Posted on 08/15/2015 5:22:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
On August 5, an Environmental Restoration company crew, supervised by US Environmental Protection Agency officials, used a backhoe to dig away tons of rock and debris that were blocking the entrance portal of Colorado’s Gold King Mine, which had been largely abandoned since 1923. Water had been seeping into the mine and out of its portal for decades, and the officials knew (or should have known) the water was acidic (pH 4.0-4.5), backed up far into the mine, and laced with heavy metals.
But they kept digging – until the greatly weakened dam burst open, unleashing a 3-million-gallon (or more) toxic flood that soon contaminated the Animas and San Juan Rivers, all the way to Lake Powell in Utah. To compound the disaster, EPA then waited an entire day before notifying downstream mayors, health officials, families, farmers, ranchers, fishermen and kayakers that the water they were drinking, using for crops or livestock or paddling in was contaminated by lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic.
Three million gallons of turmeric-orange poisonous water and sludge is enough to fill a pool the size of a football field (360x160 feet) seven feet deep. Backed up hundreds of feet above the portal into mine adits, stopes, rooms and other passageways that begin at 11,458 feet above sea level, the flash-flooding water had enough power to rip out a road and propel its toxic muck hundreds of miles downstream. (You can review EPA’s incompetence and gross negligence in these project photos and post-disaster images.)
Anyone who follows mining, oil spill and power plant accidents knows the EPA, Obama White House and Big Green environmentalist rhetoric: There is no safe threshold for chemicals. They are toxic and carcinogenic at parts per billion. The water will be unsafe for years or even decades. Wildlife will die. Corporate polluters are criminals and must pay major fines. We will keep our boots on their necks.
This time the White House was silent, and Democrats and eco-activists rushed to defend EPA and shift the blame to mining and mining companies. EPA officials made statements they would never use if a private company had caused the blowout. EPA had simply “miscalculated” how much water had backed up. It was just trying to stick a pipe into the top of the mine to safely pump liquid out for treatment. We were “very careful.” Contaminants “are flowing too fast to be an immediate health threat.” The river is already “restoring itself,” EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy insisted.
The evidence strongly suggests that EPA never studied or calculated anything, had no operations plan vetted and approved by state officials or mining experts, was not trying to install a pipe – and was grossly careless and negligent. Toxic sludge was carried and deposited along hundreds of miles, contaminating water and riverbeds, where it will be stirred up for years during every heavy rainfall and snowmelt.
Mining engineers told me the prudent approach would have been to push or drill a 4-inch pipe through the rubble into the mine, to determine the water pressure, toxicity and extent of water backup in the mine – and then build a strong cofferdam below the portal – before proceeding. Simply removing the debris was stupid, dangerous and negligent, they said. It will take years now to correct the damage and assess costs.
A week after the great flood, EPA finally built a series of retention ponds to contain and filter out heavy metals and chemicals. But the August 5 surge and continuing outflow are still contaminating Colorado, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico rivers, in arid regions where water is scarce and precious. The Navajo Tribal Unity Authority says meeting EPA standards for clean drinking water could double the tribe’s costs for building a new treatment plant and cost millions more in testing and operating expenses.
EPA says it will pay for testing, property damage, human injuries and hauling safe drinking water. But will it pay to truck in safe water for livestock and irrigation, and pay for crops and livestock lost because there is no water in the meantime, and millions in lost incomes for outfitters and hotel operators during what would have been their peak tourist seasons? Exxon paid such costs after the Valdez spill in Alaska; BP did likewise after its Macondo spill in the Gulf of Mexico; so have other companies.
Shouldn’t EPA do likewise, instead of asserting “sovereign immunity” despite its gross negligence? Shouldn’t it cover these costs out of the millions of dollars it uses for employee bonuses and to pay environmental activists and public relations firms to promote its image and agenda – instead of sticking taxpayers with the tab via special appropriations? Will EPA reimburse state and local governments and private charities for assistance they have already rendered? Will it fire the irresponsible officials, or at least demote and discipline them? Will Environmental Restoration pay its fair share?
Under standards that EPA and environmentalists apply to the private sector, Gold King was a disaster. However, the accident could also be an impetus for reflection and responsible regulatory reform.
Anti-mining pressure groups and factions within EPA will use this accident to press for new layers of mining rules, bonds, payments and liabilities. They are unnecessary – and will only restrict the jobs, expertise and revenues needed to ensure that exploration, mining, reclamation and repair of abandoned (orphan) mines are done properly. Modern mining, processing and pollution prevention methods are vastly superior to those employed even 50 years ago, and do not cause the exaggerated impacts alleged by Earthwatch and others. Moreover, the metals and minerals are essential for the wondrous technologies and living standards, the health, housing, transportation and recreational pursuits, that we enjoy today.
The Gold King blowout was predictable and preventable. The mine was leaking slightly polluted water, but the problem was not serious and was being addressed, and the former mining town of Silverton, CO had repeatedly asked EPA not to intervene or make Gold King a Superfund site. Mining engineers and other experts were available, and some had offered their insights and expertise. EPA ignored them.
