Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WND EXCLUSIVE POLL: MOST U.S. MUSLIMS WOULD TRADE CONSTITUTION FOR SHARIAH
http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/poll-most-u-s-muslims-would-trade-constitution-for-shariah/ ^

Posted on 09/25/2015 9:56:37 PM PDT by bryan999

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: bryan999

send them back to Krapistan while we still can!


21 posted on 09/25/2015 10:42:26 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
The Constitution is the law of the land. Any attempt to supplant it with any other form of rule is simply an act of subversion and sedition. Those who attempt to do so should be imprisoned and/or deported. Got it? Good.


22 posted on 09/25/2015 10:51:49 PM PDT by Viking2002 (The Avatar is back by popular request.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer; All
"All “U.S. Muslims” haven’t a flippin’ clue what the Constitution is."

I agree. Sadly, probably most USA citizens don’t know why the Constitution was made either, which was to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.

23 posted on 09/25/2015 10:56:09 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

To help understand the threat, know that there is no such thing as a moderate muslim.


24 posted on 09/25/2015 10:58:48 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
“For any candidate to suggest that someone should not be elected president because of what he or she may believe is nothing short of religious bigotry,”

I am a religious bigot!!!!!!!

25 posted on 09/25/2015 10:59:04 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

it would be nice to send them back to Krapistand but these muzzies are so darn dense!

They want everything THEIR WAY or You’re on the Highway.
& according to this video link that’s what it is looking like

If they were only smart enough to build their own schools & academies.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/09/video-muslims-taunt-nj-school-officials-were-going-to-be-the-majority-soon/


26 posted on 09/25/2015 11:02:37 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (Shrimp Egg Foo Young- A tasty dish! gravy on the side please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.


27 posted on 09/25/2015 11:07:20 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
We should deport the ones that would put Shariah above our Constitution.

Does their stated preference for Shariah over the Constitution automatically make them domestic enemies? If it does, should they be deported? It sounds like a case can be made. Is it our responsibility? ". . . I further commit myself to defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, . . "

28 posted on 09/25/2015 11:12:44 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001; bryan999; All

Doesn’t our President take an oath to defend the Constitution. No believing Muslim could take this oath without lying (which is OK to do to Infidels), therefore no Muslim can be President. Before Catholics could be president, there was the similar argument that they would serve the Pope first, not the Constitution.

According to a local newspaper report, Omar Ahmad, a founder of CAIR, told a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The reporter paraphrased Ahmad saying, “The Quran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”


29 posted on 09/25/2015 11:19:58 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
> Doesn’t our President take an oath to defend the Constitution. No believing Muslim could take this oath without lying (which is OK to do to Infidels), therefore no Muslim can be President. the Taqiyyan Lyin' President ala The Manchurian Candidate


30 posted on 09/25/2015 11:32:31 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
> Doesn’t our President take an oath to defend the Constitution. No believing Muslim could take this oath without lying (which is OK to do to Infidels), therefore no Muslim can be President.

the Taqiyyan Lyin' President ala The Manchurian Candidate


31 posted on 09/25/2015 11:32:59 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Pushback: Peaceful Muslims called “irrelevant”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/pushback-peaceful-muslims-called-irrelevant/


32 posted on 09/26/2015 12:18:57 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Time for a fullscale House open set of hearings on CAIR, with FBI, CIA, and other law enforcement agencies testifying, including Israeli Mossad agents (lots of talking retired leaders around).

Boy would that uncover some re camel shit.


33 posted on 09/26/2015 12:30:42 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Then they can go home to the Mideast.


34 posted on 09/26/2015 12:34:24 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
“For any candidate to suggest that someone should not be elected president because of what he or she may believe..."

This is a really stupid comment. Obviously people judge whether or not someone should be elected president by the things they believe. How else should we judge them? By the way they dress?

35 posted on 09/26/2015 1:31:41 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode ("go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

The actual report from the polling group.

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/

Interesting. 600 Muslims 55% male. 20% to 25% advocate violence or other extreme measures against those who slander [my word] Islam...... overall 51% would pick Shariah over US law.


36 posted on 09/26/2015 3:11:18 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

P.S. IMO, the other 49% are just lying.


37 posted on 09/26/2015 3:12:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bryan999
I for one welcome our new Mohammedan overlords.


38 posted on 09/26/2015 3:17:53 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
We should deport the ones that would put Shariah above our Constitution.

Sedition is "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch," especially the advocacy of violent revolution.

No country can tolerate sedition, anymore than it can tolerate open borders, and survive.

This is the legal way in which Mohammedanism can be suppressed in our country, without violating the Constitution.

The Founders made a mistake in the First Amendment. They should have explicitly disqualified religions that are intolerant of other religions, and that advocate the violent overthrow of the government.

The reason for this oversight was probably ignorance of Mohammedanism (certainly Jefferson was ignorant of Islam, as he didn't come to an understanding of Mohammedanism until the attacks of the "Barbary pirates" on American shipping) and a failure to foresee substantial Mohammedan immigration to America.

39 posted on 09/26/2015 3:28:18 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Well duh, they are muslim...


40 posted on 09/26/2015 3:52:39 AM PDT by aces (Jesus Saves not Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson