Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude
Your first post was the possibility that they used secure fax even though the talking points were unclassified. That's a possibility so I asked why she instructed them to strip the headers. Your answer was the possibility they stripped the subject which was classified. So I pointed out that they have no authority at all to strip subject lines (or anything else) from a classified document and call it unclassified.

Do you have any more possibilities to offer? Anything that doesn't involve breaking the law?

103 posted on 01/08/2016 2:08:05 PM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

“Your answer was the possibility they stripped the subject which was classified.”

Where did I say that?

Lets Recap. You asked “What would “w no identifying heading” mean?”
I replied “IDK, no subject line? It could mean something other than a classification label.”

The point was that we shouldn’t assume the document was classified. It might have only been politically embarrassing and they stripped that part out.


105 posted on 01/08/2016 2:39:16 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson