Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraceG
Here's a Liberal Argument that needs to be refuted...

5 posted on 09/04/2015 7:10:00 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
Did the Quaker win an election? What is the state law? Is it an abomination to own a gun?
10 posted on 09/04/2015 7:13:41 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The thing is that it cant be refuted.

We would call for him to be removed from the post or we would be screaming about how he could have been elected in the first place.

I posed this question regarding gun laws that were struck down by SCOTUS, and so far no one has been able to answer.


11 posted on 09/04/2015 7:17:20 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
That's not a good example, and doesn't need to be refuted. The whole notion of a "gun permit" is completely incompatible with a free citizenry whose legal protections for self-defense are enshrined in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

A better example would be a radical Muslim who works in the Department of Motor Vehicle and refuses to grant driver's licenses to women based on some religious objection to women driving.

14 posted on 09/04/2015 7:23:31 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

easily refuted, one is a constitutionally protected RIGHT, the other is NOT- Nowhere in our constitution is homosexual marriage a protected right- however, gun ownership IS a constitutionally protected right, and it is specifically mentioned in the constitution- and it IS a NATURAL RIGHT and a NATURAL GOD GIVEN RIGHT for a man to be able to protect himself and his family- it is NOT a natural right for two men or two women to pleasure each other under the guise of marriage


23 posted on 09/04/2015 2:56:33 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I saw someone post @ Facebook that Ms. Davis has been married and divorced 3x, and that doesn’t fit the liberals’ version of a “Christian” woman. Not that they would have a problem with her alleged multiple divorces if she weren’t standing up for ‘traditional marriage.’


27 posted on 09/04/2015 4:24:42 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson