Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

“”Making assumptions is a good way to be disappointed.””

“Likewise ignoring facts.”

You outlined several POSSIBILITIES. Possibilities are not facts. Some of the possibilities were criminal offenses, some were not. Don’t count your chickens, etc.


101 posted on 01/08/2016 1:11:07 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Brooklyn Attitude
Your first post was the possibility that they used secure fax even though the talking points were unclassified. That's a possibility so I asked why she instructed them to strip the headers. Your answer was the possibility they stripped the subject which was classified. So I pointed out that they have no authority at all to strip subject lines (or anything else) from a classified document and call it unclassified.

Do you have any more possibilities to offer? Anything that doesn't involve breaking the law?

103 posted on 01/08/2016 2:08:05 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson