The similarities in style of fictitious narrative are striking.
The Naturalization Act of 1790 legislated during the Second Session of the First Congress. The following portion of the Act discussed natural born citizen as follows:
And the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, That person heretofore proscribed by any State, shall be admitted as a citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.[ii]
Are not the words you showed me? The Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed because the First Congress did not have the authority to change the original meaning of “natural born citizen” set by the Framers of the Constitution. If you read the Naturalization Act of 1795, the words “natural born citizen” are not used. That is because that term was specifically used for the chief office (and Vice President) of the land. Go to the Naturalization Act of 1795 and see if I am correct.
By the way, I have always loved Senator Cruz. He is my modern version of Abraham Lincoln because of his grasp of the conservative fundamentals that should be governing this nation. I only do this examination of “natural born citizen” as an effort to educate those to what I see as the truth. I would hate to see Senator Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz be going from the campaign rallies to the lawsuit court contesting his eligibility; when he has to win an election, if nominated. I would be devastated if that happened; especially if der Hildebeast drops out because of an indictment.
Go here for a good explanation of my case: