Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Iowa is not a winner take all state. Look who will be sharing the delegates and how they might come together as a final team


11 posted on 08/12/2015 2:42:39 PM PDT by hoosiermama (psalm 150;3 Praise him with the sound of the TRUMPet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosiermama

The GOP is not allowing states to be winner-take-all until about a third of the way through the primaries. They let almost all the blue states vote later and be winner-take-all, a system that could badly hurt conservative candidates. They’ll be losing delegates in early, southern, conservative states to proportional allotment, while they’ll get no delegates from later blue states even if they come in 2nd place.


14 posted on 08/12/2015 2:45:14 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: hoosiermama

Iowa is not a winner take all state. Look who will be sharing the delegates and how they might come together as a final team


Iowa matters much more than its delegate count. It’s a huge first victory for the winner.


59 posted on 08/12/2015 4:53:05 PM PDT by samtheman (Trump/Cruz '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson