Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz: 'Now or never' to save America
WND ^ | 8/5/15 | Garth Kant

Posted on 08/06/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: MaxMax
"In 2013, Sen. Cruz proposed amendments to the “Gang of 8” bill that would strengthen border security, expand green card opportunities, increase high-skilled “H1B” visas, prevent illegal aliens from receiving welfare benefits, and enforce the rule of law." - Ted Cruz's website

In short, to semi-polish the Gang of 8 turd.

Regardless of the spin (the purported "why"), this is what he did.



61 posted on 08/06/2015 6:59:21 AM PDT by peyton randolph (I am not a number. I am a free man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
No but he gets things done and right now this country needs to get immigration under control. Nothing else matters. If the left can get 30-60 million new Marxist voters via chain immigration, the country and it's constitution are finished. "They" have been saying 11 million for 20 years, the real number is much higher. The only issue that matter this election is immigration.

Cruz has been wobbly on immigration. Trump says he will build the wall and send illegal back to their home country and then pick and choice whom to allow back in. That works for me.

62 posted on 08/06/2015 7:00:41 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Who would be more informed to answer the question:

What does the 17th Amendment mean to you?

Trump or Cruz?

63 posted on 08/06/2015 7:01:16 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

64 posted on 08/06/2015 7:03:40 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

You posted a selfie? How quaint.


65 posted on 08/06/2015 7:04:07 AM PDT by peyton randolph (I am not a number. I am a free man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

You’ve got a lot of nerve, black kettle. Cruzbots have been trolling Trump threads for days. Maybe longer than that.

There is no ‘’isolationist’’ running. So it is impossible for me- or anyone else, to support an ‘’isolationist’’ candidate.

It seems that the ‘’isolationist’’ LIE is just the latest tactic in the slur Donald Trump campaign.

Ted Cruz wants to increase H1Bs FIVEFOLD. How many working Americans will that hurt? Max: People. Need. Jobs. They do not need potential jobs given away to Foreign Workers so some mega corporation or the bankers can increase their already ridiculous profits. This is even worse than border jumpers. These are higher paying jobs than non skilled workers can get.

I don’t *care* why Ted Cruz brought that bill. It’s the wrong thing to do under or present circumstances or under the very best of circumstances. It hurts American workers & that hurts the American economy.
This will not help America recover. All it will do is stuff the pockets of Wall Street EVEN MORE.

The problem is that Cruz isn’t working for the American people. He’s working for his donors. Screw Main Street. Heh heh heh.

The ‘’most conservative candidate’’ according to SOCIAL conservatives. Ted Cruz’ position isn’t fiscally conservative at all. How is putting Americans out of work fiscally conservative? Do you not realize that it’s more than just the worker who is harmed? Don’t get into this with me because I will go into detail if that’s what you want.

Oh, there’s more than H1Bs. Shall I go on? Not that I enjoy listening to hysterical babbling. (wth do Halliburton/ Bush/ Cheney have to do with anything? Get a grip)

geez, man. Y’all are getting as crazy as Paultards. You’re doing EXACTLY the same thing the OFAs are doing. It doesn’t ‘’convince’’ anyone of anything besides how much they hate it.


66 posted on 08/06/2015 7:04:37 AM PDT by KGeorge (Hell no. We ain't forgettin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Article V


67 posted on 08/06/2015 7:06:18 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Oh I’m sure I will just bend over backwards to do so. Get over yourself. My teachers thought I was KarL- a boy’s name, the first day of school for 12 years & some of them, on any given day in college. I think your self esteem will survive.


68 posted on 08/06/2015 7:08:32 AM PDT by KGeorge (Hell no. We ain't forgettin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Our Standard: The Constitution

Ted Cruz has spent a lifetime fighting to defend the Constitution — our nation’s founding document and the supreme law of the land — which was crafted by our founding fathers to act as chains to bind the mischief of government and to protect the liberties endowed to us by our Creator.

Religious Liberty

Second Amendment

U.S. Sovereignty

Government Overreach

 

More Proven Records:


69 posted on 08/06/2015 7:11:14 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

IMHO, the candidate who will govern closest to the Constitution is Ted Cruz. That’s all I need to know.


70 posted on 08/06/2015 7:15:02 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge

Stronger, Safer America

army-2015

A safer, stronger America safeguards freedom at home and across the globe. That’s why Ted Cruz has fought tirelessly to defend our nation’s servicemen and women, to restore America’s leadership in the world, and to secure our border and streamline our legal immigration system.


71 posted on 08/06/2015 7:19:41 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Who cares, we a being invaded, we are being over run and you want some kind of purity test? Tens of thousand of Americans are being raped, murdered, robbed and let go from work. Screw the purity test.


72 posted on 08/06/2015 7:20:20 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Jobs & Opportunity

landing_bg3

The American Dream — the idea that anyone, through hard work and determination, can achieve anything — is under assault like never before. Obamacare, an overreaching federal government, and out of control spending threaten the ability of small businesses and entrepreneurs to create jobs and innovate. This has to stop and Ted Cruz has led the way to bring back jobs, growth, and opportunity to America.


73 posted on 08/06/2015 7:21:57 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph; KGeorge
Senator Cruz entirely understands the widespread suspicion of the President. Nobody has been more vocal in pointing out the President’s lawlessness or more passionate about fighting his usurpation of congressional authority.

Senator Cruz would not and will not give President Obama one more inch of unrestricted power.

There have been a lot of questions and concerns about the ongoing Pacific trade negotiations. Many of those concerns, fueled by the media, stem from confusion about Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Let’s unpack the issues one by one.

What are TPA and TPP?
TPA stands for Trade Promotion Authority, also known as “fast track”. TPA is a process by which trade agreements are approved by Congress. Through TPA, Congress sets out up-front objectives for the Executive branch to achieve in free trade negotiations; in exchange for following those objectives, Congress agrees to hold an up-or-down vote on trade agreements without amendments. For the past 80 years, it has proven virtually impossible to negotiate free-trade agreements without the fast-track process.

TPP stands for Trans-Pacific Partnership. TPP is a specific trade agreement currently being negotiated by the United States and 11 other countries, including Canada, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. China is not a negotiating partner. There is no final language on TPP because negotiations are still ongoing and have been since late 2009. Neither the Senate nor the House has voted yet on the TPP. There will be no vote on TPP until the negotiations are over and the final agreement is sent to Congress.

Some Key Facts:

Does TPA give up the Senate’s treaty power?
No. Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law: (1) through a treaty, ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, or (2) through legislation passed by a majority of both Houses of Congress. TPA employs the second constitutional path, as trade bills always have done. It has long been recognized that the Constitution’s Origination Clause applies to trade bills, requiring the House of Representatives’ involvement.

Does the United States give up Sovereignty by entering into TPP?
No. Nothing in the agreement forces Congress to change any law. TPA explicitly provides that nothing in any trade agreement can change U.S. law. Congress is the only entity that can make U.S. law, and Congress is the only entity that can change U.S. law. Nothing about TPP or TPA could change that.

Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPP?
Senator Cruz has not taken a position either in favor or against TPP. He will wait until the agreement is finalized and he has a chance to study it carefully to ensure that the agreement will open more markets to American-made products, create jobs, and grow our economy. Senator Cruz has dedicated his professional career to defending U.S. sovereignty and the U.S. Constitution. He will not support any trade agreement that would diminish or undermine either.

Does Senator Ted Cruz support TPA?
Yes. Senator Cruz voted in favor of TPA earlier this year because it breaks the logjam that is preventing the U.S. from entering into trade deals that are good for American workers, American businesses, and our economy. Ronald Reagan emphatically supported free trade, and Senator Cruz does as well. He ran for Senate promising to support free trade, and he is honoring that commitment to the voters.

Free trade helps American farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers; indeed, one in five American jobs depends on trade, in Texas alone 3 million jobs depend on trade. When we open up foreign markets, we create American jobs.

TPA also strengthens Congress’ hand in trade negotiations, and provides transparency by making the agreement (including TPP) public for at least 60 days before the Congress can act on any final agreement. Without TPA, there is no such transparency, and the Congress’ role in trade agreements is weaker.

Is TPA Constitutional?
TPA and similar trade authority has been upheld by the Supreme Court as constitutional for more than 100 years.

Does TPA give the President more authority?
No. TPA ensures that Congress has the ability to set the objectives up-front for free trade agreements.

Trade Promotion Authority has been used to reduce trade barriers since FDR. When Harry Reid took over the Senate, he killed it. History demonstrates that it is almost impossible to negotiate a free-trade agreement without TPA. Right now without TPA, America is unable to negotiate free-trade agreements, putting the United States at a disadvantage to China, which is taking the lead world-wide. It is not in America’s interests to have China writing the rules of international trade.

Moreover, Obama is going to be president for just 18 more months. TPA is six-year legislation. If we want the next president (hopefully a Republican) to be able to negotiate free-trade agreements to restart our economy and create jobs here at home then we must reinstate TPA. With a Republican president in office, Senate Democrats would almost certainly vote party-line to block TPA, so now is the only realistic chance.

How can Senator Cruz trust Obama?
He doesn’t. Not at all. No part of Senator Cruz’s support for TPA was based on trusting Obama. However, under TPA, every trade deal is still subject to approval by Congress. If the Obama Administration tries to do something terrible in a trade agreement, Congress can vote it down. And most congressional Democrats will always vote no—because union bosses oppose free trade, so do most Democrats—which means a handful of conservative congressional Republicans have the votes to kill any bad deal. That’s a serious check on presidential power.

Isn’t TPP a “living agreement”?
That particular phrase—a foolish and misleading way to put it—is found in the “summary” portion of one particular section of the draft agreement. That section allows member nations to amend the agreement in the future, expressly subject to the approval of their governments. Thus, if some amendment were proposed in the future, Congress would have to approve it before it went into effect.

But isn’t TPA a secret agreement?
No, it is not. The full text of TPA (fast track) is public. What the Senate just voted for was TPA, not TPP.

Right now, the text of TPP is classified. That is a mistake. Senator Cruz has vigorously called on the Obama administration to make the full text of TPP open to the public immediately. The text being hidden naturally only fuels concerns about what might be in it. Senator Cruz has read the current draft of TPP, and it should be made public now.

Critically, under TPA, TPP cannot be voted on until after the text has been public for 60 days. Therefore, everyone will be able to read it long before it comes up for a vote.

Couldn’t Obama use a trade agreement to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants?
No. There is one section of TPP that concerns immigration, but it affects only foreign nations—the United States has explicitly declined to sign on to that section.

Moreover, Senator Cruz introduced a TPA amendment to expressly prohibit any trade deal from attempting to alter our immigration laws.

Two Republican Senators (Lindsey Graham and Rand Paul) blocked the Senate’s consideration of that amendment, but the House of Representatives has agreed to include that language in the final text of the trade legislation. Thus, assuming the House honors that public commitment, federal law will explicitly prohibit any trade deal from impacting immigration.

And, regardless, no trade agreement can change U.S. law; only Congress can change U.S. law.

74 posted on 08/06/2015 7:32:52 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

75 posted on 08/06/2015 7:49:57 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I hope you mean Ted Roosevelt.
FDR was no friend to the Republic.


76 posted on 08/06/2015 8:00:28 AM PDT by oldvirginian (TED CRUZ, because the Constitution matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

“Trump or Cruz throw their support to one another in order to deny Bush or Kasick the nomination.”

I am verrry wary of Trump. But right now he is serving the very useful purpose of breaking Jeb Bush’s kneecaps.


77 posted on 08/06/2015 8:10:14 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The absolute last chance.

We (America) blew it in 2008/2012, and those we sent to Congress blew it by choosing Boehner and McConnell to lead them.

God has already been overly generous. Though He is long suffering, He will not wait forever.

He made a mighty nation of the Jews, but when they displeased him and turned their back on Him, as we as a nation have done, He allowed them to be laid low and their most holy places to be taken by nonbelievers.
And they were His *chosen* people.


78 posted on 08/06/2015 8:12:51 AM PDT by oldvirginian (TED CRUZ, because the Constitution matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian
And you will see in that OT history God also casting low nations used to punish Israel when they inevitably failed to give God the glory (praising their own little gods, their own might, etc.) Point is, God is involved with all the nations, raising up and bringing low.

2 Chr. 7:14

79 posted on 08/06/2015 8:32:03 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Isara

:-) Well played, Isara. It’s a moving dog whistle. Let me ask you, how many of those things provided a job & improved the life of a returning veteran & their loved ones for real?


80 posted on 08/06/2015 8:32:14 AM PDT by KGeorge (Hell no. We ain't forgettin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson