He's constantly testing the political market for voters, throwing ideas against the wall, seeing what sticks. If he gets a positive response he says it again. If not, he drops it.Yes. Trump's a man of true core convictions.
Sounds like a typical Republican to me.
I'm not voting for Jebito, or any of the others polling at 3%.
If it's not Cruz, or Trump, I'm staying home for the first time in over 40 yrs.
5.56mm
So this is, like, what, the 5th or 6th raving article from “Conservative Review,” the place that has a Ted Cruz speech writer on the payroll with the hysterical Mark Levin as editor?
No thanks.
So now that Trump is back ahead in Iowa, and not faltering everywhere else, now we get 2 weeks of every no-name conservative blog making appeals to conformity.
More TDS. I wonder how many will commit hara-kiri if Cruz loses Iowa.
I don’t see ‘some support’ and ‘few’ at any Trump event....I see MASSIVE support and YUGE turnouts....
“Fellow travelers.” What an odd term to use in this context.
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
YOUR POST HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ONE IN WHICH “THE DON” HAS BEEN MALIGNED.
CONTINUED ATTEMPTS TO MALIGN “THE DON” WILL RESULT IN SOCIAL EXCORIATION AS WELL AS THE QUESTIONING OF YOUR CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES!
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
The Overton window, also known as the window of discourse, is the range of ideas the public will accept. It is used by media pundits.[1][2] The term is derived from its originator, Joseph P. Overton (1960–2003),[3] a former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy,[4] who in his description of his window claimed that an idea's political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within the window, rather than on politicians' individual preferences.[5] According to Overton's description, his window includes a range of policies considered politically acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, which a politician can recommend without being considered too extreme to gain or keep public office.
Rather then posting their usual collection of daily bile laced infantile personal attack tirades at Trump and his supporters, perhaps "Conservatories and Libertarians", might want to thank Trump for changing the national political paradigm so far in their direction that a "President Cruz" is now a distinct possibility.
Well if Matt Kibbe says so.
By the way, who is Matt Kibbe?
I cannot speak on behalf of patriots, but I think that the gist is that Trump is the monkey wrench that patriots want to throw into the corrupt Washington cartel.
This democratization of politics is fueled by no one else but Donald Trump social media, the breakup of the big media cartel, and the ability of insurgent candidates to raise money and organize boots on the ground without permission from party headquarters or lobbyist money bundlers. Political disintermediation is a very good thing because it breaks up concentrated power.
And whoever you are, you’re not even the question.
Pardon my French but leave me the hell alone and STFU.
He may not be your preferred answer Kibbe, but he’s the answer you are getting after betrayal upon betrayal.
Denial is irrelevant.
I bet something that would drive liberals bonkers is:
“All we are saying...is give Trump a chance!”
However, I feel I'm watching a wave I cannot stop. If Trump wins the nomination, and it looks like he will for now, I believe he will be elected. We hear and see some of his antics but your talking about an electorate that elected BHO despite ties to Ayres, Wright, “first time I've been proud of my country” ect. And you have a scared and angry electorate, rightly so, looking for someone who speaks their language. Trump does that, for now. The Trump phenomenom is a result of what people like BHO, Hillary, McConnell, Ryan, ect. ect. have created. Them, along with CNN, NYT, ABC News..
If he wins, I hope he proves me wrong about him. But I had the same ill feeling watching my fellow Americans fall for “Hope and Change.”