Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martial law declared in New York City
World Net Daily ^ | 01/24/16

Posted on 01/25/2016 2:35:18 AM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: dp0622
"Stay off the road. We don't want to have to arrest you."

I know the chances are rare, however if someone in NYC had a tricked out 4 x 4 it could be an asset, the NYPD might even ask him to borrow it, ditto that a snowmobile.

In regards to Comrade De Blasio, that isn't his real name if you will he is 1/2 Italian, and obliviously he is not letting that strong point kick in ;-).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_de_Blasio

21 posted on 01/25/2016 3:55:43 AM PST by taildragger (Not my Monkey, not my Circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

>> Pretty thin gruel to be labeled “martial law.”

I guess we have to lighten up on DeBlasio here on the conservative forum, now that Donald Trump supports him. ;-)


22 posted on 01/25/2016 3:58:08 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If you outlaw driving in a snowstorm, then only criminals will drive in a snowstorm.

You can have my car after you pry my cold dead arse out of it!


23 posted on 01/25/2016 3:58:24 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
His mother was of Italian descent. Apparently his abusive dad left the scene early so he changed his last name to her maiden name which was Deblasio.

And besides, a travel ban during the blizzard is not martial law.

24 posted on 01/25/2016 4:00:02 AM PST by Sir_Humphrey (I farted on Bill Maher's pillow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Sorry. It wasn’t that good a rant, anyway. At least they didn’t spell it “Marshall” law.


25 posted on 01/25/2016 4:00:05 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
The point of the name change? To make him more electable.

He got somebody's vote. Lots of low information voters out there.

26 posted on 01/25/2016 4:01:35 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
I despise nanny-state government more than anyone, but the responses here on FreeRepublic are pathetic.

There was another long thread the other day about the National Guard getting called out to rescue hundreds of stranded motorists on the Pennsylvania Turnpike. On that thread, one of the complaints was that the highway WAS NOT closed down.

Go figure.

Get real, folks. This was a massive snowstorm that dropped 28+ inches of snow in the most densely populated place in the U.S. You can't plow streets, and fire/EMS can't respond to emergencies, if you have the streets blocked by thousands of cars stuck in the snow.

27 posted on 01/25/2016 4:33:19 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I was just going to write that. That can’t be enforced. I mean, didn’t the poster see the news videos of folks walking all around NY, throwing snowballs and sledding?


28 posted on 01/25/2016 4:38:02 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

He doesn’t support him, he said he would love the competition.


29 posted on 01/25/2016 4:42:57 AM PST by visualops (Why yes, I am on the #TrumpTrain. I'd like to win for a change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Nothing to get excited about for it is only a test to see if the meek, gullible and timid people of New York will actually go along with it.

The next “ emergency “ will be on election day and if the people were stupid enough to fall for the first “ emergency “ then it will be done again on election day.

In this case I don’t think of it as Martial Law but Lemming Law.

The boxcars will be loading at Gate 3 to take the lemmings to summer camp. It’s so nice that most don’t come back.


30 posted on 01/25/2016 4:48:21 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Driving is not a right. It is a privilege. That may be revoked whenever the state wants it revoked.

They cannot stop you for walking around.

Did you guys tak driver’s Ed?


31 posted on 01/25/2016 4:49:17 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

My favorite part is the FReepers who live in Texas or other southern states with no experience with snow emergencies who claim that such “curtailment of liberty” would never fly in their home state.

Banning motor vehicle travel during emergencies like this is simply common sense. In a better world, the authorities would not have to tell people that.


32 posted on 01/25/2016 4:50:06 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DH
The next "emergency" will be on election day and if the people were stupid enough to fall for the first "emergency" then it will be done again on election day.

Oh, right -- sure.

They already had this exact scenario unfold. September 11, 2001 happened to be the day of the primary elections in NYC.

1. The city government declared a state of emergency (for obvious reasons).

2. The election was postponed even though people began voting before the attack that morning.

3. They rescheduled the election a few weeks later, and it went off without a hitch.

33 posted on 01/25/2016 4:51:46 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

That is so far from the truth as to be just silly.

No one kept you in your house. They did limit driving ( which is not a “right”) and no one’s home was searched without permission of the owners.


34 posted on 01/25/2016 4:51:48 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
If you travel through the Dakotas on I-90 or I-94 in the summer months, one of the things you notice is that many highway interchanges have a set of bright yellow gates in the upright position. They close those roads during major blizzards frequently enough that it was worth their while to install gates at all the interchanges.

Oh, yeah ... that's "martial law" all right. LOL.

35 posted on 01/25/2016 4:54:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I was referring to the Boston bomber search, not the NY snowstorm.


36 posted on 01/25/2016 4:57:27 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I was referring to the Boston bomber search, not the NY snowstorm.

And you may have been too -- my point was just that the Boston bomber search was closer to martial law than the NYC emergency action, and even the Boston incident isn't close to martial law. On a scale of 0-100, NYC is a zero, and Boston was a 5 or 10.

37 posted on 01/25/2016 5:00:18 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Fair ‘nuff.

Boston was more hunkered down, rather than martialed down. But no one was keeping you off the streets, except in the areas where the two douchebags had been seen.

And no home or building was searched without the permission of the owner.

Bags were searched on the subway. Again, no one who refused was searched. They simply could not get on the train.

My Son in Law was one of the folks doing those searches.


38 posted on 01/25/2016 5:04:16 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Oh please...”Martial law”

Texas should adopt this during rare dowmpours so they’re not wasting time effort and risking and losing lives trying to rescue some clown drowning in a deep water road. But they cannot.


39 posted on 01/25/2016 5:19:42 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

We get a foot or two here on the east shore of Lake Ontario and nobody thinks anything of it. We navigate in white-out conditions and go on about our business.

Martial Law? This is Andrew Cuomo’s wet dream. I am surprised that they didn’t go house to house searching for guns, like they did after Katrina.


40 posted on 01/25/2016 5:40:20 AM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson