Posted on 01/20/2016 7:30:22 PM PST by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Bernie Sanders, he leads Hillary Clinton 60 to 33% in New Hampshire in a WMUR poll, and the New York Times has a story on how a bunch of young feminists (exactly what we predicted on this program) are beginning to abandon Hillary as they learn about the "bimbo eruptions" and all of that. The New York Times has the story... The picture is with Lena Dunham, you know, supposedly the icon of modern-era feminism. (sigh) Another reason, folks, I'm glad I am older and am the age I am. If that's the... count me out. Nowhere near that. No way.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
Also on the Hillary Clinton side, in addition to the WMUR poll in New Hampshire, and that's an important poll. That is not an outlier poll. It's a mainstream New Hampshire poll. Bernie Sanders has soared to a commanding lead over Hillary in New Hampshire three weeks before the primary. Sanders leads Clinton 60 to 33%. This is a WMUR/CNN poll. He is viewed favorable by 91% of likely Democrat primary voters, unfavorably by 7%.
And then there is news about the Hillary Clinton e-mail server. Now we know why there are 150 FBI agents tracking her down. It turns out that she shared -- this e-mail server that she had outside the office, the one she had at home in the basement at Chappaqua or whatever, all of the classified documents, it turns out that that server and its contents were shared with the Clinton family crime foundation as well, meaning Bill Clinton had access to the e-mails, or could have had access to the e-mails on Hillary Clinton's server.
Hillary shared an e-mail network with the Clinton Foundation. According to records she "shared an IP address with her husband Bill Clinton's email server, presidentclinton.com, and both servers were housed in New York City, not in the basement of the Clintons' Chappaqua, New York home." Correct myself on that. Which means that whatever was on Hillary's server Bill had access to, and they're out there jointly seeking hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars in donations from agents, representatives, foreign governments all over the world. And it has now been speculated that because of the nature of the highly classified nature of the documents on her server, that they go beyond top secret.
Dr. Krauthammer on Fox, for example, last night said this goes beyond what Snowden did. This is worse than Snowden. And, by the way, people are now bringing Petraeus into this. Petraeus, they're thinking about stripping his rank from him. They're thinking about just totally ditching him. If that happens, he loses everything. He loses his pension. He loses every financial benefit that he accrued while in the military, not to mention his reputation as one of America's greatest generals.
And Petraeus did the identical thing that Hillary did and maybe even not as bad. He shared whatever secure information, classified data he had with the author that was doing the book on him that turned out to be his mistress, Paula Broadwell. Given that, given how this Regime -- it's now up to the secretary of defense what happens to Petraeus. Now, you stop and think of this.
Here's Petraeus, author of the surge in Iraq, saves the day. Obama hires him to run the Afghanistan portion, makes him CIA director or whatever, and now they're set to destroy him. There's no doubt some political component here obviously, but they're set to destroy Petraeus. One of the most decorated, highly decorated, highest reputed military men of the last two centuries. And he's on the verge of being destroyed. Pensions, 401(k)s, everything he's built up will be totally taken away because it's all with the government. This would be part of the punishment.
So people are starting to say, "Well, if you're gonna do this to Petraeus, and Mrs. Clinton's done identical things, pretty close to identical, if not worse, then how can you let her slide?" And there are other things involving the Hillary, Bernie Sanders campaign. As I mentioned, New York Times with a story on how Millennial-aged feminists led by that icon Lena Dunham are now beginning to have doubts about Mrs. Clinton 'cause they're not hip with all this bimbo eruption stuff. They really are just now learning about it.
They're not cool with the fact that when these bimbos popped up that it was Hillary's responsibility, and she eagerly accepted it, to destroy the women. When these women are out making up stories about having been raped on campus to make a point about how rotten men are, here's Hillary Clinton, they are discovering she took the women out to protect her husband, who was a predator. And this is in the New York Times, folks. And it's a pretty straight-up story.
END TRANSCRIPT
Please, please don't quit on Hillary Lena...
It does indeed appear that Hellary has lost the NYT. It’s all over but the shoutin’ for her. (plus ash tray throwing etc.)
Stunning that the Lena Dunham generation knew so little about Hillary’s bimbo machine from yesteryear and of the political-contract marriage.
I can’t fathom the minds of young liberals, but it doesn’t surprise me that Sanders is doing as well as he is.
Compared with Hillary, he has a much more authentic persona; for what he is, he comes across as genuine. I have never believed that Hillary, as old and tired and stilted as she is, could really gain the support of young people of any stripe.
I live near a University campus, and have seen many Bernie bumperstickers/signs; not much for Hillary at all.
-JT
Those are pretty amazing stats. And pretty scary too. Donald Trump has been getting most of the coverage so it is easy to forget that there is a political movement just as momentous on the Democrat side too.
My college student son was down to see us for the holidays and he reports that his entire campus is pretty much for Bernie. He doesn't know a single person who is for Shrillary. I know that is anecdotal but it ties into the 91% favorability rating (by Democrats) that we are seeing in this poll.
I would have to say that if Bernie Sanders is truly 91% favorable and 7% unfavorable in NH among Democrats, he could be unstoppable coming out of the primary there. Back in 2008, I cheered on Obama as he beat out Shrillary for the nomination as I thought he'd be easy for the Republicans to beat. I now regret that. But I detest Shrillary so much that I find myself cheering on Bernie to crush her all the same. Of course, I'm counting on the fact that we will easily beat Bernie in the general.
They're starting to 'get it' out there in the world...
I’m starting to see Bernie stickers/lawn signs and none yet for Hillary.
When Clinton trounces Sanders, and she will, there’s no way she chooses him as VP. What will these voters do? They’re not exactly the “get behind the candidate no matter what” types.
“They’re not cool with the fact that when these bimbos popped up that it was Hillary’s responsibility, and she eagerly accepted it, to destroy the women. “
This is the key. What Bill did, he did. He’s not running, How SHE acted is what matters and from all accounts she acted like a cold blooded fixer, Destroying, paying off and otherwise ridding the Clinton family of these women was her job and once the dam breaks, you’re going to hear story after story after story after story about this.
Hopefully that starts after she accepts the nomination.
Yep! She traded the lives of those injured women for her political career. So much for being on the side of women. Then, she defends PP who could care less about women or their health, they’re into the money!
Delicious irony! Bill Clinton’s predations showing up like Banquos Ghost to haunt Hillary’s campaign!
bump to the top
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.