Posted on 01/24/2016 7:00:17 AM PST by Kaslin
I was watching a very angry conservative on TV the other day attempt to paint Trump as Satan's blonde-headed younger brother.
They also tried to make out anyone who claimed to be a conservative, that would ever remotely even consider voting for The Donald, to be the dumbest SOB on the planet... the bane of humanity.
This person was angry, peeps. It was scary, shark-eyed, weirdness. They were sold on Trump being evil incarnate.
The weird thing was, if my memory serves me correctly, I don't remember this talking head getting that irate about Romney in 2012. Matter of fact, I believe they stumped arduously for Mitt going into the general election.
Y'all help me here: aside from the color of their coifs, please thrill me with what's the big difference between the twain other than Trump's way more aggressive against Islam, for more stringent border security and way more anti-Obama/Hillary than Mitt ever was. Also, I’m pretty certain said person also tried to sell us on McCain and they were very pro-George W. Bush. Go figure. Anyway …
The disturbing thing to moi was the rage combined with the unwavering conviction that they were right on every issue and, if you disagree with them, I guarantee they'd spew more f-bombs in your face than Gary Oldman would if he ran out of espresso and cigarettes.
This made me reminisce back to a group that existed a few years ago who "knew" they were "right" on every issue.
This group was extremely conservative, pro-life, and pro-Ten Commandments. Regarding their religious practices …holy moly…they were extremely devout. So devout that they make me look like a lush with my penchant for my amazing cigar line, dirty martinis and warrior movies.
This crew tithed a tenth of every thing they made, fasted once week out of every month, and memorized the Bible. Indeed, these people hated evil and had a zero tolerance policy for any religious or political leader who showed one scintilla of compromise with their “worldviewâ€. They were right, dammit. And God help you if you every drew their ire.
One man, who was also earnest and pretty conservative, but approached things way differently than they did, decided to take them on, and not only did they verbally blast him but they ended up killing him. The man they killed was named Jesus and the conservative group that had him offed was the first-century Pharisees. Yep, JC could not live up to their standards as a leader.
Speaking of standards for leaders, I wonder if those conservatives who're currently crapping on Trump, who’re looking for the perfect leader, would back the following leaders that God did? Check it out…
-- King David shagged Bathsheba (another man's wife) and then had her husband offed. Would conservatives vote for him?
-- What about Moses? Moses killed a man, married a black woman, and had massive anger issues. Can you say "deal breaker" for most conservatives?
-- What if Samson were on the ticket? Samson dated a hooker, killed Cecil The Lion, and had long hair. Can you imagine the melee that would ensue should some candidate have this Nazarite's track record? OMG. Scandal aplenty for the fastidious among us. But…he was God's choice and his Judge to lead an ancient Israel for a time.
-- What about Abraham? This old patriarch constantly lied about being married to his wife. Not. Very. Presidential.
Then you have Jesus' fab twelve whom he chose to change the planet that were an amalgam of rough-cussing fishermen who resembled the crew of Deadliest Catch. And don't even get me started on John The Baptist, who ate bugs and wore a camel skin.
And the list could go on and on regarding the massive and weird incongruities of eccentric men who were utilized to shake and shape nations for righteous purposes.
Bottom line: good luck finding Mr., Ms., Miss or Mrs. Perfect when voting for president. And by your standards you might as well start practicing saying President Hillary Rodham Clinton.
One more thing: I will vote for either Trump or Cruz depending upon who gets the nod. Also, and pardon my redundancy, but don't forget the wizards at the National Review told us Romney & Ryan were groovy. How'd that work out for them?
It was not only NR that said Romney was groovy it was the God-Emperor himself
http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/02/politics/campaign-wrap/index.html
Trump’s conservative critics are aware of his ideology (apparently, more than a lot of his supporters are) and find it wanting. We need someone more committed to limited government and constitutional procedures.
Y’all help me here: aside from the color of their coifs, please thrill me with what’s the big difference between the twain other than Trump’s way more aggressive against Islam, for more stringent border security and way more anti-Obama/Hillary than Mitt ever was
***************************************************
That is the BIG difference. The RNC/GOP is owned by The Cheap Labor Express and they have paid for another amnesty candidate and expect the RNC to deliver.
The vociferous opposition from the supposed “right” is just the paid flacks of The Cheap Labor Express delivering on their obligation to their employer to convince Americans that they can’t keep their country.
Praise HIM!
Wonder how many signon FR names this clown bought and uses to post the same bs on FR.
How very liberal that anyone who disagrees is a HATER.
Siaynoq!
That was yesterday. We new school now.
You left out the obvious leader chosen by G-d which compares to the DJT: King Solomon the Greedy. An over-site no doubt brought on by raving fits of passion over the unending limitless internecine word-processing battles between the Trumpeters and the Cruisers.
I don't hate Trump. I just don't trust him. Just because I agree with most of his words over the past six months doesn't erase his actions over the past 60 years.
Trump’s love for America, his goal of making America great again, is BY ITSELF more conservative than all the words penned by NR in their “take down Trump” issue the other day.
That just proves that you don’t understand what conservatism is.
It’s not based on “hate.” Labeling opposition to Trump as “hate” is a juvenile response. Many of us have reviewed his background and seen far too much in the way of shifting positions on key issues. It don’t trust him.. that’s all.
He definitely would have been better than that arrogant pos that currently occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Great article, thank you.
The author, Doug Giles, on his best day writes like a twelve year old trying to impress his buds with his snarkiness. Now he’s trying to impress the trumpsters and they are eating it up.
It = I
I think it’s the other way around. And seriously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.