EPA – and all government agencies – should end their We-know-best and We-know-what-we’re-doing attitudes … and seek outside advice from real experts in the trenches. They should also develop careful operating plans, assess worst-case scenarios, and take steps to ensure that the worst doesn’t happen. Sometimes they just need to do nothing, get out of the way, and let the private sector handle problems.
EPA’s new view that these pollutants are not as toxic as previously claimed – and that nature can and does clean things up – is refreshing, even if self-serving. (My use of “toxic” in this article reflects currently prevailing agency, activist and public health industry attitudes and safety standards.) The agency should also take another look at its thresholds for bio-accumulation of toxics in the tissues of fish and shellfish, up the food chain to eagles or humans that eat the stream and bottom dwellers.
Standards for maximum contaminant levels and maximum safe exposures are often absurdly low, and the concept of “linear no threshold” (that there is no safe exposure or blood level for lead, cadmium, arsenic and other metals) is outdated and wrong, Dr. Edward Calabrese and other experts argue.
Not only are pollution, exposure and blood levels often safe at significantly higher levels than regulations currently allow. Low levels of exposure to radiation and many chemicals can actually provide protection from cancer, disease and other pollutants. While this concept of hormesis is generally ignored by current regulations, we know that a little alcohol improves heart functions, whereas a lot causes multiple problems; an 80 mg aspirin can prevent strokes, but a bottleful can kill; and many vaccinations inject disease strains that cause a person’s immune system to produce antibodies and prevent the disease.
The Obama EPA is already using WOTUS rules on water and a Clean Power Plan on electricity generation and climate change to control virtually everything we make, grow and do. Congressional committees, presidential candidates, businesses and citizens need to get involved, debate these issues, ask tough questions, and demand that appropriate reforms be implemented. Our courts and Congress must not allow another collusive sue-and-settle lawsuit – or a new regime of government controls and mine closures that would drive yet another nail into the coffin of western state and local economies.
Gold King presents a teachable moment. Let’s make sure we learn the correct lessons.
I’m from the government and I’m here to help.
My friend or foe axiom:
If to you, the slightest mistake someone makes is just more proof they are terrible and should be eliminated, even if they are otherwise what most people would call “good”, you are their foe.
If to you the slightest good deed by a person makes them a wonderful human being, even if most people would call them a terrible person (e.g. rapist, murderer, robber, etc.), you are friend. Think mother at a sentencing hearing for her son for murder “But my Lamar is a GOOD Boy!” Uh, no he isn’t.
The EPA is the leftists’ friend. They can do no wrong.
Given the Editorial in the Silverton paper ONE WEEK PRIOR, I’d say it was a predictable conspiracy to set up a Superfund site, steal land, and limit development.
EPA had been trying to get their nose under the tent for over a year to get superfund projects going in the area. A retires Geologists predicted this flood would happen in 7 to 120 days just from watching the work crew.
Now Sierra club can sue EPA and win millions of tax dollars to build up their war chest and the EPA can step in and make new rules and regulations to take over the area “to prevent environmental disasters form happening again”.
“Given the Editorial in the Silverton paper ONE WEEK PRIOR, I’d say it was a predictable conspiracy to set up a Superfund site, steal land, and limit development.”
I think you are right. Any idiot could have predicted what happened. I don’t think the people opening the mine could have been that stupid. On top of that the EPA seems to be deflecting financial responsibility. It looks more criminal than like an accident.
What a great way to get rid of US farming and US livestock. They are destroying farmland in California, diverting water for stupid little fish, and now this. Is the Mississippi River going to be next?
The EPA has to be terminated before they terminate us.
Instead they poisoned an entire river system and now they can deem it “off limits” for 200 years...
Gov. Martinez was on with Greta last night. She’s pretty livid. EPA did not notify them when the breach happened, NM found out from the Ute Nation who lives along the river. If EPA had notified when it occurred, they would have had about 24 hours to block off irrigation ditches, etc. and take other steps that might have reduced the damage. McCarthy did not talk to Martinez until SEVEN days after this happened and had no answers .... what happened, why it happened, or what was going to be done about it. Utter incompetence. Greta ran out of time .... too bad, because Martinez had more to say. McCarthy has been accused of lying to Congress ... they need to impeach her, same as Koskinen (but of course, from the Congress, there will be “crickets”). BTW, check out the EPA LGBT page that I just happened to stumble across .... where’s their ‘straight’ page???? /SARC
http://www2.epa.gov/careers/profiles-members-epas-lgbt-community
For the life of me, I still cannot understand why these States have not filed CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE charges against the EPA Administrators for this Blatant Criminal Act!, Arrest,Put on Trial, CONVICT, Sentence to LIFE in PRISON, and FORCE OBAMA to issue Pardons for DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT!
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
I hope President Cruz, during his first month in office, disband the EPA and use the savings to compensate those harmed by this event.
Why are you stuttering?
The EPA will not be allowed on my property to inspect my irrigation ponds, since they say they have total control of all water on my property, including my springs for drinking water.
Hope it does not end in me dead or in jail or losing everything we have ever worked for, when they try.
So sorry for the multiple posts. Still learning to post with my phone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.