Skip to comments.Bishop E.W. Jackson: Planned Parenthood Founder Was a White Supremacist
Posted on 08/29/2015 5:56:43 PM PDT by xzins
At a press conference outside the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday, Bishop E.W. Jackson said that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was a white supremacist and to honor her is to be complicit in her evil and her racism.
The press conference brought together a group of black pastors and pro-life leaders who are demanding that the portrait gallery, which is a part of the federally funded Smithsonian Institution, remove a bust of Margaret Sanger.
The bust is featured in the gallerys The Struggle for Justice exhibit, which focuses on historical equal rights achievements in America. Depictions of King and Parks are featured in the exhibit nearby Sangers bust.
The woman was a racist, she was a genocidal figure in America and in human history and to honor her is to be complicit in her evil and her racism, Jackson said.
Thats right, if you are honoring Margaret Sanger you are joining together with her in her racist ideology, he said.
So she may have never used the term--that is Margaret Sanger--but she was clearly a white supremacist, he said. That term is used today as a political weapon often without any facts to back it up. Weve got facts to back up that Margaret Sanger was a white supremacist.
Planned Parenthood is nothing more than a euphemism for Planned Death for the people that Margaret Sanger thought should not exist, Jackson said.
Jackson is the president of STAND (Staying True to Americas National Destiny). On Thursday, after the press conference, he delivered a petition signed by 14,000 calling for the Smithsonian to remove Sangers bust.
Planned Parenthood is designed to eliminate minority races, and the democrats are their main supporters.
If every pastor in every pulpit in every “black” Church across the nation drove these points home....a few people would back away form the democrat party....how few...I dont know.
Yes, one of the biggest tragedies and scams the 'rats have pulled on the Black community; if only that community would wise up.
The 'rats don't like Blacks, they only like their votes.
But if she only advocated killing white babies you might not say a peep eh Jackson?
Ok Bishop, are you gonna expose the black congressional caucus and NAACP giving money to PP?
Nope. He’s been the leader in this. So has Star Parker...a republican.
With the hitler stash she really looks like hillary.
Post that at every bus and train stop in every urban neighborhood.
Prescott Bush had similar philosophy and was founding treasurer.
One interest fact about Sanger is that she was vehemently against abortion.
Sanger’s racism was central to her belief system. Reducing the number of people she considered inferior fit her right in with the nazis.
God bless this man for telling the truth about this evil, evil woman.
PS to my own post, when you talk about people who’ve “gotten a pass” from the media this creature should be at the top of the list.
I once tried to tell a democrat this, his response was laughter and ridicule
Protesting Sanger with regard to eugenics is fine, but be prepared to criticize everyone else who supported it, too.
The number of people and groups who supported eugenics back in the day might surprise you. Thirty states had pro-eugenics laws on the books.
Winston Churchill & Theodore Roosevelt were both supporters.
WEB Du Bois, co-founder of the NAACP and the NAACP both supported eugenics, too.
It’s not about supporting eugenics, it’s the reasons behind it.
Eugenics just argues that desirable traits can be bred into humans and undesirable traits can be bred out of them. It’s not controversial, we do it with other species all the time and when the theory was first proposed it made a lot of sense to a lot of people.
Of course the morality behind such schemes was a side issue then and for a lot of people, it just gave a thinly veiled excuse of support to their preexisting white supremacist views.
Now we know that while it may be beneficial if people with certain genetic diseases don’t reproduce, identifying and educating such people so that they can make the best reproductive decisions for themselves is best.
And no I’m not talking about abortion. But if a new couple finds out before pregnancy that they both carry recessive genes for some terrible condition, they might make the decision to adopt instead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.