The Court is an important issue, but I don’t think we want to emphasize it. I’d rather elect President Cruz and then have the low-information liberals realize that he will restore the rule of law. If we warn America’s enemies, they will be more likely to vote.
They’re likely to scream about the tea leaves anyhow. In the long run, being forthright is the best policy.
“The Court is an important issue, but I don’t think we want to emphasize it. I’d rather elect President Cruz and then have the low-information liberals realize that he will restore the rule of law. If we warn America’s enemies, they will be more likely to vote.”
Im not entirely sure that is possible.
We should not require or desire a president to ‘restore the rule of law’ simply becase even if he did the ‘rule of law’ would then become depended upon there being a willing president. Obama of all presidents prove that is not necessarily going to be the case.
If there is to be ‘rule of law’ in this country it must be insisted upon and enforced from the ground up by our state and local governments, as well as congress and every other party involved. When the ‘rule of law’ becomes depended upon the cooperation or consent of one man or group of men it ceases to be ‘rule of law’.