Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

Everyone knows DT is stirring it up trying to keep Cruz from winning Iowa. DT makes Huck look an amateur. Of course he is a NY liberal so the art of Alinsky comes naturally for him.


3 posted on 01/20/2016 8:06:52 PM PST by libbylu (Trump's supporters have the same brain disease as Hillary's supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: libbylu

This was brought up by Fox news in 2014 and others have mentioned it too. You can be damn sure the dems would raise the issue if Cruz is the nominee. NBC is not settled or defined. This is just another article by an armchair judge.


12 posted on 01/20/2016 8:15:21 PM PST by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: libbylu

If Trump wins Iowa, the primary is over. Trump will get 50 states.


14 posted on 01/20/2016 8:16:02 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: libbylu

Cruz is gone. Try to accept it. It is over.


15 posted on 01/20/2016 8:17:41 PM PST by WENDLE (Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: libbylu
You make yourself look the "idiot" and don't know nor understand this topic.

And I see that all of you RABID Cruz supporters are now posting the same specious, slanderous tripe.

23 posted on 01/20/2016 8:28:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: libbylu

This is actually a political competition, I heard. Have you heard that? They say that typically, one candidate will vet the other. Have you heard that one?

Better now than never to discuss the fact that constitutional scholars, for decades, have declared this natural born citizenship business as an open question.

It hinges on the differences between those who believe the Constitution is a “living document” and those who believe it is only as written, or the original meaning at the time.

These two clash and have for some time.

“Natural” born had less to do with the birth right of the mother, as it did to “ties to the land”, as in “nature”.

This is the premise used by the contenders against the willy nilly bestowing of “natural born” title onto those born who were nowhere near the land, or shores, of the country, who had no literal ties to the land. Naturalization was the option for these birth babies, but not “natural” born status.


28 posted on 01/20/2016 8:37:23 PM PST by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: libbylu

Yes Trump is keeping this in the news but here’s my question. If Ted argued before the Supreme Court, if he’s the smartest guy in the room, why is everyone else talking about this but him. He could dominate the conversation with established law and precedent but he’s stayed relatively quiet.

Could just be advisors telling him not to humor Trump but its something I wonder about.


29 posted on 01/20/2016 8:37:49 PM PST by Kenny (RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson