debating.


4 posted on 01/28/2016 8:45:36 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TBP

Chickens in a yard debate better.


6 posted on 01/28/2016 8:47:32 PM PST by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

I’m so glad the serious candidates were debating.

Meanwhile I watched a wonderful rally where $6 million plus was raised for our vets. It was so much more heartwarming and real than any debate imo.

We’ve heard at least six times what the candidates positions are, I’m sure they hit them again tonight. Oh, did they even mention vets?


9 posted on 01/28/2016 8:49:47 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
The serious candidates were debating.

You mean the 'serious' candidates who can't get over 2% in the polls?

Real serious......

12 posted on 01/28/2016 8:50:48 PM PST by The Iceman Cometh (Trumpbots Vs. Cruznadians - the struggle is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

Yeah, such serious candidates polling at 10%. /drippy-drippy-sarcasm


15 posted on 01/28/2016 8:51:26 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

It was a bunch of talk-talk about who supported what and when. Boring. Kaisch met a Belgian guy once on his dad’s mail-route. Or was it milk route? I can’t get it straight. Sounded like a bunch of boring old men.


17 posted on 01/28/2016 8:53:56 PM PST by abigkahuna (Here now and whatever....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

“Debating” in this case means jumping thru the pre-determined hoops held by the Moderators and speaking and shutting up when they are allowed to. That’s not “debate”, it’s an ad-supported television event.

Trump on the other hand, paid the bill himself, including a $1 million donation to veterans, had the time of his life surrounded by friends, family, amazing warriors, and even two competitors.

If the goal was to score debate points, then Jeb probalby won, especially if he threw in a little Spanish lingo

IF the goal was to win hearts and minds of voters, Trump walked away with it.

Just look at Drudge, he’s not even asking “who won the debate” anymore.


18 posted on 01/28/2016 8:54:36 PM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first ande then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP
The serious candidates were debating.

They could not have been very serious if all anyone is talking about is how Trump won when he was not even there.

Let that sink in for a while. Heck, let it fester and stink. Then Vote Trump 2016!

24 posted on 01/28/2016 9:10:50 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: TBP

All career politicians on stage...ALL TALK, NO ACTION!

Shame on professional politicians puppets of their
ultra rich donors. They stab us in the back again and again.!


31 posted on 01/28/2016 9:33:50 PM PST by entropy12 (Trump - NOT funded by Goldman Sachs. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson