Hillary Calls for Free Abortions for Medicaid Recipients

The Weekly Standard ^ | Jan 11, 2016 | John McCormack

[Shadow44]

I feel like abortion is the only issue they ever talk about.

Democrats: Party of Abortion.

[EQAndyBuzz]

“Kill the poor, and then sell their body parts.”

This should be the Republicans “Throw Grandma off the cliff” ad.

I think it will play well.

[blueunicorn6]

If you get something for free, it’s because someone else worked to pay for it.

[SampleMan]

If its not a baby, why not make them mandatory abortions?

I’d like to hear a Leftist answer that.

[MagnoliaB]

Margaret Sanger would be so proud.

[MNJohnnie]

Hillary is just continuing the work of her idol

I admire Margaret Sanger enormously,” Secretary Clinton had said in March, “her courage, her tenacity, her vision . . . And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.”

Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

[patq]

Hillary’s proposals seem to involve a lot of taxing and a lot of spending. That has worked out well for us so far. /s

[Buckeye McFrog]

I want mine. Retroactively.

Me too. The mother's name is Ann Dunham.

[loveliberty2]

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. The hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."- Thomas Jefferson, Author of Declaration of Independence

"Progressives" must, in effect, deny the Creator of all life in order to rationalize that likewise created human beings possess a right to "destroy" that which they, themselves, were privileged to possess, solely because they passed through the mother's birth canal unharmed by the hand of another.

"All honor to Jefferson--to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.- Abraham Lincoln, Letter to Messrs Henry L. Pierce & others. Source: Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, edited by Roy P. Basler.

Source for this reproduction of the letter here.

At the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington DC on February 3, 1994, Mother Teresa stated: “And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"

So-called "progressive" politicians, in order to advance an agenda opposing Second Amendment rights, in what might appear to be faux grief over murdered adults and children resulting from the use of other instruments, might consider Mother Teresa's words.

As a result, so-called "progressives" have led America away from the very premise of its very founding documents. Such a movement, in the context of the history of civilizations, is, in fact, regressive, and now openly supports industries facilitating the "destroying" of life and liberty of those who have not emerged into the light and liberty which birth allows.

All of the faux tears and the torrent of words decrying the "deaths of children" by guns are meaningless when one reads Hillary's commitment to a federal government policy such as the one she advocates.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Why didn't Hillary get an abortion when she became impregnated by Webster Hubbell?

[loveliberty2]

Here's another shocking "concept" one might pursue.

Consider a bit of genealogical research wherein the genealogist finds that a few generations back in his/her family, he/she discovers a female who has two children out of wedlock, one of whom is an ancestor of the researcher who marries, has 7 children by a fist wife who dies. He remarries, and then has 9 children by the second wife. Each of these 16 children has multiple children and grandchildren, one of whom is the genealogist's own great-grandfather.

In such a scenario, one can see that there will result from those two pregnancies literally thousands of descendants of that original great-great grandmother will live because she did not have abortions after she conceived either of those two children.

In the "progressive" society, that young woman might have been encouraged to deprive all those citizens of their Creator-endowed rights. That is why belief a Creator Source is critical.

These facts confirm that when an abortion occurs, there is not just one life of potential accomplishment and purpose aborted, but there may be generations and generations completely erased from future censuses.

[Migraine]

Good one. The snuffing of an individual is so terminal (in terms of what might have been).
Abortion has ramifications. That is true in many guises. The word, “ramify”, itself, contains an arboreal metaphor that is totally appropriate for the family-tree implications that you so ably suggest.

[cgbg]

“Hillary calls for taxpayer funded Eugenics”—that is the truth and the headline you will never see or hear on the MSM.

[NEMDF]

Don’t they already get free birth control?

[goodwithagun]

Good God! It’s like the Oprah show became a horror story: “You get a free abortion! And you get a free abortion! Everybody in the audience today gets a free abortion!”

[MaggiesPitchfork]

If anything, Medicaid recipients should be more responsible and keep their pants on. Penalize them for getting preggers, and you’ll see them stop their destructive behavior. “Oh, we can’t stop them from having irresponsible sex!” Sure you can, dipsh!ts.

[MayflowerMadam]

I guess Hillary never knew of a baby who didn’t need killin’.

[MeshugeMikey]

DNA tests for everybody On The House!!

[boatbums]

I believe we need to protect access to safe and legal abortion, not just in principle, but in practice. Any right that requires you to take extraordinary measures to access it is no right at all," Clinton said. "Not as long as we have laws on the book like the Hyde amendment, making it harder for low income women to exercise their full rights,"

The Hyde amendment does nothing to hinder a woman's ability to exercise her right to kill her unborn child. What it tries to do is keep ME from having to pay for it. Low income women can make the same decisions as all women do in whether or not they engage in unprotected sexual intercourse. They aren't feral dogs or cats that need to be spayed to keep them from procreating because all the feral males jump them when they're in heat!

Ginsberg, like Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) before her also wanted to limit the "undesirables" of society. It's a covert form of genocide and they will never admit it.

[presidio9]

"America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has shown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts ~ a child ~ as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters. And in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." -Mother Teresa