Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candidates Talk Tax Cuts But Go AWOL On Spending Cuts
IBD ^ | 10/01/2015 | Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 10/01/2015 6:40:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Cutting taxes is great, but as I said, it must be done alongside genuine spending restraint — meaning serious changes to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and Affordable Care Act subsidies, which are consuming an ever-growing share of the budget.

Doing one without the other would just kick the can farther down the road, an exercise that politicians are very good at.

The good news for the candidates is that a plan to cut spending isn't that hard — on paper, at least. Cato Institute's Dan Mitchell calculated that we could balance the budget by 2021 by capping spending growth at 2% annually. Allowing spending to grow by 3% annually would balance the budget by 2024.

Now, those numbers are based on current tax policy. If lawmakers want big tax cuts, there will need to be commensurately greater levels of spending restraint. The difficulty, of course, is to persuade politicians to implement such spending constraints and actually stick to them in the long run.

That's made harder by the fact that the only realistic way to limit spending growth to 2% or 3% per year is to reform the fastest-growing programs in our budget, or the so-called entitlements. That would require standing up against the politically powerful special interests that benefit from these programs.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; spending; taxcuts; taxes; veroniquederugy

1 posted on 10/01/2015 6:40:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think Trump has already addressed stupid things we fund and getting rid of them.


2 posted on 10/01/2015 6:42:46 AM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Elimination of many of the regulators and subsidies are a big part of the Cruz policy. It costs money to regulate and subsidize so eliminating them is cutting spending.


3 posted on 10/01/2015 6:43:14 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Trump has cuts. Send home illegals, and don't let those back or in who aren't productive citizens. Jobs would go to US citizens who now collect government freebies. Common Core - Dept of Education meddling would be cut.

Why do these articles always neglect to emphasize that Trump stands way above the dwarfs on these issues?

4 posted on 10/01/2015 6:44:41 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo
A President Trump can task a competent corporate waste cutter ( maybe Carly Fiorina ), to look into this:

Sen. Tom Coburn shows what $28 billion in government waste looks like


5 posted on 10/01/2015 6:47:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grania
Jobs would go to US citizens who now collect government freebies

The problem isn't lack of jobs. There are jobs. The biggest hurdle is that the vast majority of those on the dole don't WANT job. Why work when you can get paid to do nothing? They have a bone deep sense of entitlement, and an equally bone deep laziness. And until they're forcibly kicked out of the government's taxpayer funded trough they'll continue feeding with both front trotters in it.

6 posted on 10/01/2015 6:53:06 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

FWIW, aren’t there still technically laws on the books that those collecting benefits (including unemployment) have to be looking for jobs, and take them if they’re available? That whole process has become a farce, because of the availability of cheaper immigrant and illegal labor.


7 posted on 10/01/2015 6:58:26 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t it telling how NO one in the Establishment Media ever asks a Demcorat how they plan to PAY for all the new spending they promise but talk Tax Cuts and they all come screaming “how you going to pay for it”.


8 posted on 10/01/2015 6:58:33 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Jesus!

Can you give these people a minute? It’s only October of the year before the election!


9 posted on 10/01/2015 7:00:08 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I want to hear about spending cuts. If a candidate just talks about tax cuts, he isn’t serious.


10 posted on 10/01/2015 7:11:32 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
FWIW, aren’t there still technically laws on the books that those collecting benefits (including unemployment) have to be looking for jobs, and take them if they’re available?

Supposedly. I'm not very familiar with welfare law, but I believe that only applies to those on unemployment compensation. I'm pretty sure recipients of AFDC and SNAP don't have to do anything (and they don't). Study done several years ago showed that most people on unemployment didn't find jobs until the unemployment ran out.

11 posted on 10/01/2015 7:14:42 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It’s a tax cut and engine of growth all wrapped into one. Just getting regulations back to pre-Obama, that would be a huge benefit. Kick it back to pre-2000 and we will hum along.

One thing I believe that Obama and his fellow Travelers are utterly sickened by is that America continues to steamroll the rest of the world. Japan is over. Russia is a has been country. The EU is going to fracture either by design due to socialism or irrational immigration. China is already stumbling as their centrally planned economy sputters out of OPM.

That leaves America alone again at the top, at least economically. If we can get her back on the moral road it’ll be American centuries for as long as the eye can see.


12 posted on 10/02/2015 7:24:16 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grania

Cruz has cuts. Cruz’s plan is the same as Trump’s. Cruz handles jobs, taxes and DOE, etc., too.

The difference between Cruz and Trump is that one is a Constitutional conservative and the other is a NY Democrat/master marketer.


13 posted on 10/02/2015 7:28:00 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson