Posted on 01/27/2016 11:49:36 AM PST by Enlightened1
Canada or Cuba.
You arfe another one with a stack of misinformation. I’d hardly call supporting Ronald Reagan supporting socialism. In fact, you should check out Ted Cruz’s votes for socialism - TPP, H-1B visa increases (which he has flip flopped on now), his taking of money from big banks who have an agenda. I marvel at the political ignorance of some on this forum.
The charlatan in this case is Canadian-born Cruz who didn’t know he was a dual citizen until 2014. Look at how he has weaseled his votes in the Senate - then get back to us on who the charlatan is. Just because someone can debate doesn’t mean squat. It hasn’t helped St. Teddy Bear, Soccer Ball, Canadian-born Cruz in the Senate -has it? NOPE
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?Matthew 8:36
Oh my, you Cruzobts are totally ignorant aren’t you? They aren’t allowed to do a one-on-one - if they do - then they will be barred from further debates. They have to have RNC permission, and that isn’t happening. Cruz is too dumb to know that.
Trump took over a $200 million real-estate-development business from his father, Fred Trump, in 1974. Dáte estimates that Trump’s share of the empire — he has three siblings — was $40 million.[6]
My point, if you had any reading comprehension skill, was that he got his start from his father’s wealth, that if he had just invested the money he got in 1974 in the S&P, he would have as much wealth today as he claims he has ($8.7 billion), and that he had the advantage of connections and education that 99% of the rest of the population did not have.
As for envy, pointing out Trump’s history in not indicative of envy. Success can mean different things to different people. To me having three wives is not indicative of success, employing one’s kids in the family business is not how I define success. Finally, denigrating on a personal level those who disagree with me is the last thing I would use to define a successful person.
If we were that ignorant then we would be Trumpers.
They aren't allowed to do a one-on-one - if they do - then they will be barred from further debates.
Then let the RNC bar them from future debates? Does Trump really want to share the stage and time Carly Fiorino or Rand Paul or Chis Christie? Face it, it's a two man race - Trump vs. Cruz. Why not make it one-on-one debates and screw the RNC? Do you honestly think that any network wouldn't jump at the chance to host them, sanctioned event or not?
They have to have RNC permission, and that isn't happening.
So Donald Trump is meekly abiding by the RNC directives? Really? Trump has said the RNC doesn't owe him anything so why not stick it to them and take Cruz on alone? Or is he more afraid of the RNC than he is of Ted Cruz?
Canadian-born Cruz, who was born to a U.S. citizen, which makes him a natural-born citizen. I recall how Trump was booed when he brought up this ridiculous "birther" nonsense.
Poor Ted Cruz.
In Canada, they don’t differentiate between winning an academic debate on points and winning the hearts of the audience as the true winner in a Presidential election.
Ted got schlonged while doing as good a job as he can. Trump’s polling numbers went up.
Ted got schlonged 6 times. Every time, Trump’s polling numbers went up.
Now Ted wants a “private debate” with Trump.
Really, what else can he do? He’s pretty far behind.
Every human being has a few screw-ups. The one vote was based on Mitch’s promise that no deal was made on Ex-Im. BUT, has Ted donated to Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Clinton, Rendell, Crist, etc, etc?
I have no clue why anyone trusts Donald Trump. Does anyone have a reason to believe that Trump will appoint judges who will faithfully execute their duties to honor the Constitution? No.
I like your style.
He did take him on in the last debate and handed his butt to him - as did Rubio. You people seem to think that debating is allthere is - Cruz has accomplished absolutely nothing during his term thus far in the Senate. Let’s compare that to what Trump has built - no contest. So, you can shove your debater where the sun doesn’t shine. I’ll take someone who is a man of action - not a sleazy lawyer. Debating is all you got? Pitiful.
I suspect a one on one debate would look like the end of Quigely Down Under. “This ain’t Dodge City, and you ain’t Wild Bill Hickok.”
Sorry, he isn’t a natural born citizen - no matter how you try to spin it. The crowd was booing Cruz - not Trump. Get your facts straight. Cruz isn’t eligible to be President or VP either. You can’t bend the constitution to fit your candidate - as much as you’d like to.
Here’s the rub - Cruz was told by all his staffers that McConnell was lying and he refused to listen to them. That shows me he thinks he knows it all. He later signed on with McConnell’s pack to take out conservatives in the 2014 elections. Get your facts straight about your lily-pure-as the driven-snow candidate. He’s a charlatan. Seems he also screwed up when he didn’t report his bank loans on his FEC filing, or when he didn’t know he had health insurance. Give me a break!! A father with 2 little girls and a wife doesn’t know he has health insurance for them? Sounds like there is a bridge in Brooklyn you might want to buy.
You claim to know that he loves it. You are the one who claims to be up on the facts. It is your baby to worry about, not mine. Want to believe falsehood, believe falsehood.
Now that is just Fantasyland. They were definitely booing Trump, no question about it. A child born to a U.S. citizen is a natural-born citizen, even if the parent happens to be out of the country at the time of the birth (see McCain). Trump is grasping at straws.
No, like in the Bellei case, citizen by act of Congress taking his parentage into account in spite of his foreign birth. A citizenship like that can be lost, therefore is not natural born. Or so saith our Nine Solons, who for lack of a better mechanism currently serve as the Last Word per the Constitution.
To lump this together with the Obama “birther” situation (once Hawaii coughed up a birth certificate, even if they used Photoshop off of another one in order to make it look real purty) is a legal mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.