The Homosexual Rights Movement and Child Sexual Abuse

The issue of pedophilia is once again making its way into the mainstream. Researchers are now claiming that it is normal for men to feel a sexual attraction to young, pre-pubescent children. As the homosexual rights movement continues to gain ground, we hear more and more about the normalization of pedophilia in our culture. There is a definite agenda to normalize sexually deviant behavior while pushing for pedophile rights. Pedophiles are actively seeking to lower the age of consent laws when it comes to lawful sexual behavior with another. They claim that sex with children is not only a natural desire felt by adult males, but that, in many cases, the children affected may actually benefit from it as opposed to experiencing harm. Many sodomite rights activists also push the idea that child sexual abuse committed against young boys is not a homosexual problem, but one of heterosexual males, instead. This is a sick, twisted agenda being pushed under the guise of a human rights campaign backed up by fallacious research supporting the desires of sodomites. If not stopped, this could have dire consequences for the future of humanity.

It has long been understood that children who have suffered from child sexual abuse were likely to experience severe trauma from the event. Researchers have long concluded that feelings of sexual confusion, worthlessness, depression and suicidal thoughts were associated with sexual abuse. In many cases, even post-traumatic stress disorder has been thought to be a consequence. The rates for reported mental health issues, according to a report published in the Journal of Pediatric Health Care, is higher for people who self-report for child sexual abuse. The rates are higher for women, 56% as opposed to 47% for men. The rates for mental health issues among those with no history of child sexual abuse are significantly lower, 32% for women and 34% for men. This report also finds that boys will most likely experience a fifteen fold increase in suicidal tendencies as opposed to those who have not experienced sexual abuse, while girls have a threefold increase for suicidal behavior. This is generally after introducing treatments for depression and other symptoms. Based on these findings, and what has generally been known about child sexual abuse, children suffer greatly when abused by adults. This is the reason pedophilia has long been treated as a crime. Things are rapidly changing. Pedophilia is now considered more of a "sexual orientation" among many in the scientific community. The latest edition of the DSM, the DSM V, was going to classify pedophilia as a sexual orientation but revised its decision after receiving backlash from the public. This doesn't change the fact that there are still those seeking to normalize sex with children.

Lately, many academic papers have been surfacing which claim to dispute the findings that sexual abuse is harmful to children. In fact, many of these papers claim that there is a benefit to children under certain circumstances, and that harm is generally only experienced when children are molested against their will. The Journal, Pedophilia Unbound: Theory, Research and Practice, is a collection of these types of fraudulent "scientific papers." In the first chapter entitled "Tabooed Child Sexuality," the author writes that the sexual experiences of children are not less important than adults and that children, like adults, are normal sexual beings. The chapter itself seems to suggest that because pedophilia is a common occurrence around the world, it is normal and child sexuality should be studied. The author comments on the difficulties of taking on such an endeavor when child sexuality is hampered by so many taboos. This is the type of sick, demented thinking that is currently plaguing our society. Just because sex between adults and children may be a normal occurrence across the globe does not make it right. On page 79 of this publication is a paper published by Bruce Rind and Robert Bauserman entitled "An Estimate of Consequences of Adult-Non adult Sex for the Non adults in the General Population." This paper claims that sex between adults and children can be beneficial, especially between men and young boys. They cite studies which claim that the effects of adult child sex are based on several different factors including how knowledgeable the child is about sex, the level of willing participation, and the child's personal views on the negative connotations about sex, especially in the western world. This, of course, implies that the western world's views on sex, particularly sex between adults and children, is outdated. This paper further suggests that studies proving harmful effects of child sexual abuse are based on the biased samples of the population, meaning that the studies proving harmful effects are all from children who have "self-reported" child sexual abuse, and that they were likely to already have problems. Children who have allegedly experienced no harm from adult-child sex generally do not see a clinician; therefore, few studies are conducted on the benefits of such experiences. Other studies cited by this paper also claim that many boys benefited from sexual relationships with older men because it provided the opportunity to have a positive, influential relationship. To Rind and Bauserman's credit, they also admit that such samples are also based on a bias because researchers that support this may be deliberately seeking out people who have had positive experiences. The fact that sexual activities of children is even studied, encouraged, or considered a normal part of their being is, indeed, disturbing altogether.

There is also the issue of homosexuals claiming that pedophilia is a heterosexual problem as opposed to a homosexual problem. According to Steve Baldwin in his paper entitled "Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement," homosexual activist groups claim that the accusations of child molestation being a homosexual thing lends credibility to the idea that there is an effort to demonize and discredit the homosexual movement. This would be an example of the homosexual activists playing the victim role, if you will. Research on the subject, according to Baldwin, suggests, however, that male homosexuals are far more likely to molest young boys as opposed to heterosexuals. After all, as Baldwin writes in his paper, it is generally homosexual men that advocate for the lowering of age of consent laws and not straight men.

"Using twisted logic, pro-gay academics argue in various social science journals that the molestation of boys is not a gay lifestyle issue and that such men are not really homosexuals. It is simply amazing that gay propagandists and sexology "experts" are successfully bamboozling the public and the media into believing that a man's exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality! But if an exclusive attraction of a male to other males of any age is not homosexuality, what is?" (Baldwin)

Furthermore, sodomite rights groups, according to Baldwin, are actively seeking to lessen the penalties for sexual activity with underaged boys, claiming that it is a violation of civil rights. This is the consequence of moral relativism and multiculturalism coming home to roost. The fact is that attraction to young boys is almost exclusively a homosexual problem. Baldwin writes that very few homosexuals are attracted to older men, and that, according to the journal, Archives of Sexual Behavior, cited by Baldwin, 86% of pedophiles consider themselves to be homosexual.

As the homosexual rights agenda moves forward, little attention is being paid to the possible consequences concerning the safety of our children, and more attention is being paid to the idea of feeling like we are not being overly judgmental. Homosexuality is not conducive to good health, as they are more prone to suffer from sexually transmitted diseases and environments that may not be clean and sanitary. According to the Family Research Center, these facts point to homosexuality creating risk for others as well.

We certainly do not want to create a hostile environment toward homosexuals in general; however, it must be recognized that there is an element of that population that has in its sights the lowering of age of consent laws and normalizing pedophilia in order to satisfy their sexual desires. If there is not an effort to stop this, and the idea that this is a human rights issues moves forward, we could be causing untold damage to generations of children who should look to adults for protection, not live in fear of them or have sexual relationships with them. This is sick.

Recall who Obama had hired to be his so-called "Safe School Czar"...

(Obama's former "Safe School Czar" Kevin Jennings)

From the Washington Times...

EDITORIAL: At the president's pleasure
'Safe school czar' encouraged child sex with an older man
September 28, 2009

A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar". It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down.

In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.

According to Mr. Jennings' own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man's home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape "unethical." Mr. Jennings' defenders asserted that there was no evidence that he was aware the student had sex with the older man.

However, the new audiotape contradicts this claim. In 2000, Mr. Jennings gave a talk to the Iowa chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an advocacy group that promotes homosexuality in schools. On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings' own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student's concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated."

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/at-the-presidents-pleasure/

If you study history—it is the norm-—to have warped systems which promote great evils-—like slavery and the pederasty of the Samurai, Spartans and today’s muslims who have boy harems. This irrationality is far more normal and rampantl that the US Christian System of true “Justice” which was unique in the history of man-—and created an Individual Natural Rights from God-—rather than socialism (group think) where the collective good was the only consideration.

Christianity eliminated pederasty, slavery, homosexuality, polygamy as a “Good”-—at least for a few hundred years-—although Eastern cultures still practice slavery, polygamy, and pederasty to a high degree. (All behavior is learned and habituated by the “culture”. What you promote-—you get-—children embed the ideas and desires which are created.

