Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New plan: have the Democrats nominate Michael Bloomberg [Billionaire vs Billionaire]
Hotair ^ | 09/08/2015 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 09/08/2015 6:59:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

There seems to be a creeping pathos among the political commentariat these days as one poll after another indicates that no matter how many rotten eggs you throw at Donald Trump he somehow continues to turn them into delicious omelets which he serves up to the faithful. Over the course of the summer this was viewed as a primarily (pun intended) Republican problem. Democrat supporters were content to leave it to the GOP as to how they should clean up their own house and evict the unwelcome guest. But now even the most die-hard are forced to acknowledge that not only might Trump be the nominee, but he could actually beat Hillary Clinton. Michael Wolff, writing for USA Today, has clearly arrived at this juncture ahead of many of his peers and he’s got a suggestion for the DNC… dump Hillary and replace her with somebody who could fight The Donald on his own turf.

For the Democrats, this ought to signal a new sort of existential political imperative: If they don’t transform themselves, Donald Trump could actually become president. Even if that chance seems less than likely, it is a possibility that, one can only hope, has set off alarms…

If Trump successfully makes the race about worldly accomplishment, management prowess, personal authenticity, business smarts, lack of political pretense and rejection of the political class, then the Democrats have a more logical Trump slayer: Michael Bloomberg.

Right-winger and Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch, who has extraordinary political antennae and a curious antipathy to Donald Trump, trumpets Bloomberg — even presumably as a Democrat and even with his assortment of left-leaning positions — in yet another example of the year’s remarkable, if not bizarre, political fluidity.

It might take a true New York plutocrat to beat a populist one.

But wait, I can hear you saying. Bloomberg is a Republican, isn’t he? The Democrats won’t support him.

Not so fast there, slick. Bloomberg was a registered Democrat for his entire adult life until he ran for Mayor of the Big Apple in 2001 when he switched parties because there wasn’t an opening on his traditional team. By the time he got ready to run for this third term he jettisoned the GOP and ran as an independent. The guy treats political parties the same way most of us deal with our socks.(Sound familiar?)

Would the Democrats take him back after all this time, though? Let’s look at some of his positions on the issues of the day:

Pro-abortion – Check.
Pro-Gay Marriage – Check.
Pro-amnesty – Check.
Anti-Second Amendment – Yuge Check.

Granted, he’s got a history of being a “tough on crime” guy who supports the police and scraps with the current mayor about lax policing. He’s also a free trader and likes balanced budgets, so he’s not a perfect fit. But let’s just admit that Trump isn’t a perfect fit for conservatives either if you look at his history on the issues. And taking the argument from Wolff’s perspective, the Democrats shouldn’t be looking for a standard liberal to beat The Donald anyway… they need someone who can tap into some of those armies of unexpected, non-traditional voters that Trump is bringing out of the woodwork. So rather than seeing how properly he matches up with Elizabeth Warren, the DNC should be considering how well he matches up against this new threat.

One of Trump’s biggest calling cards is success and vast wealth, often citing how he’s built up his brand to be worth ten billion or so. That’s chump change to Bloomberg. At last count he’s worth more than $35B and is the 13th richest person in the world. He’s also not a “loser” (as Trump loves to say) in the electoral ring and he clearly has that inner desire for power. When he runs he wins. And he’s started rumors about a presidential bid a couple of times already.

Maybe Wolff isn’t so crazy after all. Bloomberg is, at least on paper, the Anti-Trump. And he’s not shy about raising his voice, either. Of course, many Democrats would be despondent about the race coming down to two “rich old white guys” again, but if the alternative is President Trump maybe they should think about it. If nothing else it would make for one hell of a general election battle.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; bloomberg; democrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2015 6:59:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bring it on, Bloomy Girl.


