Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HAUNTED HILLARY: FBI INQUIRY LOOMS 'SHE'S TOO BIG TO JAIL'
Drudge Report ^ | October 31,2015 | Druge ANITA KUMAR AND GREG GORDON McClatchy Washington Bureau

Posted on 11/01/2015 4:12:38 AM PST by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: Gaffer

That’s Mcclatchy newspapers,a subsidiary of CNBC. You could have read no further than when they claimed she had put her private email scandal on Benghazi behind her,there are still thousands to be real eased,just look at yesterday’s,she was told by the embassy in Tripoli that they should not blame the video for the attack,so much for putting it behind her.
The server is the major one that is haunting her and they are coming up with every excuse in the book to clear her of multiple felonies,she would gladly accept being called stupid and incompetent rather than heading to leavenworth. Of course the brain dead morons in the democrat party all fellow communist couldn’t care less they would vote for Adolf if he came back as a democrat


41 posted on 11/01/2015 5:44:29 AM PST by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

“That was true. It wasn’t a single time. It was many times.”

Yes and Hillary could probably say that she has never told a single lie, they always come in multiples.


42 posted on 11/01/2015 5:44:51 AM PST by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

Jeez,

How much do you have to see.

Nothing is going to happen to Hillary. The DOJ has already argued before Judges that Hillary’s private system didn’t violate anything (in FOIA cases)

The Media needs people to believe there was a real investigation and they were prepared to Prosecute Hillary.

There’s a reason HIllary keeps laughing about this.

.


43 posted on 11/01/2015 5:45:13 AM PST by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Whether or not the material was marked classified seems like a deflection from the real verifiable crimes. It's like Johnny Cochran saying the gloves did not fit while ignoring mountains of other criminal evidence.

1.) It's laughable that Clinton did not know that sensitive emails were being redacted.
2.) Clinton knowingly maintained her own server in a premeditated move to obstruct justice, not to mention lying about the destruction of evidence (wiping).

Here is a nice summary of all the laws we know she violated.
The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now
44 posted on 11/01/2015 5:47:53 AM PST by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Yes, yes, yes. She was Secretary of State, for heavens’ sake, not some low-level clerk. She had undergone training on what info was de-facto classified, sensitive, etc. If she’s too dumb or remiss to follow the basic training manual, then how is she qualified to be President?


45 posted on 11/01/2015 5:54:46 AM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
From the article:

"If the emails were not marked, it would not be possible - at least not in my view - to establish that Ms. Clinton knowingly mishandled classified information," he said."How was she to know that this was classified if it was not marked"

This is the sort of MISINFORMATION that we will have to get used to. Hillary Clinton was the chief executive of the State Department. Are we to believe that she can read material that is Top Secret SCI and not suspect that it is classified. If she does and sent it along she is GUILTY. But, as I understand it, if she didn't recognize it as TS material and passed it on she is GUILTY.

Correct me if I'm wrong about that.

46 posted on 11/01/2015 5:55:50 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Soliciting opinions of just how independent the FBI is from the regime. Would love to think Hillary could pay for all of her crimes, but I’m exhausted from thinking it can actually happen and sick of getting my hopes up.


47 posted on 11/01/2015 5:55:53 AM PST by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Not “big”.
Powerful and vindictive.
One law for us, another for the rich.


48 posted on 11/01/2015 5:56:09 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The whole article is straight from the bowels of Hillary’s propaganda machine. It is a trial balloon (no pun intended, unfortunately) testing dodges and excuses. Will the public accept the argument that big deal politicians are above the law? Petraeus was a nationally known, top general and CIA chief. If he wasn’t too big to prosecute for petty bs, why would Hillary be exempt for serious crimes?

The various “lawyers” claim that the law requires proof of Hillary’s intent to mishandle classified information — that is 100% false, and they know it. The laws are written precisely to avoid that game; the physical facts are what matter. Whether classified material is “unmarked at the time” does not matter either. Otherwise every spy could merely remove the labels to operate with impunity. General Petreaus was convicted for having his personal journals at home, where his girlfriend saw them, but no one else; he didn’t get a pass because “classified diary” wasn’t written on the covers.

The article also pronounces as fact that Hillary is home free from the Benghazi Committee. But the Committee has not completed its interviews and investigation, and has not released a comprehensive analysis and findings. When that shoe drops, the truth will be damaging, but of course Hillary and her hirelings will spin like Iranian centrifuges.


49 posted on 11/01/2015 5:57:43 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Are there ankle bracelets large enough?


50 posted on 11/01/2015 5:59:52 AM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

“Charles the First wasn’t too big to get his head cut off...”

Who will be our Oliver Cromwell?


51 posted on 11/01/2015 6:02:21 AM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
'SHE'S TOO BIG TO JAIL'

Not to worry. Following her trial, conviction, and sentencing for treason, there will be enough rope to hang her.

52 posted on 11/01/2015 6:07:03 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I like that one!


53 posted on 11/01/2015 6:08:31 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

At the end of the day, no matter how much enmity they hold toward one another, ideology trumps all and he’ll save her bacon. Watch and see.


54 posted on 11/01/2015 6:11:00 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Chewbarkah, well said. You are right on the money. My blood boiled when I read the intentional lies in this article. This is just the left creating their “narrative”. The truth and the American people be damned...


55 posted on 11/01/2015 6:19:24 AM PST by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

thanks that will work


56 posted on 11/01/2015 6:20:58 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

57 posted on 11/01/2015 6:22:50 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Historically, those that were too big to imprison were BANISHED! “TO the MOON with her! (Or maybe Pitcairn’s Island)


58 posted on 11/01/2015 6:24:31 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Nobody is above the law. How many Illinois governors are in prison or have been?


59 posted on 11/01/2015 6:28:45 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
“Too Big to JAIL” Is that a “FAT Joke?”
60 posted on 11/01/2015 6:45:38 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson