Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one
Post 25 links a YouTube video of her explicitly blaming the video - no way to weasel out of it! Your link isn't nearly as damning. I would go with the link in post 25 because the point is made that she was lying about never having directly tied the two together or that she never stated that the attack was directly caused by response to the video that virtually no one ever viewed.
44 posted on 10/23/2015 6:34:31 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1; RC one

She says…
“…heavy assault on our post in Benghazi, that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American Embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

It’s presented as similar, but separate incidents. She uses “post” in reference to Benghazi and Embassies in relation to the video.

Pretty clear she was using just enough of the Obama/Rice storey-line to play along, but enough lawyer speak to cover her ample rear.


58 posted on 10/23/2015 12:40:32 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson