Yes, and the reason Chicago has such high violent crime rates is because Vermont has lax gun laws.
At this point, it is almost a day later and they still haven’t identified the gunman. Not doing so should create suspicions that there is a reason the gunman hasn’t been identified.
I think that when such suspects are from a “protected class”, there will be an effort by the authorities to ‘cleanse’ their only existence to eliminate references to one religion in particular, gang affiliation, political affiliation, incriminating photographs, etc.
Because “We don’t want to reinforce stereotypes”, which is complete b.s.
And the media constantly screams for more gun laws.
"Still looking for YouTube Video to blame it on if TEA Party is not responsible.
Laws don’t stop criminals, cops stop criminals.
And if there’s not a cop handy, which there usually isn’t, you better be armed to stop ‘em yourself.
“...more and stricter laws, rules, regulations and restrictions are needed. Maybe make murder by firearm illegal.”
No, no, no. The killer was obviously a member of the NRA (National Rifle Association). :o) All that needs to happen is for the NRA to refuse membership to killers.
I read a few days ago that NO killer anywhere was a member of the NRA, so, actually, they are doing a good job of refusing membership to killers. However, that must be wrong because I heard Hillary say, in a speech very recently, it’s the fault of the NRA when people get killed.
Therefore, it can’t be both ways - either the NRA has killers as members or they don’t. The facts say they don’t. We must conclude Hillary is wrong, but we know she is never wrong, never takes responsibility for anything she says or does that is wrong (as in “illegal”).
Maybe make murder by firearm illegal.
they tried that one already.
That’s because criminals don’t obey laws shockingly.
Gun control advocates don’t want law abiding citizens to have guns, because they wish to control law abiding citizens via laws.
It really isn’t hard to understand.
A gun free zone?
But the phrase, “when seconds count, the police are only minutes away” applies. Cops - even before Obama and BLM tied their hands - can’t be everywhere.
However, an armed populace increases their own safety exponentially until the cops arrive.
Obamas excuse for “gun control” is exactly the same as was Hitler’s...people control.
One article says cops shot him about 20 times. That’s graveyard dead. He shot a man dead by a bicycle and then 2 women when leaving the first killing.
He made his final stand between Taco Bell and Wendy’s.
Of course he had an AR 15.
Interesting that the shooter could hit three people but miss the cops. That should be proof enough for anyone that if you have a gun and can shoot back it lessons the perp’s sill level.
Colorado Springs is a conservative city.
This is unusual.
Then again, if he didn’t have his AR-15, he wouldn’t have gone out on a deadly rampage.
Yeah, sure.
Probably another assault weapon dragging it’s unwilling owner to a mass shooting.
CO Springs is supported mostly by far with government funding, and there are gobs of folks from the Middle East there.
Many in government positions, being originally from New York or New Jersey (some after short stays in California), publicize CO as being very conservative. It is, in fact, very regulated and very socially liberal. Big marijuana operations are popping up all over the Range. Crime is already going up.
Ergo, it must be something "black" or "Muslim" related. There is no other reasonable explanation.