Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clueless Reporters Question President Piinocchio
Power Line ^ | 15 July 2015 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 07/15/2015 10:43:09 PM PDT by Rummyfan

Today President Obama met the White House press corps at length to defend his Iran nuclear deal. One could deconstruct his evasions line by line, but that would largely duplicate the content of many posts we have done over the past weeks and months. Instead, I want to focus on a few key issues. But first, this observation: if any of the reporters present had read the agreement, which is only 159 pages long, it was not apparent. Maybe reporters are not accustomed to reading legal documents; maybe they are too lazy to try; maybe they have read and understood the agreement and are just partisan hacks, covering for their president. But I have a full-time job, and nevertheless have read the agreement several times. Why can’t reporters do the same? That would seem to be a prerequisite to participating intelligently in a press conference on the subject.

The following observations are, I think, the most important points that emerged from the press conference

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: media; msm; obama

1 posted on 07/15/2015 10:43:09 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Obama may as well have held up a paper in hand saying,

“I have Mr. Hitler’s Signature on this agreement. This means PEACE IN OUR TIME!”


2 posted on 07/15/2015 10:46:45 PM PDT by x_plus_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Clueless?

No.

Cheerleaders.

Propagandists.

Purveyors of tyranny and genocide.

No matter what he does.

He is their Marxist Messiah and he will always be made to look as if he walks on water, even when he is drowning the world and setting the board for our complete annihilation.


3 posted on 07/15/2015 11:32:21 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Cut and paste is your friend.


4 posted on 07/16/2015 12:07:05 AM PDT by Misterioso (Islam is un-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

If it was such a great nuclear deal, why was the press conference immediately labeled defensive? If it is such a great nuclear deal, why did Odumbo threaten Congress with a veto immediately?


5 posted on 07/16/2015 1:33:44 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

Sorry. Hadn’t had my morning coffee yet!


6 posted on 07/16/2015 1:57:09 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Those are no longer press conferences.

They are the Call To Prayer for Leftists.


7 posted on 07/16/2015 4:07:44 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“$100+ billion is a lot of money”

No kidding. Just think what that would do to help our own people.

The Iranians cannot and should never be trusted. My only hope is that someone will soon wake up to what a total disaster this “deal” truly is and then walk away from it. If Iran can walk away, the U.S. can also walk away as it should.


8 posted on 07/16/2015 4:16:14 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

You can keep your doctor
You can keep your insurance

The fallacy in the Presidents argument over those held captive is that there is always going to be a price to be paid for their release. Upping the ante in the nuclear negotiations might actually be less than a stand alone negotiation. The clear answer is that outside back channel negotiations that are in the process of developing a release, there is no real reason to spend time, resources and political capital to get such a small return on the investment.

The real reason is that the USA was not driving the process. The Euros were driving the process and will get Iran back as a customer

The media is far more Americentric than it should be on the story


9 posted on 07/16/2015 4:29:02 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

10 posted on 07/16/2015 4:33:59 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

He really had to go!

OBAMA: No. Look, I’m always hopeful that behavior may change for the sake of the Iranian people as well as people in the region. There are young people there who are not getting the opportunities they deserve because of conflict, because of sectarianism, because of poor governance, because of repression, because of terrorism, and I remain eternally hopeful that we can do something about that, and it should be part of U.S. foreign policy to do something about that.

But I’m not banking on that to say that this deal is the right thing to do. Again, it is incumbent on the critics of this deal to explain how an American president is in a worse position 12, 13, 14, 15 years from now, if at that point, Iran says we’re going to pull out of the MPT, kick out inspectors and go for a nuclear bomb. If that happens, that president will be in a better position than would happen if Iran, as a consequence of Congress rejecting this deal, decides that’s it. We’re done negotiating. We’re going after a bomb right now.

The choices would be tougher today than they would be for that president 15 years from now. And I have not yet heard logic that refutes that. All right?

I really have to go now. I think we’ve hit the big themes, but I — but I promise you I will — I will address this again, all right? I suspect this is not the last that we’ve heard of this debate.


11 posted on 07/16/2015 4:35:50 AM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

Major Harris is the exception. Did you see the look that Obama gave him? “How dare you ask me a hard question” ?


12 posted on 07/16/2015 5:02:12 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Sorry, that is Major Garrett who asked the honest question!


13 posted on 07/16/2015 5:06:12 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
We’re going after a bomb right now.

They are going after a bomb right now. And this deal gives them $100 billion to fund that effort. The deal is worthwhile for the Iranians for the money alone.

14 posted on 07/16/2015 5:26:57 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Mainstream Media "reporters" all look like this:


15 posted on 07/16/2015 6:00:41 AM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

I like that. It should be used far and wide.


16 posted on 07/16/2015 6:14:51 AM PDT by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson