Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Yes he is entirely wrong.

When the gun is broken and empty, it cannot be pointed. The stock and action are pointing in one direction and the barrels in another. It is in one of those rare conditions where it is totally safe.


16 posted on 11/03/2015 4:53:19 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog

Short of carrying the stock in one hand and the barrel in the other you really can’t make a gun any safer.

I used to carry my old single shot .410 broken over the shoulder like that or at my side in one hand.


18 posted on 11/03/2015 4:57:50 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
When the gun is broken and empty, it cannot be pointed. The stock and action are pointing in one direction and the barrels in another. It is in one of those rare conditions where it is totally safe.

That's true, of course. But, I think the point where the guy is technically correct (and, again, it's a technicality--the gun was safe, and the guy is clearly trying to get attention for his new site) is that every gun--even in the rare conditions where it is totally safe--should be treated as if it is not totally safe. The reasoning behind that is that people are creatures of habit, and so you want people to be in the habit of carrying the gun in the same way (muzzle down), regardless of whether the gun is loaded or broken and empty.

19 posted on 11/03/2015 5:01:07 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson