Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2015 9:43:07 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

They should have never been disarmed. Who did that??


2 posted on 07/20/2015 9:44:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Lift the ban completely, for goodness’ sake. It’s been stupid from the first day and continues to be stupid today.


3 posted on 07/20/2015 9:45:01 AM PDT by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Only in liberal America would the Armed Forces be unarmed.


5 posted on 07/20/2015 9:46:01 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

It’s too bad our Constitution didn’t say anything about the right to keep and bear arms.

If there had been any sort of stipulation, or even an amendment about that there wouldn’t be any need to debate such issues.


7 posted on 07/20/2015 9:49:23 AM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Congress? What power do they have to make Zer0 do anything?


8 posted on 07/20/2015 9:49:35 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
One wonders in the history of the Knesset whether it ever pondered whether is soldiers (or citizens for that matter) should be armed. To keep arms from our soldiers (for you folks out there who are as old as I am, our sons and daughters and grand children) in an age when we are beset with a government sanctioned onslaught of foreign infestation is treason in my opinion.
9 posted on 07/20/2015 9:49:37 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
This is ludicrous. US military members generally are psychologically screened better than the civilian population.

This screening starts at pre-induction then follows the service member, to some degree, throughout their active duty time.

Sure there are some exceptions but the active screening process is designed to detect them.

13 posted on 07/20/2015 9:53:40 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They’ll wait until the next one, the. Tel us again how much safer people are in gun free zones.


14 posted on 07/20/2015 9:56:05 AM PDT by South40 ("I probably identify more as a Democrat." ~Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Are Congress critters protected with armed guards? (Rhetorical, I know the answer.)....Then so should our MILITARY, you idgits!


22 posted on 07/20/2015 10:13:45 AM PDT by goodnesswins (hey..Wussie Americans....ISIS is coming. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

This is generally impractical for a whole litany of military reasons. About the only way it could be done would be to require all officers to be issued sidearms that they would have to carry, even during PT. And most units do not have enough sidearms to be issued to all officers at once. To do their pistol qualifications, anywhere from 3-5 officers have to share a gun.

Personally owned weapons are right out, as they are not uniform, would have to be stored and inspected in an arms room that is typically unmanned, and would be a major pain to transport on to or off post.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.


29 posted on 07/20/2015 10:54:42 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Congress is weighing it, but there is no problem for them to have armed protection if needed.


30 posted on 07/20/2015 11:13:10 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

“Congress” is totally retarded.


32 posted on 07/20/2015 7:24:51 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson