Posted on 08/06/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by markomalley
In short, to semi-polish the Gang of 8 turd.
Regardless of the spin (the purported "why"), this is what he did.
Cruz has been wobbly on immigration. Trump says he will build the wall and send illegal back to their home country and then pick and choice whom to allow back in. That works for me.
What does the 17th Amendment mean to you?
Trump or Cruz?
You posted a selfie? How quaint.
You’ve got a lot of nerve, black kettle. Cruzbots have been trolling Trump threads for days. Maybe longer than that.
There is no ‘’isolationist’’ running. So it is impossible for me- or anyone else, to support an ‘’isolationist’’ candidate.
It seems that the ‘’isolationist’’ LIE is just the latest tactic in the slur Donald Trump campaign.
Ted Cruz wants to increase H1Bs FIVEFOLD. How many working Americans will that hurt? Max: People. Need. Jobs. They do not need potential jobs given away to Foreign Workers so some mega corporation or the bankers can increase their already ridiculous profits. This is even worse than border jumpers. These are higher paying jobs than non skilled workers can get.
I don’t *care* why Ted Cruz brought that bill. It’s the wrong thing to do under or present circumstances or under the very best of circumstances. It hurts American workers & that hurts the American economy.
This will not help America recover. All it will do is stuff the pockets of Wall Street EVEN MORE.
The problem is that Cruz isn’t working for the American people. He’s working for his donors. Screw Main Street. Heh heh heh.
The ‘’most conservative candidate’’ according to SOCIAL conservatives. Ted Cruz’ position isn’t fiscally conservative at all. How is putting Americans out of work fiscally conservative? Do you not realize that it’s more than just the worker who is harmed? Don’t get into this with me because I will go into detail if that’s what you want.
Oh, there’s more than H1Bs. Shall I go on? Not that I enjoy listening to hysterical babbling. (wth do Halliburton/ Bush/ Cheney have to do with anything? Get a grip)
geez, man. Y’all are getting as crazy as Paultards. You’re doing EXACTLY the same thing the OFAs are doing. It doesn’t ‘’convince’’ anyone of anything besides how much they hate it.
Article V
Oh I’m sure I will just bend over backwards to do so. Get over yourself. My teachers thought I was KarL- a boy’s name, the first day of school for 12 years & some of them, on any given day in college. I think your self esteem will survive.
Ted Cruz has spent a lifetime fighting to defend the Constitution our nations founding document and the supreme law of the land which was crafted by our founding fathers to act as chains to bind the mischief of government and to protect the liberties endowed to us by our Creator.
Religious Liberty
Second Amendment
U.S. Sovereignty
Government Overreach
IMHO, the candidate who will govern closest to the Constitution is Ted Cruz. That’s all I need to know.
A safer, stronger America safeguards freedom at home and across the globe. Thats why Ted Cruz has fought tirelessly to defend our nations servicemen and women, to restore Americas leadership in the world, and to secure our border and streamline our legal immigration system.
Who cares, we a being invaded, we are being over run and you want some kind of purity test? Tens of thousand of Americans are being raped, murdered, robbed and let go from work. Screw the purity test.
The American Dream the idea that anyone, through hard work and determination, can achieve anything is under assault like never before. Obamacare, an overreaching federal government, and out of control spending threaten the ability of small businesses and entrepreneurs to create jobs and innovate. This has to stop and Ted Cruz has led the way to bring back jobs, growth, and opportunity to America.
Senator Cruz would not and will not give President Obama one more inch of unrestricted power.
There have been a lot of questions and concerns about the ongoing Pacific trade negotiations. Many of those concerns, fueled by the media, stem from confusion about Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Lets unpack the issues one by one.
What are TPA and TPP?
TPA stands for Trade Promotion Authority, also known as fast track. TPA is a process by which trade agreements are approved by Congress. Through TPA, Congress sets out up-front objectives for the Executive branch to achieve in free trade negotiations; in exchange for following those objectives, Congress agrees to hold an up-or-down vote on trade agreements without amendments. For the past 80 years, it has proven virtually impossible to negotiate free-trade agreements without the fast-track process.
TPP stands for Trans-Pacific Partnership. TPP is a specific trade agreement currently being negotiated by the United States and 11 other countries, including Canada, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. China is not a negotiating partner. There is no final language on TPP because negotiations are still ongoing and have been since late 2009. Neither the Senate nor the House has voted yet on the TPP. There will be no vote on TPP until the negotiations are over and the final agreement is sent to Congress.
Some Key Facts:
Does TPA give up the Senates treaty power?
No. Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law: (1) through a treaty, ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, or (2) through legislation passed by a majority of both Houses of Congress. TPA employs the second constitutional path, as trade bills always have done. It has long been recognized that the Constitutions Origination Clause applies to trade bills, requiring the House of Representatives involvement.
Does the United States give up Sovereignty by entering into TPP?
No. Nothing in the agreement forces Congress to change any law. TPA explicitly provides that nothing in any trade agreement can change U.S. law. Congress is the only entity that can make U.S. law, and Congress is the only entity that can change U.S. law. Nothing about TPP or TPA could change that.
Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPP?
Senator Cruz has not taken a position either in favor or against TPP. He will wait until the agreement is finalized and he has a chance to study it carefully to ensure that the agreement will open more markets to American-made products, create jobs, and grow our economy. Senator Cruz has dedicated his professional career to defending U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution. He will not support any trade agreement that would diminish or undermine either.
Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPA?
Yes. Senator Cruz voted in favor of TPA earlier this year because it breaks the logjam that is preventing the U.S. from entering into trade deals that are good for American workers, American businesses, and our economy. Ronald Reagan emphatically supported free trade, and Senator Cruz does as well. He ran for Senate promising to support free trade, and he is honoring that commitment to the voters.
Free trade helps American farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers; indeed, one in five American jobs depends on trade, in Texas alone 3 million jobs depend on trade. When we open up foreign markets, we create American jobs.
TPA also strengthens Congress hand in trade negotiations, and provides transparency by making the agreement (including TPP) public for at least 60 days before the Congress can act on any final agreement. Without TPA, there is no such transparency, and the Congress role in trade agreements is weaker.
Is TPA Constitutional?
TPA and similar trade authority has been upheld by the Supreme Court as constitutional for more than 100 years.
Does TPA give the President more authority?
No. TPA ensures that Congress has the ability to set the objectives up-front for free trade agreements.
Trade Promotion Authority has been used to reduce trade barriers since FDR. When Harry Reid took over the Senate, he killed it. History demonstrates that it is almost impossible to negotiate a free-trade agreement without TPA. Right now without TPA, America is unable to negotiate free-trade agreements, putting the United States at a disadvantage to China, which is taking the lead world-wide. It is not in Americas interests to have China writing the rules of international trade.
Moreover, Obama is going to be president for just 18 more months. TPA is six-year legislation. If we want the next president (hopefully a Republican) to be able to negotiate free-trade agreements to restart our economy and create jobs here at home then we must reinstate TPA. With a Republican president in office, Senate Democrats would almost certainly vote party-line to block TPA, so now is the only realistic chance.
How can Senator Cruz trust Obama?
He doesnt. Not at all. No part of Senator Cruzs support for TPA was based on trusting Obama. However, under TPA, every trade deal is still subject to approval by Congress. If the Obama Administration tries to do something terrible in a trade agreement, Congress can vote it down. And most congressional Democrats will always vote nobecause union bosses oppose free trade, so do most Democratswhich means a handful of conservative congressional Republicans have the votes to kill any bad deal. Thats a serious check on presidential power.
Isnt TPP a living agreement?
That particular phrasea foolish and misleading way to put itis found in the summary portion of one particular section of the draft agreement. That section allows member nations to amend the agreement in the future, expressly subject to the approval of their governments. Thus, if some amendment were proposed in the future, Congress would have to approve it before it went into effect.
But isnt TPA a secret agreement?
No, it is not. The full text of TPA (fast track) is public. What the Senate just voted for was TPA, not TPP.
Right now, the text of TPP is classified. That is a mistake. Senator Cruz has vigorously called on the Obama administration to make the full text of TPP open to the public immediately. The text being hidden naturally only fuels concerns about what might be in it. Senator Cruz has read the current draft of TPP, and it should be made public now.
Critically, under TPA, TPP cannot be voted on until after the text has been public for 60 days. Therefore, everyone will be able to read it long before it comes up for a vote.
Couldnt Obama use a trade agreement to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants?
No. There is one section of TPP that concerns immigration, but it affects only foreign nationsthe United States has explicitly declined to sign on to that section.
Moreover, Senator Cruz introduced a TPA amendment to expressly prohibit any trade deal from attempting to alter our immigration laws.
Two Republican Senators (Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul) blocked the Senates consideration of that amendment, but the House of Representatives has agreed to include that language in the final text of the trade legislation. Thus, assuming the House honors that public commitment, federal law will explicitly prohibit any trade deal from impacting immigration.
And, regardless, no trade agreement can change U.S. law; only Congress can change U.S. law.
I hope you mean Ted Roosevelt.
FDR was no friend to the Republic.
“Trump or Cruz throw their support to one another in order to deny Bush or Kasick the nomination.”
I am verrry wary of Trump. But right now he is serving the very useful purpose of breaking Jeb Bush’s kneecaps.
The absolute last chance.
We (America) blew it in 2008/2012, and those we sent to Congress blew it by choosing Boehner and McConnell to lead them.
God has already been overly generous. Though He is long suffering, He will not wait forever.
He made a mighty nation of the Jews, but when they displeased him and turned their back on Him, as we as a nation have done, He allowed them to be laid low and their most holy places to be taken by nonbelievers.
And they were His *chosen* people.
2 Chr. 7:14
:-) Well played, Isara. It’s a moving dog whistle. Let me ask you, how many of those things provided a job & improved the life of a returning veteran & their loved ones for real?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.