2 posted on 09/08/2015 7:04:28 AM PDT by samtheman (2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/(Cruz or Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'd put my chips on Uncle Joe Biden taking the leap before Bloomy would.
3 posted on 09/08/2015 7:04:57 AM PDT by JPG (What's the difference between the Rats and the GOPe? Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“Democrats would be despondent about the race coming down to two “rich old white guys....”

I've been saying it for some time now, The Old White Guy, he's the new N****r!

Dems have no compunction about crossing their oh so politically correct and sensitive lines of race gender and age, when it comes to the OLD WHITE GUY.

So put the phony sensitivity up yer where the sun don't shine. It has never been about empowering this or that ethnic, gender, race, etc., it has always been about taking down the white male heterosexual component of America.

4 posted on 09/08/2015 7:08:14 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wasn’t this a movie with Tina Turner and Mel Gibson?


5 posted on 09/08/2015 7:10:34 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t think hardly any of the people in New York would be happy about this, they couldn’t wait for his term to expire with his ‘gun control’ and his ‘soda containment’ they laughed at him..

He might be rich, but he’s a girly man and Trump would make him cry....


6 posted on 09/08/2015 7:16:35 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ("It's the hard working, tax paying citizens of the United States that are suffering..."Go TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Too right..and wouldn’t that be grand!


7 posted on 09/08/2015 7:23:21 AM PDT by JayGalt (I hate when people confuse aggression with strength of character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But, I thought a Bloomy was a Republican, err, Independent, err, DemoncRAT. For sure he’s anti 2nd Amendment! Gun totin’’, Bible reading folks will have nothing to do with him. He would be the Napoleonic complex on steroids!


8 posted on 09/08/2015 7:28:58 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

RE: But, I thought a Bloomy was a Republican, err, Independent, err, DemoncRAT.

He was ALL three, depending on which party will nominate him.


9 posted on 09/08/2015 7:30:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bloomberg would be the shortest President and the first from a Jewish family. Unlike Trump he did get very rich without inheriting millions or by betting the farm using high risk leverage to goose his returns.


10 posted on 09/08/2015 7:37:54 AM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

First Jewish major-party presidential nominee partly offsets old and white.


11 posted on 09/08/2015 7:39:16 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; hellinahandcart

Nurse Bloomberg for Prez???

Oy.


12 posted on 09/08/2015 8:00:56 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I called it three months ago.
Trump is pushing into Blue States and the RATS need to hold the Wall.


13 posted on 09/08/2015 8:04:10 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Hard to see how Bloomburg holds the wall. From a policy perspective he has more baggage than Hillary does.

His gun control efforts alone will throw a good number of purple/light blue states to the GOP. The Red states will become redder, meaning fewer resources will be needed to hold them.

The toss in the no-brainer ridicule attacks on things like his War on Big Gulps ...


14 posted on 09/08/2015 8:09:40 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sissy boy Bloomberg is the ideal candidate for the dems. He can campaign by telling us all how we will live our lives when he's in charge.

No sugary drinks!

Open your house to the homeless!

One flush per person per day!

Mandatory Solar Panels!

No Meat Days!

Turn In Your Guns!


15 posted on 09/08/2015 8:09:52 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Well as they tell 14 yr old girls in NYC: “here’s your plan B pill, just don’t wash it down with a large soda or smoke a cig after sex!


16 posted on 09/08/2015 8:11:25 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

It’s been 50 years since I was last in NYC. Can’t say I miss it.


17 posted on 09/08/2015 8:19:34 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So silly. Trump is popular. Bloomberg is not. Trump wants to secure the border. Bloomberg does not. Trump loves America. Does Bloomberg?


18 posted on 09/08/2015 8:24:51 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I have to go every once in a while. Hate it. That and DC. I feel like I need a shower the second I get home.


19 posted on 09/08/2015 8:26:09 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bloomers wasn’t that bad a mayor — although not the mayor Rudy was — but he’d be a disaster as president.

Stick to running your company and being the proud Global Corporate Sponsor of the Metropolitan Opera Live in HD.


20 posted on 09/08/2015 8:58:35 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson