Posted on 11/07/2015 5:27:33 AM PST by Kaslin
Is the Postal Service taking its captive customers those who have no choice but to do business with it for granted?
That's one of the suggestions of a recent report from the Tax Foundation.
It is clear the Postal Service thinks one way about its commercial products and another about the delivery of regular mail on which it has a monopoly.
For instance, the Postal Service's approach to its package delivery business has been to add seven-day-a-week delivery in 650 cities. According to a press release, "Sunday delivery serves the needs of valued customers in today's busy online world while at the same time, generates new revenue [sic] for the Postal Service.'
For regular mail, the Postal Service has focused on cutting its losses. It closed so many mail-handling centers so quickly that late deliveries skyrocketed and Congress finally had to step in and halt the downsizing until delivery times improve. Since 2009, it has pushed to cut Saturday delivery and claimed it could save $3.1 billion per year by doing so.
But this raises a question:
"If six-day-a-week mail delivery harms profitability, how does seven-day-a-week merchandise delivery help the bottom line?" the report's authors ask.
Nothing has helped the bottom line in recent years. Volume of the first-class mail on which it has a monopoly started downward with the Great Recession and never recovered as business shifted to the Internet.
As a result, the Postal Service, which is supposed to be independent but has tapped out its $15 billion line of federal credit, has not turned a profit since 2006. Its losses since then amount to more than $51 billion, and it already was down nearly $3 billion after the first quarter of this year.
Critics say it would turn a profit if not for the requirement in the 2006 postal reform legislation that it pre-fund its benefits. But the losses, which have been as high as nearly $16 billion in a single year, far outstrip the amount needed to meet the pre-funding requirement. And anyway, the Postal Service has not paid into the benefits fund in more than four years, and its current unfunded liability for benefits and all other expenses now sits at nearly $100 billion.
The Postal Service says it has to enter these side businesses package delivery, grocery delivery in big cities, even real-time delivery of fresh fish to restaurants in Manhattan – to survive. The Internet has meant less first-class mail but more packages as people order products online. The Postal Service says it's merely shifting its emphasis to these new profit centers.
But there are three problems with this argument:
We depend on the Postal Service to do that which only it can do deliver the mail, and its ability to do so in recent years has reached alarming levels;
We have numerous options for package delivery in the private sector;
And the investment decisions the Postal Service makes do not inspire confidence.
As the report points out, the Postal Service remains one of the federal government's most popular agencies, with more than 70 percent of Americans saying it does a good job. But that figure is in jeopardy thanks to the dramatic rise in late deliveries.
In the first quarter of 2015, only 63.1 percent of single first-class mail arrived on time. In the first quarter of 2014, it was 84.1 percent. It fell from 89 percent to 80 percent for 3- to 5-day first-class pre-sort mail – the easiest, most profitable mail the Postal Service handles.
That, and the fact the new emphasis on package delivery is necessitating an expensive retooling of the Postal Service's huge vehicle fleet, ought to mean a return to focus on basics.
Instead, the Postal Service says its side businesses are necessary profit centers. But even that's unclear. The cost side of the ledger for the Postal Service's competitive businesses reflects only a bit more than half the actual expenses. The rest is consigned to general overhead we own a fleet, and the fleet carried packages or assigned specifically to the letter-carrying side.
"Given most of those products have low cost coverage ratios, far below the average for market-dominant products, it would not take much of a cost misallocation for some competitive-market products that are actually losing money to show up as profitable in the Service's financial statements," the report said.
Some have been some spectacular losers, such as MetroPost, a same-day delivery service piloted in San Francisco and New York. The Postal Service's inspector general found that in San Francisco only 95 packages were sent over a 5-month period. The Postal Service spent more than $10,000 on the project and made just $760. The Postal Service's response to this was, of course, to close the San Francisco operation but expand the service to the Washington, D.C., area.
Some, such as the 3- to 5-day package operation, probably make a profit. But the point is the Postal Service is failing at the mission only it can do and using its monopoly advantages to muscle out responsible private competitors.
We don't need that. What we do need is for the Postal Service to go back to what it was created to do and focus on doing that really well.
I wonder how many fewer postal employees would be necessary if they weren’t overwhelmed with junk mail and advertising flyers.
Postal Service’s ‘Priority’ Should Be Delivering Mail...TO THE RIGHT ADDRESS.
There, set the correct priority based upon experience with the socialist postal system.
It’s what keeps the postal service in business
Is the advertising, which is much cheaper to mail, what keeps the post office in business or what keeps it in debt?
WHAT? You expect consistency from the government? Ha!
Yeah, like the Muslims who wouldn't deliver booze because of their religious beliefs and were awarded $247,000 but Kim Davis was put in jail for standing by hers.
The Postal Service spent more than $10,000 on the project and made just $760.
Read tagline
Exactly. Sometimes I wished I had a mailbox next to my regular one that has a chute were the mailman can drop the chunk mail in. The advertising flyers don’t do anything for me. I don’t let anyone tell me what to buy.
It’s called liberal logic.
***Postal Service’s ‘Priority’ Should Be Delivering Mail...TO THE RIGHT ADDRESS.***
I’ve noticed the most errors are on Saturday delivery. I mailed a check to my daughter last year who lives in a large city. It was delivered to an wrong address far away from where she lives. The recipient was honest enough to get it to her.
I have a positive view of junk mail... 6 days a week they give me, for FREE, something to tear up to use for starting the woodstove.
——If six-day-a-week mail delivery harms profitability, how does seven-day-a-week merchandise delivery help the bottom line?” the report’s authors ask——
The fallacy in the question is general vs: specific
General delivery to all customers on Saturday/Sunday requires a much more expensive labor bill than delivery to a very few customers on some weekends
Mostly, the package delivery revenue supports the general delivery that doesn’t support its self
But, the answer might be made in Germany.....
My nephew and family are in Germany for a two year training session. They get no first class mail. The postal workers have apparently been on strike since May and no first class mail. My sister has adapted however and has boned up on her e mail and other computer/phone communications skills.
The discovery might be that we really don’t need mail at all any way
The Postal Service was the first ifrastructure glue holding America together. Roads were built not for travel, but for postal delivery, and distances between towns was measured from post office to post office. Since those days post offices have moved their locations and I don’t know what the government uses for a distance calculator now.
The USPS is another government sinkhole intended to waste tax payer money and increase Dem coffers via union support.
Uh....this is also why you don’t put your ballots in the mail if you live in a conservative neighborhood.
That is not a guess, it is a publicly stated charge by county and state GOP leaders with access to voter roles and whether their votes were counted or not.
My wife recently sent two pieces of mail from Maryland. One to Michigan and one to England. Guess which on arrived first?
Ding ding ding-The winner is the one not served by USPS
https://www.skubana.com/the-usps-epacket-program-and-how-it-affects-your-e-commerce/
Trilateral agreement between USPS, China, and Hong Kong undercuts US businesses.
The Post Office needs to change to every-other-day delivery; half of neighborhoods get Monday-Wednesday-Friday delivery, the other half gets Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday.
They could then get rid of half of everyone involved in delivery of mail, and they wouldn’t have to buy new delivery vehicles for a long time.
How many people would be actually harmed in any way by this policy?
I look at junk mail much the same way. SOMETIMES, I will even open and read it when sitting on the loo or needing something to put that heated up slice of pizza on. Those oversized political postcards are the best. Just the right size for warmed up leftovers and to sweep up all the crumbs when you’re done!
I'm beginning to wonder if I live in a bazarro world or not
That’s a great idea. I have a PO Box, as the snowplows regularly destroy the mailboxes on our road and I pick up my mail once a week.
Works for me, though it does p*ss me off that I have to PAY for what should be a SERIVCE to us Rural folk - we’re saving the P.O. time, money and gasoline!!
Maybe we could go one step further on your idea and for rural areas, people come to the PO to pick up their mail at no cost? Maybe I should drop the PO Box and just continually keep my mail on ‘hold?’ LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.