It was a Christian revolution which developed the most brilliant, just ideas of “Good and Evil” (Wisdom) and the Virtue System which gave every single person—unborn or born, old or young, weak or strong-—all equal worth in the eyes of God and in the eyes of the laws— Rule of Law (God’s Laws)......and which created the greatest, freest cultures in history which flourished and became the most Rational/brilliant.

There is no system of Law-—based on “Rule of Man” (positive law) that is as rational and Just as God’s Laws (Christianity). None.

Promoting sodomizing others in a “Just Law” is an oxymoron and irrational.....and unnatural. It is forcing evil to be a virtue-—which it never can be because it is the use of a human being in a vile, dehumanizing, degrading, unnatural way which removes purpose and meaning from the human body. You can never promote using humans as a Means to an End-—in a Just Law.

Only Christian Ethics are based on Natural Law Theory and God’s Laws-—which is the basis of American Law and embedded into our Constitution.

To remove Natural Law—which is what pushing the vile, nihilism of sodomy-—you remove our Justice System for paganism or satanism. As the Founders and John Marshall and Blackstone and Montesquieu all knew-—you can only promote Virtue in a “Just” (virtue) System.

Reason is essential to Just Law. Remove Right Reason and you have irrational law which is unconstitutional. Pushing sodomy destroys the whole concept of Natural Law Theory and Natural Duties which demand ALL parents RAISE their own biological offspring.....the family unit is the smallest unit of a civil society. It can NEVER be warped without dehumanization of children-—buying and selling them like cattle.

Destroying the Natural Family places children in artificial environments where warping and normalizing the unnatural is easy-—it is the purpose of Marxism-—to destroy all biological connections so the State can control every single idea and loyalty programmed into the heads of your children-—so they will be “happy slaves” of the state/corporations.

These homosexuals who are promoting the NAMBLA philosophy, are the same crazy group who are always hating on the Catholic church. Yet, the same RC church, which got into serious spiritual and financial trouble for the infiltration of the priesthood by gays is being slammed by liberals for having pedophilic priests. The majority of the offenders were plain, ordinary gay men, not pedophiles, and they were involved primarily with teenage boys. That is typical for gays who seek out young, impressionable boys.

I am so confused. How is a person supposed to act about the subject anyway? Liberals want boys in the girls showers and bathrooms; and visa versa. We are not supposed to judge such aberrant behavior as it is normal [unless a person has been ordained a RC priest] - in which case, we are encouraged to assume that all priests are offenders which can justify destroying their names and parishes.

Liberals are nothing by bullies.

If they all would only turn the Jesus Christ for some guidance, maybe they would better understand the difference between right and wrong; between truth and lies; between male and female. They are all mixed up.

Kevin Jennings wrote the foreword to the book, Queering Elementary Education.
This book spells out the faux intellectual arguments behind the takeover of public schools by the LGBT pedo-facists, which is happening now right under our noses.
Btw, Jennings is now a director of a nonprofit called ARCUS, which ( get this!) promotes LGBT rights AND the “personhood” of APES.

GLSEN Gay and Lesbian and Straight Education Network is bulldozing into public schools. The gays and lesbians, of course, must educate the ignorant “straights,” by getting at their children.

Another lobbying group that bears watching is ASFAR —Americans for a Society Free of Age Restrictions—is actively lobbying for lowering age of consent laws.

These groups are incestuous—many of the same people interact in multiple groups. A common tactic is to form, and hide themselves in, local ad hoc groups with innocuous and misleading sounding names, like (name of your town) Citizens for Equality, or some such.
They must be fought on the local level.
They ARE after your children.

BTW a pedophile message board called BoyChat is an excellent place to lurk, if you want to eavesdrop on actual, avowed pedophiles, talking among themselves—in order to get a handle on their thought processes.

The rules of the board forbid participants from getting too specific. That said, they get pretty specific.

Particularly interesting, IMO, are threads discussing high-profile prosecutions of pedophiles.
Also, threads discussing hatred of “antis” —anti-pedo activists. IOW, individuals and groups who abhor sexual exploitation of children, and who and actively pursue the arrest and conviction of pedophiles. The thinly concealed hatred is worth noting.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.