Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EST,WOR AM,January 25,2016
The EIB Network ^
| January 25,2016
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 01/25/2016 8:57:20 AM PST by Biggirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-148 next last
To: Sensei Ern
Long ago, my friend. Long ago.
To: LachlanMinnesota
I read that in one poll Jeb! is at 1% in Iowa.
Slow and steady, like a turtle.
62
posted on
01/25/2016 10:35:33 AM PST
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Maybe, Joe Willie comes to mind
To: LachlanMinnesota
Trump’s 11 point surge must be the Palin endorsement?
Brilliant Rush! I can see liberal heads exploding from my house!
64
posted on
01/25/2016 10:36:33 AM PST
by
Clint N. Suhks
(Two Corinthians walk into a bar...)
To: LachlanMinnesota
1980-1990
1990-2000
2000-2010?
65
posted on
01/25/2016 10:37:56 AM PST
by
Sensei Ern
(Bonnie and Khalid. Islamic terrorists, not workplace violence.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
A turtle is the fastest thing on earth if everything on earth is asleep at the same time
To: Sensei Ern
three strikes - you are out!
To: Biggirl
Donald
"EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" Trump WILL STAB YOU IN THE BACK !
Someone submitted 'Your Handy, Dandy Trump Vs. Cruz Comparison Chart !'
Ponder this .
Donald Trump and Eminent Domain, August 22nd, 2015
... More, Trump has publicly defended the confiscation of private property for eminent domain, even when the use for which the property is confiscated is purely private in nature:
Trump consistently defended the use of eminent domain.
Interviewed by John Stossel on ABC News, he said:"Cities have the right to condemn for the good of the city.
Everybody coming into Atlantic City sees this terrible house instead of staring at beautiful fountains and beautiful other things that would be good."
Challenged by Stossel, he saidthat eminent domain was necessary to build schools and roads.
But of course he just wanted to build a limousine parking lot.
Once again, this is Donald Trump's vision of private property rights when he was just another private citizen.
Imagine how much more damage he could do as the leader of the Federal executive branch.
Thomas Sowell called it CORRECTLY !
...Trump boasts that he can make deals, among his many other boasts.
But is a deal-maker what this country needs at this crucial time?
Is not one of the biggest criticisms of today's Congressional Republicansthat they have made all too many deals with Democrats,betraying the principles on which they ran for office?
Bipartisan deals -- so beloved by media pundits -- have produced some of the great disasters in American history.
Contrary to the widespread viewthat the Great Depression of the 1930s was caused by the stock market crash of 1929,
unemployment never reached double digits in any of the 12 months that followed the stock market crash in October, 1929.
Unemployment was 6.3 percent in June 1930 when a Democratic Congress and a Republican president made a bipartisan deal that produced the Smoot-Hawley tariffs.
Within 6 months, unemployment hit double digits --and stayed in double digits throughout the entire decade of the 1930s.
You want deals?There was never a more politically successful deall than that which Neville Chamberlain made in Munich in 1938.He was hailed as a hero, not only by his own party but even by opposition parties, when he returned with a deal that Chamberlain said meant "peace for our time."
But, just one year later, the biggest, bloodiest and most ghastly war in history began.
If deal-making is your standard,didn't Barack Obama just make a deal with Iran --one that may have bigger and worse consequences than Chamberlain's deal?
What kind of deals would Donald Trump make?He has already praised the Supreme Court's decision in "Kelo v. City of New London" which saidthat the government can seize private property to turn it over to another private party.
That kind of decision is good for an operator like Donald Trump.
Doubtless other decisions that he would make as president would also be good for Donald Trump,
68
posted on
01/25/2016 10:40:46 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Biggirl
This caller has got to be a Cruz freeper. I have a new ideas who it might be!
69
posted on
01/25/2016 10:44:54 AM PST
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
To: TigerClaws
Rush just getting through letting a caller savage the Donald for views he has held in the past since that all some people will judge a candidate on. Neither are acknowledging the fact that Trump will undoubtedly weigh each and every issue on its own merit as it comes before him. Whatever he did in the past is just that. “In the past.”
Few seem to get that.
70
posted on
01/25/2016 10:48:30 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
To: LachlanMinnesota
Then, you saw how close to socialism we were after Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter. I’ve sern this scenario before.
71
posted on
01/25/2016 10:49:07 AM PST
by
Sensei Ern
(Bonnie and Khalid. Islamic terrorists, not workplace violence.)
To: rodguy911
Rodguy, i totally disagree. He will rule everything based on what the polls indicate. Polls manipulated by those with an agenda.
72
posted on
01/25/2016 10:51:37 AM PST
by
Sensei Ern
(Bonnie and Khalid. Islamic terrorists, not workplace violence.)
To: Sensei Ern
We’re closer to socialism than ever before, with 52% and 48% of the corrupt electorate voting this marxist-socialist-commie scumbag into office, twice. All that’s missing are armbands, house-to-house searches and firing squads.
To: Sensei Ern
Two steps forward, one step back.
If I want your $100.00, I will compromise at $50.00.
Next year, I will want your $50.00, but I will compromise and take $25.00.
You know, deal making.
Next year, I want your $25.00, but I’ll take $12.50.
The next year you just give me $12.50 because it’s not worth fighting over.
I want someone who says they want my $100.00 to say that rather than negotiating for a part of it, I want part of their $100.00.
Giving them half is losing by halves.
Taking from them is winning.
To: Yosemitest
You Cruzbots just have to spam every thread, don’t you
75
posted on
01/25/2016 11:00:13 AM PST
by
SMM48
To: miss marmelstein
He forgot to mention how silly birthers are.
76
posted on
01/25/2016 11:02:03 AM PST
by
TauntedTiger
(Jeb is low energy, Ted is low synergy.)
To: SMM48
To: Sensei Ern
I don’t think so. The Donald is loaded with common sense,that usually keeps one out of trouble.
Those who insist on using a political record that does not exist for Trump will be proven wrong.
78
posted on
01/25/2016 11:08:47 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
To: LachlanMinnesota
Somehow I don’t see that happening with Trump.He knows what we have now. I don’t see him settling for less.
79
posted on
01/25/2016 11:10:13 AM PST
by
rodguy911
(Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
To: rodguy911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson