Posted on 01/05/2016 11:47:56 AM PST by Kaslin
Republican Presidential candidates will have an opportunity to show voters an alternative to the half-century War on Poverty at a policy forum January 9 that recalls a legendary public servant who empowered individuals over the welfare state. Jack Kemp, former Cabinet Secretary, Congressman and Buffalo Bills quarterback, left a void in conservatives' ability to connect with people on both an emotional and practical level about the plight of the homeless, the addicted and the unemployed.
Fortunately, the Jack Kemp Foundation, which is hosting the "expanding opportunity" forum in the key primary state of South Carolina, has preserved official correspondence and oral histories from former colleagues following his untimely death in 2009. Most Republican candidates are scheduled to participate and it would be in the self-interest of those currently leading in the polls if they did so as well. At stake is the potential for conservatives to go on offense about income inequality and raise awareness about the effectiveness of 50- plus years of auto-pilot "investments" in the annual $1 trillion welfare state. The playbook for a forceful anti-poverty agenda and urban renewal is Kemp's record.
As the Department of Housing and Urban Development secretary under President George H.W. Bush, Kemp took charge of a broken, scandal-ridden organization neglected under the Reagan years. Widely considered a backwater cabinet department, then as now, former colleagues recount how Kemp jump-started the bureaucracy.
The new goals of the department were clear, easy-to-understand and distributed to department employees on business cards. Focused on home ownership, reducing homelessness, ridding drugs from public housing and jobs and economic development in the inner cities, the mission of the department quickly became ingrained in the organization's culture. Contrast that with the present approach where addressing climate change and an ill-defined goal of "strengthening rural, tribal, suburban, and urban communities" pit HUD bureaucrats against an alphabet soup of other departments and agencies vying to advance politically-correct philosophy.
Unlike the Washington-centric approach today, Kemp routinely visited public housing projects in ghettos across America, promoting tenant ownership and enabling residents to seize control of property from notoriously corrupt local public housing authorities. Following the Los Angeles riots in 1992, sparked by a police confrontation with Rodney King, President Bush and Secretary Kemp visited the city, challenging conventional wisdom on urban renewal policies. President Obama and current Secretary Julian Castro, on the other hand, stayed away from Baltimore and Ferguson, Missouri, choosing instead to announce grants in subsequent months while the Department of Justice investigated local police departments.
But it was in Congress that Kemp's career embodied the free-market principles that enable people to escape poverty and government dependency. Kemp understood that tax and regulatory policy was smothering America's great cities, fostering concentrations of poverty. A champion of "empowerment zones," he sought to untangle the regulatory thicket and uncompetitive tax climate that cause businesses, jobs and residents to flee to the suburbs. Those that remain to riot and loot at night, like we saw in Baltimore and Ferguson, often have nowhere to be the next morning.
In a speech to a group of black Republicans in 1986 Kemp talked about the same class-warfare issues at the forefront of the last two Presidential campaigns and emerging yet again for 2016.
"We have learned better ways to mobilize the private sector, where wealth was created, rather than looking exclusively to government, where wealth is only redistributed," Kemp said.
St. Matthew's House in southwest Florida started in the late 1980's as a homeless shelter and soup kitchen and has grown into a $14 million social enterprise based on mobilizing the private sector, not government. About 75% of the 1500 people who pass through transitional housing and the drug-treatment program every year secure permanent employment. This was done through launching businesses, namely thrift stores and a catering operation, instead of becoming non-profit drones filling out paperwork for federal grants. The best thing government can do for organizations like ours is create the conditions for economic growth that go beyond the anemic annual 2% levels we have seen in recent years.
Jack Kemp reminds us there is more to combatting poverty than food stamps, public housing projects and cash assistance programs. The poverty rate is nearly 15% which, according to the U.S. Census has not budged in four years and represents only a few percentage points decline since 1965. The politics of income inequality ignores those facts. Campaigns that want victory over the class warfare crowd while expanding their demographic appeal in the general election will take up Kemp's legacy, and continue the second war on poverty he started.
Just what we need, to jump-start a Federal Bureaucracy that by the Constitution should be handled by the States.
End welfare. We’ll have less poverty when we stop paying people to be “poor.”
How many trillions have we wasted already trying to help people who should just get their acts together and help themselves? What we refer to as “poor people” in America are mainly a bunch of grifters with government-paid iPhones, free housing and a monthly stipend. Talk about taking that away and you’re a racist.
For you have the poor always with you; - Matthew 26:11
Yes, as Christians we should reach out to the poor. But it is not so much that there are poor, it is that we have created so many who are not only poor, but permanently dependent. And it is the characteristics of this dependency that are such pernicious evils. They include a breakdown of family structure, lack of incentive to improve their lives, the creation of a largely criminal class, and the production of nothing but an ever larger following generation of people just like themselves. I don’t have the answer of how to completely solve this problem, but the first step seems rather obvious.
Stop subsidizing it. Don’t reform welfare. End it; tear it up by the roots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.