”. . . in hope of having the courts define the rights of aircraft operators versus property owners with respect to unmanned aerial vehicles.”
This constitutionally clueless drone owner is unthinkingly opening Pandoras Box imo.
More specifically, regardless that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate the use of drones, I would not be surprised if this drone owner finds an anti-state sovereignty activist federal judge who legislates new unconstitutional INTRAstate federal drone laws from the bench.
The FAA controls all the air above 500 feet...have for a long time.
That’s why I think someone put the drone owner up to the lawsuit. Prolly the federal AG.
Yes, somehow the feds will find a way to use the always abused Commerce Clause to justify new regs.