Posted on 01/13/2016 1:09:43 PM PST by Morgana
Speaker Paul Ryan invited the Little Sisters of the Poor to join him as his guests for the State of the Union. But that’s not the only way in which they’re getting a helping hand from Congress.
The office of Rep. Diane Black (R-TN) issued a press release with a link to a bipartisan amicus brief signed by 207 members of Congress in support of the Little Sisters of the Poor. The amicus brief was sent to the Supreme Court in support of the Catholic group and other non-profit organizations in the upcoming case of Zubik vs. Burwell.
Such groups in the case object to signing a form which they argue makes them compliant in violating their faith when it comes to providing contraception and abortifacient drugs.
Black, as well as Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) who also signed on and announced the amicus brief, stressed religious liberty was at stake in the case.
From Rep. Black’s press release:
It is hard to imagine what could possibly be more pure or worthwhile than the ministry of Little Sisters of the Poor and the other religious nonprofits represented in this case. We should be praising their work, not punishing it. Sadly, that is exactly what Obamacare’s coercive HHS mandate will do. The law sets up an impossible choice for these organizations: deny their deeply held beliefs and provide coverage for drugs they deem to be morally objectionable, or face crippling financial penalties from the federal government. This is a pivotal moment for religious freedom and I am honored to lend my voice and my prayers to the growing chorus calling on the Supreme Court to rectify this crisis and protect these time-honored rights from government attack when this case is heard later this year.
Rep. Mike Kelly stated:
The HHS mandate remains a hideous component of a disastrous law that puts government’s power over people’s rights. It puts this administration on the wrong side of our nation’s long and cherished history of religious liberty and tolerance—and deserves to be defeated. With this amicus brief, my colleagues and I stand side by side with the Little Sisters of the Poor and all those whose First Amendment rights have been trampled under this president’s agenda. I expect the Supreme Court to ultimately free these heroic nuns from the mandate’s oppressive penalties and allow them to continue serving a country where religious freedom is not just settled but celebrated. No government program or politician must ever be permitted to punish American citizens for peacefully following their faith—period.
From Sen. Lankford:
This bipartisan amicus brief articulates the great concern that many Americans have about our First Amendment right of the free exercise of religion. The case exposes the Obama administration’s focus on freedom of worship as our primary religious right, instead of our freedom of religion, which includes our everyday lives. Colleges, universities and nonprofits should never be placed in a position where they have to violate their faith to please the government. The question before the Supreme Court should never have reached this level, but it is important for the future of our liberty that the Court now rule in favor of religious freedom.
Senator Orrin Hatch noted that “religious freedom is a fundamental right that government must respect and accommodate.â€
With any hope, the Supreme Court will agree with these members of Congress and the over 200 more. It is not merely religious liberty which is at stake here, but religious liberty to protect life from the moment it begins at conception.
Roberts will find a way to screw ‘em.
Yes, he will.
South American Scottish twins and a possible gay background.
There’s always that castle in Malta.
Thank you, Pres. Bush (I guess.)
Good! The damned congress is so complicit in obama’s subversion of America otherwise. This mess would not continue if congress would only defund Obamacare now, and then repeal it when / if we get an American president again
The were to sent to congress to make an exemption for anyone . They were sent there to DEFUND and KILL it so no American is stuck with this.
This is complete BS
Did the camera show them last night? Were they in their habits??
Patriots please note that the amiscus amounts to a ”wet noodle” reprimand to Obama imo, a dog-and-pony election year stunt in other words.
Noting that this issue concerning the Little Sisters of the Poor is one of many reasons that Obama should not be in the Oval Office, consider the following critique of this issue borrowed from another thread.
- - - - - - -
"President Barack Obama is disrespecting the deeply-held religious views of the Little Sisters of the Poor by forcing them to pay for abortion-causing drugs under the HHS mandate."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
The problem with the first sentence in the OP is this imo. The Oval Office does not have the legislative power to make private citizens do anything.
More specifically, noting that Congress has the constitutional authority to stop lawless Obama dead in his tracks with respect to what Obama is effectively doing to the nuns, what is going on with Congress and Obama is the following imo.
Corrupt lawmakers are evidently more interested in protecting their voting records than helping the nuns. So they are letting lawless Obama steal legislative branch powers to do their dirty, unconstitutional legislative work for them regardless of the consequences for the nuns. By doing this they will be able to keep their voting records clean to help fool low-information citizens into reelecting them this year.
And what is even worse than letting Obama get away with exercising legislative branch powers is this. The states have never delegated to Congress, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate INTRAstate healthcare. So Congress is letting Obama get away with exercising powers that Congress does not even have.
What a mess ! :^(
So if patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they will also need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the president.
In fact, note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices who likewise help to empower bad-apple presidents to do unconstitutional things.
290 would be veto proof.
Boy, if there were ONLY a way for Congress to tell the Court what is can/not even look in the general vicinity of.
Yep, damn shame
Paul Ryan leads Congress in effort to aid Little Sisters of the Poor (who are suing Obama over the Obamacare mandate that they provide maternity and abortion coverage) in protest against Obamacare mandates. Case is before US Supreme Court. 207 members of Congress file amicus brief.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off this Wisconsin interest ping list.
ESAD, PP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.