Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: I did not send or get classified emails on private account
Reuters ^ | 7/25/15 | Alana Wise

Posted on 07/25/2015 6:28:27 PM PDT by jimbo123

U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said on Saturday that she did not use a private email account to send or receive classified information while she was secretary of state, in response to a government inspector's letter this week.

"I did not send nor receive anything that was classified at the time," Clinton said at a campaign stop in Iowa.

The email controversy has dogged Clinton's bid for the presidency, fuelling worries that the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination has tried to sidestep transparency and record-keeping laws.

At least four emails from the private email account that Clinton used while secretary of state contained classified information, Inspector General Charles McCullough, who oversees U.S. intelligence agencies, told members of Congress in a letter on Thursday.

Clinton said on Saturday she had "no idea" what were the emails mentioned in the letter.

McCullough's letter said a sampling of 40 of about 30,000 emails sent or received by Clinton found at least four that contained information the government had classified as secret.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; Russia; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; canada; charlesmccullough; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; election2016; hillaryabedin; hillaryclinton; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; hillarylies; hitlery; ighillaryemails; inspectorgeneral; inspectorsgeneral; iran; libya; muslimbrotherhood; pages; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; treygowdy; uranium; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: jimbo123
She learned at a young age.


41 posted on 07/25/2015 8:07:39 PM PDT by QT3.14 (California DMV: Department of Mexican Voting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Clinton: 'Please believe me when I tell you that I got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.'

H. Clinton: 'I believe Bill when he said 'I did not have sex with that women', since I was having sex with that women...'

42 posted on 07/25/2015 8:14:54 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

lying SOS are insulted with you lumping them wit Hillary...


43 posted on 07/25/2015 8:22:02 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Then she did not do her job. 3years in prison for every violation. I believe a 5000 year sentence is in order. If anybody else mishandled classified information, they would be in jail.


44 posted on 07/25/2015 8:24:35 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

She’s lying, as she always is.

She even lies when she’s not saying anything.


45 posted on 07/25/2015 8:25:54 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

or 4 minimum up to 29996 maximum


46 posted on 07/25/2015 8:30:08 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BobL

She may believe that she never received anything classified ==

She is not qualified to know; not competent to understand content.

Unless it was a video.


47 posted on 07/25/2015 8:32:15 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Her comment is technically correct. The emails were not classified (properly) since they contained no classification markings; however, the contents were classified, thus it can be argued she is lying (technically).


48 posted on 07/25/2015 8:34:47 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Is she under oath?


49 posted on 07/25/2015 9:00:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Huma, pick up the white courtesy phone.


50 posted on 07/25/2015 9:01:56 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

The law and the constitution mean nothing. Power and politics will decide her fate. If Obama and the Party and the establishment decide that the Clintons are not in their best interests, they will act accordingly. There are no accidents in politics.


51 posted on 07/25/2015 9:15:59 PM PDT by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
"Clinton: I did not send or get classified emails on private account"


52 posted on 07/25/2015 9:33:45 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Exactly! Sec State send hundreds of E mails every Month, at least. Most of these are classified. If she didn't use her server, what did she use? Mabe she used the local Library computers. I guarantee you that the Blumenthal emails were or should have been classified and her e mail to Ambassodor Stevens HAD to be classified. This is simple and they should ask her where she sent her classified emails from. She should be in Jail. If I had done this in the Navy I would still be in some Prison.
53 posted on 07/25/2015 10:01:58 PM PDT by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Let’s be fair. Even though she has never ever told the truth, this time she is sincere and we should believe her. This woman is mentally ill.


54 posted on 07/25/2015 10:05:11 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

And the thing that’s really, really stupid of her (and of anyone who believes her) is to think that most of what the US Secretary of State writes about with other people working the State Department is not going to be either classified or so sensitive that it should be on a classified network. I mean the things they communicate about are inherently valuable to US advisories. Those countries spy on us, as we do on them, precisely to find out what our key leaders think and intend. So she’d like the electorate to all believe she was just chit chatting on that network about yoga and her sweet and charming husband. Balderdash. She was conducting sensitive US business.


55 posted on 07/25/2015 11:30:57 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
I meant to write US adversaries.
56 posted on 07/25/2015 11:35:41 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Oh sure. And with your history, Hillary, we should just accept you at your word. Ha ha.


57 posted on 07/26/2015 2:36:50 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
And Hillary's proof is ......?
And Hillary's credibility for telling the truth is ......?
58 posted on 07/26/2015 3:12:11 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

That is only the emails that were released. Remember she only released what she wanted to release.


59 posted on 07/26/2015 4:14:19 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Chelsea’s wedding plans and her yoga schedule seem to have been well protected.

US classified information....not so protected.


60 posted on 07/26/2015 4:18:22 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson