Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yep. Kim Davis is coming to the SoTU
Hotair ^ | 01/12/2016 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 01/12/2016 10:31:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind

The First Lady will be featuring an empty chair as one of her guests for the State of the Union speech tonight. (It’s really rather crass to be stealing ideas from Clint Eastwood, isn’t it, Madam?) The empty chair will be joined by Syrian refugee Refaai Hamo, Paris train attack hero Staff Sgt. Spencer Stone, Ryan Reyes (whose boyfriend died at San Bernardino) and Satya Nadella.

But it’s not just Obama cheerleaders in the crowd. As the Hill reports, one guest will be from a decidedly different camp.

The Kentucky clerk briefly jailed last year for refusing to hand out marriage licenses to gay couples is slated to attend President Obama’s final State of the Union address, a source has confirmed to The Hill.

Kim Davis will attend Obama’s speech Tuesday night after the Family Research Council arranged for her to be in the House audience along with her attorney Mat Staver.

The Rowan County clerk will be in the audience along with Jim Obergefell, the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case legalizing gay marriage across the country, who will be a guest of President Obama.

Ms. Davis has certainly had a full dance card since she first vaulted to national attention. She’s already gotten to meet with the Pope and now she has the dubious honor of sitting through a Barack Obama speech in Washington. Of course, it’s fairly obvious what a dog and pony show this is for our nation’s politicians given that Jim Obergefell will be there as well. The pairing makes for a dream ticket in terms of the networks, though. Just think about it: every time the President says something about all of his many victories on the social justice front for gays the cameras can be ready to flash over to Davis grimacing and Obergefell fist pumping. If we’re really lucky they might even do a split screen. Oh, the drama!

It’s kind of a shame that things have gotten to the point where the guest list at these speeches is just a series of pieces of performance art to poke a finger in somebody’s eye rather than filling the seats with people who might just legitimately want to be there. Yes, I know… for the vast majority of the people we normally speak to here the obvious question is, why would you want to? But the Democrats certainly do. And I’m willing to bet that if there’s an upcoming State of the Union given by a President Cruz or Trump or Rubio there are a fair number of folks here who wouldn’t mind going. Trust me, I’ve been to my share of rubber chicken events in DC and at various stops along the campaign trail elsewhere. Sometimes it can be a chore, but it’s also an experience to have at least once, providing a chance to see (and yes.. be seen) with other folks in the game. Also, some of the after parties can be pretty good at times.’

In fact, in the end, it’s not really about the speech at all. If what you really cared about was hearing what the President had to say you could do so from the comfort of your own home on any of dozens of network and cable channels or on the radio in your car. It’s far more spectacle than substance. But the media owns the show now and the guest list is strictly serving the purpose of building a “highlight” reel from an even that will be drearily short of actual highlights.

KimDavis


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhosotu; gaymarriage; kimdavis; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2016 10:31:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure Zero will go out of his way to make her feel unwelcome. That’s just the kind of human being he is.


2 posted on 01/12/2016 10:33:46 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Article doesn’t say whether Kim will be the Obama’s chosen guest, or accompanying some other Congressman et al.


3 posted on 01/12/2016 10:35:36 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

i still dont get how she was a registered demonrat?

oh well.

i wonder what she thinks about abortion? being against both usually goes hand in hand.


4 posted on 01/12/2016 10:36:04 AM PST by dp0622 (i .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo tjH2vnB.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


5 posted on 01/12/2016 10:36:05 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What’s the over/under on # of USSC Justices appearing?


6 posted on 01/12/2016 10:40:50 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am not too surprised that the empty suit would have an empty chair.


7 posted on 01/12/2016 10:41:08 AM PST by Zarro (Ben Carson 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Article doesn’t say whether Kim will be the Obama’s chosen guest, or accompanying some other Congressman et al.
I would have thought she'd be sitting in Ted Cruz's "I stand with Kim Davis" seat.
8 posted on 01/12/2016 10:44:08 AM PST by lewislynn ( You know you're a Muslim if everything offends you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Article doesn’t say whether Kim will be the Obama’s chosen guest, or accompanying some other Congressman et al.
I would have thought she'd be sitting in Ted Cruz's "I stand with Kim Davis" seat.
9 posted on 01/12/2016 10:44:29 AM PST by lewislynn ( You know you're a Muslim if everything offends you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is so obscure, I had to look her up.


10 posted on 01/12/2016 10:45:06 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Meh. Never understood why she thought she could put her name on licenses for possible adulterers, divorcees, or those who engaged in premarital sex but not homosexuals...


11 posted on 01/12/2016 10:47:55 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kim Davis IS a Democrat.


12 posted on 01/12/2016 10:49:09 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hasn’t this woman suffered enough.... now she has to sit through obammy giving SOTU speech?


13 posted on 01/12/2016 10:50:56 AM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone; SeekAndFind
"Never understood why she thought she could put her name on licenses for possible adulterers, divorcees, or those who engaged in premarital sex but not homosexuals.."

One good reason why, is that legally (sorry to bring up tedious legalities, but legally) KY no longer has a marriage statute. That is, it is quite likely that nobody can be legally married in KY. This is because the USSC struck down their statute in Obergefell, but the legislature never replaced it with another statute. Therefore KY has no authority to issue a license to anybody.

Kim Davis brought this out early in her conflict, when she emphasized that she was sworn to carry out her duties as authorized by KY statutes, and the statutes now gave her no such authorization.

That language kinda got swamped by the later focus on her personal moral and religious objections, but n fact KY to this day does not have a legal definition of marriage.

14 posted on 01/12/2016 10:59:24 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Rowan County KY is strongly Democrat. Winning the (D) primary there is basically winning the election. Therefore she was registered (D).


15 posted on 01/12/2016 11:00:29 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I agreed with that stance - but she didn’t stick to it...


16 posted on 01/12/2016 11:00:44 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
Yes, and I have never understood why. Her lawyer from Liberty Counsel --- Matt Staver --- should have strongly pushed that angle, which could have resulted in a very fine test case which could have sparked more resistance from the states.

It could still be pushed if somebody had strategic sense the tssticular fortitude to stick with it.

17 posted on 01/12/2016 11:06:25 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You have to wonder how many other states still haven’t reconfigured their legal system to update the Supreme Court’s 5-4 redefinition of marriage and made the changes to forms, procedures, etc. to institute the changes.


18 posted on 01/12/2016 11:07:58 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think this is so ironic. Clint Eastwood featured Obama as an empty chair at the republican convention, and now Obama is inviting the chair to the SOTU!


19 posted on 01/12/2016 12:06:34 PM PST by anoldafvet (they're not immigrants, they're criminal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

Oh, exactly. My own state of TN is in that category as far as I know, and surely at least a dozen others. I could make a helluva states-based challenge if somebody wanted to pick it up and run with it.


20 posted on 01/12/2016 12:15:18 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson