Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

Federal law prohibits naming a staff of people.

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/29/600

Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.


11 posted on 12/20/2015 7:53:12 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

“favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate”

So agreeing with a candidate is a felony? This entire law is a hole big enough to fly a Saturn 5 through sideways.

Example

“John and I agree on X. The country would benefit from having a guy like Jon as our Y”.

“Bob and I agree on X. The country would benefit from having someone like Bob as our Y” instead of the garbage we have.”

Good luck trying to convict on that statement.


20 posted on 12/20/2015 8:14:37 AM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Thanks for taking the time to look that up, I was pretty sure that was the case.

Marko


21 posted on 12/20/2015 8:15:20 AM PST by markoman (If one gun is justified.....they all are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Then with all due respect, why is apparently no one concerned with Donald Trump, who if I am not mistaken, didn’t just float the idea of I believe it was Carl Ichan as Treasury Secretary or some such thing, but allegedly offered him the job if elected. If they are not going after Trump for that, they won’t go after Cruz for this.


32 posted on 12/20/2015 8:51:14 AM PST by American Faith Today
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Which the supposed “brilliant Constitution and LAW expert” apparently doesn’t know.


58 posted on 12/21/2015 1:47:23 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Its only illegal if the job offer is made as a reward for political support. In other words, Cruz is just fine to tell people that he thinks Sessions would make a great Homeland Security Secretary. What would be illegal is if he said to Sessions, endorse me and I will appoint you homeland security secretary. Basically this is prohibiting bribing with political jobs.


60 posted on 12/21/2015 1:55:29 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

The citation is bogus. For the law to apply a prosecutor would have prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there had been a quid pro quo of Cruz making a promise of the appointment to Sessions in return for his political support.


75 posted on 12/21/2015 3:16:27 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, kill them, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson