Nope, CIA, we do not believe you.
Sorry, but the FBI is the ONLY remaining government agency with any believability right now.
And even that hangs on the balance depending on whether they charge the Hillawench with any of the hundreds of felonies she has committed.
“Sorry, but the FBI is the ONLY remaining government agency with any believability right now.”
Really? I gave up on the FBI after Waco.
Seriously? Richard Jewell and Steven Hatfill immediately come to mind. The FBI's absolute refusal to investigate anything Clinton related is another reason I think the FBI is nothing more than an elected official's attack dog..
Kurt Mix, a BP engineer called in AFTER the Deep Horizon spill to "fix it", was prosecuted by 0Muslim's "Jesters" Department because he deleted TWO text messages from his cell phone.
But the Gruberment can't seem to find ANYTHING to charge Hillary The Liar with...
Ex-BP engineer says he was 'scapegoat'
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2015/11/08/ex-bp-engineer-says-he-was-scapegoat/
He [Kurt Mix] says his one "egregious error" was believing the Justice Department wanted the truth.
Do a Google or Bing search on "I Was an Oil Spill Scapegoat" and you can get the whole WSJ article without having to deal with the paywall.
If the Fibbies don't charge Hillary Clinton, the entire body of federal law is null and void, as far as I'm concerned. Oh, yes, they can sic their gunthugs on us lowly peasants, but that's all they'll be - gunthugs.
>>Sorry, but the FBI is the ONLY remaining government agency with any believability right now.<<
Get ready to be disappointed again. FBI is very corrupt. See account of Sibel Edmonds, FBI Whistle-blower.
If “...the FBI is the ONLY remaining government agency with any believability right now...”
what happened to the evidence of felonies committed and evidence they gathered during the Clinton impeachment in the 1990s? That was supposedly “outside the scope” of the Clinton impeachment and therefore NOT permitted to be pursued during impeachment? The WSJ article:
Wall Street Journal 12/14/98 “.What will be the next shoe to fall? Judiciary Counsel David Schippers warned that “we uncovered more incidents involving probably direct and deliberate obstruction of justice, witness tampering, perjury and abuse of power,” but desisted in raising these incidents because the Justice Department and Independent Counsel said investigations were nearing completion. Democrats cried foul, but the history of the President personally and his Administration generally gives every reason to expect a lot more secrets remain to be exposed. Across town from the Judiciary Committee as it took its historic vote last week, for example, a federal judge was dealing with the Administration’s handling of some 900 FBI files, an incident on which the President has supposedly been “exonerated.” When Ken Starr said last month he wouldn’t send a Filegate impeachment referral to Congress, it merely indicated he had found no evidence that President Clinton himself had been involved in the handling of the files. He didn’t say the case was closed...There is also the campaign-finance shoe. We have before us a magazine called China Today, a Communist organ out of Beijing. And on the August cover of China Today is a new national hero, Ng Lap Seng. He’s the famous figure from the campaign finance hearings who was sometimes known as Mr. Wu. Mr. Ng, recall, was the shadowy Macau moneyman who funneled more than $900,000 through Charlie Trie to the Clinton re-election effort. Our Micah Morrison reported in February on Mr. Ng’s ties to both Asian organized crime and the People’s Liberation Army in Macau. The China Today cover story highlights Mr. Ng’s services for the home team. No mention of the Clinton scandals, of course, but we do learn that Mr. Ng has received another in a series of Chinese government plums, appointment to the Preparatory Committee for the Macau Special Administrative Region — the group that will carve up the Portugal-administered enclave as it is handed over to the Communists in December 1999. Indeed, the skies keep opening up even as the impeachment hearings proceed. Last week, Rep. Lindsey Graham revealed how in the days after Mr. Clinton suggested to a credulous Sidney Blumenthal that Monica Lewinsky was “stalking” the President, allies such as Rep. Charlie Rangel began suggesting that “the poor child” had “emotional problems” and was “fantasizing.” This would have been Miss Lewinsky’s reputation today, thanks to the President’s efforts, had she not saved the semen-stained dress, thanks to advice from Ms. Tripp...”
Your line about the FBI having believability is the funniest read I’ve had in 20 years. Have you ever heard of Waco, Ruby Ridge, Olympic bomber, Wm. Clinton?