What were the private security contractors doing in Libya in the first place?
___
In a nutshell, Hitlery’s State Department, in conjunction with the CIA, was illegally funneling arms from Benghazi through Turkey to the rebels in Syria. An effective security detail would have drawn unwanted attention to their unauthorized activities. Those individuals involved, including Ambassador Stevens, I believe, were fully cognizant of the dangers involved as well as the illegality of it. However, the people involved didn’t deserve to be abandoned when it all fell apart.
The only thing I have ever read about the attack in Bengazi that made any sense was the plot to have Amb Stevens kidnapped in order to exchange him for the blind Sheik. All the background narratives make no sense without that. Why Stevens could not get protection, why the CIA as deliberately delayed. What went wrong was the fire that killed Stevens, so the muzzies just finished off the rest of them. There has been a lot more of the background on how the video got made in the first place. Sorry I can’t recall all of it and I didn’t save it, but there were connections that were never addressed by the Committee because they probably don’t know about it. Wish I could remember where I got that from. It made sense of the whole affair.