Posted on 10/06/2015 9:10:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
By Monday, interestingly enough, the Russian invasion of Syria was receding as a topic of public concern. Apparently there no longer seemed anything explosive in the tidings of Vladimir Putin's slam-bang entry into that remote theater of conflict. This was notwithstanding those Russian airstrikes against the anti-Assad rebels whom the United States, supposedly, has been encouraging.
When President Obama went before the TV cameras late last week, it was chiefly to flog anyone unable to fall in with the Absolute Necessity of Common-Sense Gun Control. "Russian planes, what Russian planes?" our Nobel Peace Prize-winning leader might as well have said. Donald Trump shrugged off the whole episode: Putin would get bogged down in Syria, just wait and see. The whole thing would take care of itself.
That confident declaration had some appeal for Americans in view of the absence of realistic options for making Czar Vladimir cry uncle. When has Putin obliged with demands -- or Obama with a foreign policy measure (if he even deems it worth noticing)? I imagine Putin's admiration of Obama, on a scale of 1 to 10, comes in somewhere around negative 5.
Should that concern us? The question is larger than the purely subsidiary question: What ought we do about Syria, to which the obvious answer is -- ah, well, let's, ah, think about that one just a bit. The moment for doing anything "about Syria" came a couple of years back, just before Obama's famous "red line" against Syrian use of chemical weapons against the rebels mysteriously vanished from view.
That subsidiary question comes on for analysis only within the context of the grand question: What do Americans suppose their country's role in the world to be? And who's going to make their idea, if there is an idea, stick?
That the United States, with only 5 percent of the world's population, can't control the world is obvious to anyone with half a brain cell. That this reality suggests evasion as the best strategy when it comes to "foreign" issues (you know -- excepting climate change) is a notion as brainless as the first one: however popular it may seem to a people tired of boots-on-the-ground interventions in "other people's" affairs. It turns out that "other people's" affairs have a direct bearing on own affairs, and those of people in whose well-being we have a stake -- say, the European nations flooded with refugees from the Syrian war in which we appear to have only a marginal interest.
Ah, if only the British lion could again keep the world's peace, as in the comfortable days of yore! But that ol' lion, to adapt a Texanism, won't hunt. And hasn't for 50 years. Like it or not, no other country has the power and the moral resources, such as they are, that the United States possesses to restrain the worst (not all, just the worst) of humanity's enemies. I miss the lion's old-time roar; but here we are, with enemies glaring directly at us, if we ever took the time to notice.
What snared that very premature Nobel Peace Prize for Obama was the perception -- one he likely shared -- that his commitment to words over deeds would soon have even the bad guys beating swords into plowshares.
We see how that's worked out. We have a president who loves to talk -- mostly about himself -- and hates to act (see, for example, the way he scuffed out the red line over chemical weapons in Syria). He's all talk and no action, our president, and malignant foreign types know they can do pretty much what they like without provoking him.
Continued backlash against the Iraq War keeps renewing Obama's license to golf while Syria and Ukraine burn -- which is a pity, because no other issue deserves as much campaign-year reassessment as what we think this country should be doing in the world. A laggard economy (yes, thank you for that, too, Mr. President) can empty your pockets. A blubbery, incoherent devotion to talk over action when foreign dangers loom -- well, that can kill you.
Putin knows Obama will never respond to any provocation, no matter how grave. He has a big green light to do whatever he wants for the next 15 months. He is stepping on the gas.
Global Nannies...
Oy Vey!!
How'd that work out?
I'm not sure I want any "action" he'd contemplate.
There is no doubt in my mind about that. I think Putin tested this a bit in the Ukraine and confirmed that Obama would just bang some empty kettles. He now seems to be fully implementing his plan and hitting the gas too.
Tried and tested, Obama will do nothing.
A pot banger.
(Sorry, Fierce Farce)
See, now that would have been a story if only Bush had done that. Because Obama did it...ooops.
You are probably right, but Russia killing Muslims will make him angry.
Here is a video clip that expresses brutally but correctly how the Russian special forces are playing the game...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF-iGTocZPA
Bad time to be a Militant in Syria, too friggin bad!
Sic Semper Tyrranus!!
Obama thinks talk can stop bullets. Putin knows that Obama just wants to run out the clock and drop his failures on the next person to succeed him. Of course, Putin knew this all along and can act with impunity knowing full well that Obama has no the nerve, fortitude, or resolve to do anything. Putin’s inherently a dangerous guy, but he’s crafty and Obama has done nothing but further empower him.
I’ve got to hand it to Putin. His timing was perfect.
Hopefully Russia deals with the Islamic terrorists they same way it dealt with the Islamic pirates. They disarmed them, tied them up, put them back in their boats and then used them for target practice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.