Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge says Hillary Clinton’s server is private
Washington Times ^ | 10/7/15 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 10/07/2015 9:40:07 PM PDT by Nachum

A federal judge ordered the State Department Wednesday to request former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton not delete any government business emails she may still have, but said he doubts he can force her to do anything. Judge Reggie B. Walton said since Mrs. Clinton used her own BlackBerry and computer devices, and kept her email server at her home, he doesn’t have authority over the records she created on those. The ruling is a significant victory for Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration, which has argued it has already gone above and beyond its duties under the law in trying

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; email; hillary; hillaryemailserver; policestate; private; reggiewalton; server; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Fix => In
1 posted on 10/07/2015 9:40:07 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

shocking... /s


2 posted on 10/07/2015 9:41:09 PM PDT by proust (If Obama was accused of being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 10/07/2015 9:41:41 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Fix => In

Ho, ho, ho, Green Giant.

This game has only just begun.


4 posted on 10/07/2015 9:43:19 PM PDT by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah, like Americans’ phone calls, e-mails, and medical records are “private” ...

To hell with this judge.
To hell with those he is protecting.
To hell with those who are paying him off.
And to hell with this corrupt federal government.

I can barely wait for Donald Trump to become POTUS - and kick the living crap out of these treasonous bastards!


5 posted on 10/07/2015 9:46:37 PM PDT by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s not over yet ... that is just one judge. Judicial Watch is forcing the issue in another case .....

From the link: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/256072-new-front-opened-in-battle-over-clinton-email-server

Lawyers with Judicial Watch on Tuesday said they would demand that the department declare whether Clinton received explicit approval to use a private email account and personal server while serving as secretary of State.

Either Clinton was allowed to use the setup, in which case the server should be considered an official government system of records and ought to be handed back to the department, they said, or she wasn’t, in which case Clinton operated outside the agency’s rules.

“We need to know whether or not Mrs. Clinton was authorized to use that system of records,” Judicial Watch attorney Michael Bekesha told a federal judge.

She was either approved to use the sever, he added, “or she was a rogue employee.”


6 posted on 10/07/2015 9:48:19 PM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hey Yer Honor - she conducted government business on it.


7 posted on 10/07/2015 9:48:21 PM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

i get it. She’s required to use the government system for security and tansparency. She decides not to follow the relations. She users her own system to circumvent the goal pf using the government system. So we can’t see them so she violates the law and the judge is complicit in supporting that violation. Great stuff.


8 posted on 10/07/2015 9:50:50 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Barry has an ace in the hole with these emails. It’s to his advantage to make sure judges don’t remove this leverage. No doubt at all there are games going on behind the scenes, the real question is can the “other” copies (ie. cloud, receiver) be obtained without needing the cooperation of a judicial lackey.


9 posted on 10/07/2015 9:51:51 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And if I used my personally owned PC to send and receive classified documents it would be hunky-dory, right?


10 posted on 10/07/2015 9:53:08 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

only conservatives have to obey laws.


11 posted on 10/07/2015 9:54:34 PM PDT by Cubs Fan ( liberalism=totalitarianism- http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/06/the-new-totalitarians-are-here/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

Hillary has publicly claimed she had permission. Several times.


12 posted on 10/07/2015 9:55:06 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

Better, if you used your personally-owned PC to defraud thousands of credit-card users, that too would be both hunky and dory.


13 posted on 10/07/2015 9:55:21 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That server is a crime scene, and should be treated as such.


14 posted on 10/07/2015 9:56:24 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

According to this judge that would be the case.


15 posted on 10/07/2015 9:57:46 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Whatever! Our government is so pathetically transparent!


16 posted on 10/07/2015 10:00:03 PM PDT by vpintheak (A Free Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; null and void; Velveeta; Myrddin; Califreak; Salvation; WildHighlander57; Gefn; ...

Fix => In

Yep. Did $ change hands? Perhaps in the future for a child's college education? Just askin'...

.

17 posted on 10/07/2015 10:01:36 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

sure, if your last name happens to be Clinton

:-(


18 posted on 10/07/2015 10:05:02 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

OK...so if anyone else commits a crime on their computer, servers, then you can’t get access to them because they’re—private?


19 posted on 10/07/2015 10:05:17 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Hillary has publicly claimed she had permission. Several times.

*************************************

She has claimed that. Judicial Watch is requesting that State be forced to answer definitively on the question. It’s damning either way - Hillary is lying or somebody at State is likely in big trouble for saying she could do it. FBI just seized 4 State Dept. servers trying to figure out WHO (State Dept. aides) was transferring classified info to Hillary’s system - major felony trouble for whoever did it.

“Clinton “essentially circumvented millions of dollars’ worth of cybersecurity investment that the federal government puts within the State Department,” said Justin Harvey, chief security officer of Fidelis Cybersecurity.

Link: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_EMAILS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-10-07-21-55-59


20 posted on 10/07/2015 10:10:29 PM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson