Here’s How Many Lives Were Taken in Just 8 Armed Attacks in Gun Free Zones

Breitbart ^ | 08/02/2015 | AWR Hawkins

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Calls for more gun control almost always follow a public crime or terror attack in which the attacker–or attackers–use a gun. Yet many of the most infamous attacks take place in gun free zones–places where law-abiding citizens disarm themselves to comply with the rules while criminals take advantage of disarmed masses and open fire.

What follows are just a few of the many examples of shootings in gun free zones that could be listed. There is not one type of firearm that can be blamed–the weapon used was sometimes a handgun, sometimes a rifle, other times a shotgun–nor is there one specific race that can be pinpointed–the attackers come from various races/ethnicities. Nor is this a situation where expanding background checks would have made even the slightest difference–all the attackers listed but one, Adam Lanza, passed a background check for their firearms. Lanza opted to steal his guns instead.

[umgud]

Adam Lanza could legally buy the so-called assault weapon he used. He could not buy handguns due to being under 21.

[NormsRevenge]

Liberals are full of all kinds of great workable solutions, huh?

And a whole pileload of victims as well.

[tacticalogic]

And a whole pileload of victims as well.

Now, now. Those dead bodies are just some little thing that conservatives blow out of proportion.

[GOPJ]

ping

[TXnMA]

"Now, now. Those dead bodies are just some little thing that conservatives blow out of proportion."

I applaud your sarcasm, but, in reality:

Every one is gleefully welcomed by liberals as soapboxes and partying platforms where they can rant and stamp and shout their mindless Marxist propaganda.