Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silicon Valley should jump into the smart gun market
San Jose Mercury News ^ | 1/8/16 | Michelle Quinn

Posted on 01/08/2016 6:01:39 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom

...Ron Conway, the San Francisco angel investor, helped to pioneer the Smart Tech Challenges Foundation, which put up $1 million to fund a variety of ideas that advance gun lock technology. The goal had been to create the "iPhone of guns," Conway said...

...at least some of the more than 30,000 gun deaths each year would be avoided if there were smart guns. In theory, the technology would reduce gun suicides, gun deaths from accidents and deaths involving stolen guns. Smart guns might have particular appeal to law enforcement who have to worry about their weapons being used against them in tense situations.

Conway's foundation gave money to 15 entrepreneurs working on smart gun technology, including "smart ammunition." The highest amounts went to those closest to bringing the product to market. Some of the projects focus on firearms that can be fired only when they receive a radio signal from someone with a watch or ring. Other guns unlock when they identify the owner's fingerprint or grip. The foundation has given grants to entrepreneurs working on mechanical locks to better secure guns.

...why shouldn't Silicon Valley get involved? We live in a world where technology has personalized many products -- our phone, our cars, even our smoke detectors. If tech can make a gun safer -- yes, it sounds like an oxymoron -- and make some money, venture capitalists should create smart gun funds much like they do with funds focused on specific sectors such as clean tech. Companies already working on RFID, biometrics and global positioning systems (for finding lost or stolen guns) should jump in as well. The personalized gun is not a panacea that will end gun deaths. But it would be a better gun if it works only in the owner's hands.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; gun; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To the author's credit, she did include this sentence: "Not surprisingly, gun advocates haven't embraced the efforts of Smart Tech and others. Smart guns are a slippery slope leading to gun control, some feel. Gun enthusiasts have raised questions about the reliability of the guns -- what if there was a technological glitch when you needed to defend yourself? "

But overall, she puts her faith in Silicon Valley entrepreneurs to come up with safe guns.

1 posted on 01/08/2016 6:01:39 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Why? I won’t buy one.


2 posted on 01/08/2016 6:02:41 PM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

It’s certainly the latest opening to defraud the taxpayers if Ubama’s EO goes anywhere. The solar panel fraud has run its course.


3 posted on 01/08/2016 6:05:35 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Considering that Microsoft can’t get Windows right (full of security holes), can’t imagine them getting into the smart gun software business.


4 posted on 01/08/2016 6:06:11 PM PST by doc1019 (Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

Of course not. Most people won’t. Just alerting everybody to a new push to get Silicon Valley to fix a non-problem. Use the info as you see fit.


5 posted on 01/08/2016 6:06:23 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Exactly right. They flushed billions on solar and car batteries. Now they can flush another billion on this. Democrat cronies lining up at the trough as we breathe.


6 posted on 01/08/2016 6:07:55 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
A bad idea, easily hacked.

Firearms are a 750+ year old technology that somebody hopes to control by adding a microchip?

Not gonna happen.

In Brazil, where guns are heavily controlled, people make their own machine guns.
7 posted on 01/08/2016 6:08:00 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

they really should not. libtards cant wait to encourage more companies to be part of the liability pools and be controlled under government regulations they currently are not under. damn fascists.


8 posted on 01/08/2016 6:08:51 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

No one is going to buy it


9 posted on 01/08/2016 6:08:58 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
San Jose Mercury News

Liberal rag

10 posted on 01/08/2016 6:10:07 PM PST by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“any attempt to shoot a senior ____ employee results in shutdown”.

Bah, this a gibmedat subsidy screed.


11 posted on 01/08/2016 6:10:50 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

A “safe” gun is one that absolutely reliably goes “BANG” when the legitimate owner needs it to. False negatives are intolerable.


12 posted on 01/08/2016 6:12:41 PM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I couldn’t imagine a gun running Widows 10. I’ll stay with my old tech guns.


13 posted on 01/08/2016 6:13:29 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

There is no smart gun market.


14 posted on 01/08/2016 6:14:03 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Hi Tech crap is just that. Hi Tech crap. It will be a cold day in he!! before I’d buy one of these so called “smart” guns.


15 posted on 01/08/2016 6:16:57 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Impeach the bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

So how exactly would a “smart guy” prevent the two-thirds of the so called “gun violence deaths” which are suicides?


16 posted on 01/08/2016 6:19:41 PM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Silicon Valley Smart Gun alright

I'm sorry, Dave, I can't let you fire your weapon, that would be racist, Islamophobic, homophobic and misogynistic, you being a straight White Christian male and all.

17 posted on 01/08/2016 6:22:01 PM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
No one is going to buy it

No one???

Not so sure. Specifics are not available -- but -- it could appeal to lot of people, like those with a lot of kids.

IF you don't have to lock up your guns where they would be hard to get your hands on when needed -- it may protect you and your family MORE.

Also other issues like someone turning your own gun on you.

There may some appeal there.

If made mandatory, not for me either!!
18 posted on 01/08/2016 6:22:33 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Get used to these words “type emergency password”. Because you will see those words a lot. I have used high end fingerprint readers on PC’s and they suck. I have used the android fingerprint login and it sucks. They all suck and a smart gun would suck too. You will be dead way before you can log in.


19 posted on 01/08/2016 6:24:59 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

That’s right. Another slush fund for DemoRats. If any industry doesn’t need help with R&D it’s the firearms industry. There are hundreds of individuals working on something new at any given time in history much less the employees of manufacturers. Those firearms makers who have been enjoying historic gains in stock values during the worst economy in decades.


20 posted on 01/08/2016 6:25:56 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson