Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton to propose Obamacare reforms (Affordable Pill Act?)
Washington Examiner ^ | 9/21/14 | Ariel Cohen

Posted on 09/22/2015 1:40:29 AM PDT by Libloather

Hillary Clinton will roll out her proposed changes to President Obama's Affordable Care Act on Tuesday, focusing lowering the cost of prescription drugs.

While the Democratic front-runner has long been a supporter of Obamacare, dating back to the 1990s, she has had her own, somewhat differing views on healthcare reform. Her plan, which she will introduce at a community forum in Iowa on Tuesday, will showcase some of those differences.

In the run-up to Clinton's healthcare event, her campaign has complained that "price gouging … in the specialty drug market is outrageous" and said that would soon lay out a plan to tackle it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drugs; hillary; obamacare; reforms
But Clinton still defends the law from Republican critics who would repeal it, saying healthcare reform "is going to be challenging and I don't think we should throw the baby out with the bath."

She remains exempt.

1 posted on 09/22/2015 1:40:29 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hillary is making a hard left turn and Obama is probably pushing her that way while dangling her political life in his hand. She has no principles. She would allow this to happen if it mean a shot at the presidency. I expect she’ll be co-opting some of Sanders and Warrens stuff.


2 posted on 09/22/2015 1:49:41 AM PDT by Fhios (Racial balkanization is just the .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“”her campaign has complained that “price gouging … in the specialty drug market is outrageous” and said that would soon lay out a plan to tackle it.””

With the unaffordable enormous deductibles and the enormous anual out-of-pocket costs and the extremely limited access to participating hospitals/doctors, she’s worried about the costs of the drugs? Well, I guess 1 out of 4 failures gives her something to talk about, right?!


3 posted on 09/22/2015 2:03:30 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
Sure! This way she gets to rail against the ultra-rich, big Pharma CEOs that are taking advantage of little grannies everywhere by price gouging instead of having to criticize the nuts & bolts of the cluster-f#@k better known as Obamacare (i.e., HillaryCare v2.0).

Hillary!'s for the "little people", dontcha know?!

4 posted on 09/22/2015 2:40:06 AM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hillarycare will do for our prescriptions what Obamacare did for our medical insurance. She’ll lower costs for the average family of four by another $2500, but if we like our current prescription coverage, we’ll be able to keep our current prescription coverage.


5 posted on 09/22/2015 2:45:05 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

When these pharma guys looked at the ACA as a boon, they forgot one thing, once the monster was born, there was no stopping it. Now they will see the downside of this law as it ruins the entire bio tech industry. Why spend billions on bringing a drug to market while not being able to make money from the endeavor. No one talks about the failures and how much money is blown away on them and on defending the usual host of liability suits that always follow a new drug introduction.

Trying to fix the ACA is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end.


6 posted on 09/22/2015 3:15:09 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Didn’t her inept efforts at managing national healthcare while “ First Lady” greatly increase the cost of vaccines? Her idea of managing healthcare is more and more government regulations


7 posted on 09/22/2015 3:48:08 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Now they will see the downside of this law as it ruins the entire bio tech industry.

...and probably not give a hoot. They got their bonuses.

8 posted on 09/22/2015 4:03:31 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

You are right. Country down the toilet. Crony socialists getting rich. They love it.


9 posted on 09/22/2015 4:04:28 AM PDT by samtheman (2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/(Cruz or Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

When you have over a 100 million dollars, you don’t even need health insurance.


10 posted on 09/22/2015 4:11:10 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Obama's Iran nuclear deal - The Devil is in the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

how many wonder drugs have the Libtard democrats CREATED..?? how many DOES HILLARY CLINTOON USE..??? her favorite comes in a bottle...almost forgot..

how are drug companies supposed to offset the R+D and FDA bureaucratic red tape process....and pay the costs for the drugs that dont make it to market.. why is it the ussa is the last to get the new drugs..?? i dont hear the irs complaining about the taxes they get off drug company profits..

H pushes the free shizzle button and the parasite lap dogs and libtard media come out howling....

maybe things might be different if the scumbags in congress didnt accept cash from the drug companies... huh???


11 posted on 09/22/2015 5:28:55 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This should finish the job of sending Big Pharma off shore.


12 posted on 09/22/2015 6:10:07 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (CA the sanctuary state for stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Now they will see the downside of this law as it ruins the entire bio tech industry. Why spend billions on bringing a drug to market while not being able to make money from the endeavor.

That is why I oppose Obamacare. Medical progress is great, but it will grind to a halt as the bloated FedGov determines the "acceptable" profit for innovation. Far too many brilliant researchers will choose another field, where they can profit from their discoveries. Socialism is both evil and harmful, and the "poor and minorities" they claim to care about will be the hardest hit as socialism creeps into more areas of our lives.

13 posted on 09/22/2015 6:20:15 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson