[rktman]

"..beleaguered abortion industry..". Parts suppliers? Srsly? Well, I suppose when they're only talking tissue masses they're not talking about actual people are they. Don't you just love the way your tax dollars are spent without anyone even asking. Good thing for us the conservatives control both.................. Oh. Never mind.

[Gamecock]

**what he called the history of “violence” against abortionists.**

There is a lot more violence in the womb.

[Westbrook]

No fear for violence against the citizenry at large by crazed Mohammedans, though, or he would support shutting down all mosques.

[Robert DeLong]

The dishonorable judge.

[camle]

if the ‘progressives’ can picket outside a dentist’s house, nailing death threats all over the area, why the outrage when the same thing is applied to those who kill children and sell their body parts?

[I want the USA back]

A$$whole judge is afraid of the wrath of feminazis.

[Robert DeLong]

Wife of judge radical abortion supporter

Her YouTube user page shows that the first video she ever “liked” was from an extreme pro-abortion group called the Center for Reproductive Justice. The slick, celebrity-laden video called for people to sign a “bill of rights” that asserts a right to abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy

[PGalt]

Check$, Balance$ and baby parts…it’s how totalitarians FORCE plunder and eliminate voices and opposition.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

I hope CMP gets it website hacked and the video’s released because they left the password as PASSWORD123 ... /h

[BigEdLB]

The videos could go on to the internet from out of the country... If a baby is born alive then killed, then it is murder by any definition. People want to kill the dentist who shot Cecil, so they are worried about the doctors involved, and that they need to go onto hiding who killed the living baby. Killing a lion for sport was wrong and stupid, but not on the level as these Planned Parenthood Mengele-ites, but I wonder who it serves to suppress those videos? Don’t have to go far for an answer

[headstamp 2]

>Orrick expressed worries about “people’s privacy” and what he called the history of “violence” against abortionists.”

The judge is totally compromised on this subject. Similar to the gay judge ruling on prop 8.

[Calpublican]

We are having the experience of some Germans who watched the rise of Nazism in their country.
Evil is all around us. The insanity is frightening and seems unstoppable.

[sickoflibs]

RE:”...– from a California judge who ruled he was extending his order prohibiting public release of certain video evidence by the Center for Medical Progress.
The order came from Judge William H. Orrick, who was nominated to his post by President Obama and has strong financial links to him, having been both a major donor and bundler for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Orrick raised at least $200,000 in that effort and donated $30,800 to committees supporting Obama, according to Public Citizen, the Federalist reported. “

This is no longer America, it is a totalitarian state.

Who voted for cloture on him in GOP??

[FlingWingFlyer]

The clown doesn’t “fear” violence against babies. He must be a real homo turd.

[G Larry]

“Prior restraint”

The order is unconstitutional.

There is NO evidence of a potential for risk to anybody.

[TexasCajun]

Well, we've seen a dish full of different baby parts offered for sale.

The left defends the "tissue' gathering.

Let's hear what Hillary, Liberals, Democrats & MSM have to say when the next video possibly shows a born-alive baby.

[RckyRaCoCo]

"It's what people know about themselves inside that makes 'em afraid..."...High Plains Drifter

[bk1000]

“Judge William H. Orrick,”

Odd how a judge who protects abortionists has a name like a popular brand of vacuum cleaners.

[MarvinStinson]

While there are now two restraining orders against CMP and some video releases,

the orders do not apply to videos not showing StemExpress or the NAF.

Further, the lawsuits by the abortion groups show fear and imply guilt.

They also open up the possibility of these abortion groups having to testify under oath about the accusations.